Literature DB >> 29164601

Clinical decision analysis in perinatology.

Rohan D'Souza1,2, Prakesh S Shah2,3, Beate Sander2,4.   

Abstract

Clinical decision-making in perinatology involves trade-offs between two intricately related individuals - mother and fetus. Decision-making in perinatology is challenging due to competing interests of the mother and the fetus. Although decision analytic methods are increasingly used to develop processes for clinical and cost-effectiveness analyses in perinatology, there are no guidelines on the conduct and reporting of decision analysis studies that takes into account the complexities of the mother-fetus dyad. This article describes the basics of decision analysis and highlights areas that require special consideration in the perinatal context. It emphasizes the importance of obtaining patient preferences related to combined maternal-fetal health states, stresses the relevance of both maternal and offspring health outcomes over appropriate time horizons, and explains challenges around the use of quality-adjusted life years as an outcome measure in perinatology. It also provides insight into the complexities of dyad status in clinical and cost-effectiveness analyses in perinatology.
© 2017 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision analysis; model-based economic evaluation; obstetrics; perinatology; pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29164601     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  6 in total

Review 1.  Anaesthetic considerations and anticoagulation in pregnant patients with mechanical heart valves.

Authors:  K Bhatia; N Shehata; R D'Souza
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2022-03-24

2.  Patients and Health Care Providers Identify Important Outcomes for Research on Pregnancy and Heart Disease.

Authors:  Chelsea Hall; Rohan D D'Souza
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2020-06-04

3.  Composite adverse outcomes in obstetric studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dylan Herman; Kar Yee Lor; Abdul Qadree; Daphne Horn; Rohan D'Souza
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Decision Analysis in SHared decision making for Thromboprophylaxis during Pregnancy (DASH-TOP): a sequential explanatory mixed methods pilot study protocol.

Authors:  Brittany Humphries; Montserrat León-García; Shannon Bates; Gordon Guyatt; Mark Eckman; Rohan D'Souza; Nadine Shehata; Susan Jack; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Feng Xie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Development of a core outcome set for studies on prevention and management of pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism (COSPVenTE): a study protocol.

Authors:  Alexandria King; Rohan D'Souza; Lizabeth Teshler; Nadine Shehata; Ann K Malinowski
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies on Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy (COSCarP): a study protocol.

Authors:  Rohan D'Souza; Chelsea Hall; Mathew Sermer; Samuel Siu; Candice Silversides
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.