Anna Chu1, Cushla Holdaway1, Trishala Varma1, Peter Petocz2, Samir Samman3,4. 1. Department of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand. 2. Department of Statistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia. 3. Department of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand. samir.samman@otago.ac.nz. 4. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. samir.samman@otago.ac.nz.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Zinc is an essential trace element that has been implicated in numerous biological functions, including immunity, energy metabolism and antioxidative processes. Recent evaluations of the literature have provided evidence of significant acute changes in zinc metabolism following a bout of aerobic exercise. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the zinc status of trained athletes compared with control populations, as described in cross-sectional studies. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic literature search of the PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Cochrane Library electronic databases from inception to 28 January 2016 to identify cross-sectional studies that determined the zinc status of athletes compared with a control population. Meta-analysis of the differences in serum zinc concentration and dietary zinc intake between groups were conducted. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in the systematic review. Of the included studies, nine and eight studies provided sufficient data for the meta-analysis of serum zinc concentration and dietary zinc intake, respectively. Serum zinc concentration was significantly lower in athletes [- 0.93 μmol/L, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 1.62 to - 0.23] despite significantly higher dietary zinc intake compared with the control population (2.57 mg/day, 95% CI 0.97-4.16). Data on erythrocyte and urinary zinc from the included studies were insufficient for meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher total dietary zinc intake, athletes generally have lower serum zinc concentration, which suggests that athletes have higher requirement of zinc than those who are physically inactive. Further investigations of zinc metabolism during exercise and dietary zinc requirement in active populations are needed to establish evidence-based recommendations.
BACKGROUND: Zinc is an essential trace element that has been implicated in numerous biological functions, including immunity, energy metabolism and antioxidative processes. Recent evaluations of the literature have provided evidence of significant acute changes in zinc metabolism following a bout of aerobic exercise. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the zinc status of trained athletes compared with control populations, as described in cross-sectional studies. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic literature search of the PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Cochrane Library electronic databases from inception to 28 January 2016 to identify cross-sectional studies that determined the zinc status of athletes compared with a control population. Meta-analysis of the differences in serum zinc concentration and dietary zinc intake between groups were conducted. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in the systematic review. Of the included studies, nine and eight studies provided sufficient data for the meta-analysis of serum zinc concentration and dietary zinc intake, respectively. Serum zinc concentration was significantly lower in athletes [- 0.93 μmol/L, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 1.62 to - 0.23] despite significantly higher dietary zinc intake compared with the control population (2.57 mg/day, 95% CI 0.97-4.16). Data on erythrocyte and urinary zinc from the included studies were insufficient for meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher total dietary zinc intake, athletes generally have lower serum zinc concentration, which suggests that athletes have higher requirement of zinc than those who are physically inactive. Further investigations of zinc metabolism during exercise and dietary zinc requirement in active populations are needed to establish evidence-based recommendations.
Authors: Josely C Koury; Astrogildo V de Olilveria; Emílson S Portella; Cyntia F de Olilveria; Gustavo C Lopes; Carmen M Donangelo Journal: Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: G M Fogelholm; J J Himberg; K Alopaeus; C G Gref; J T Laakso; J J Lehto; H Mussalo-Rauhamaa Journal: J Am Coll Nutr Date: 1992-04 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn Vist; Regina Kunz; Jan Brozek; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Victor Montori; Elie A Akl; Ben Djulbegovic; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Susan L Norris; John W Williams; David Atkins; Joerg Meerpohl; Holger J Schünemann Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Juan P Liuzzi; Louis A Lichten; Seth Rivera; Raymond K Blanchard; Tolunay Beker Aydemir; Mitchell D Knutson; Tomas Ganz; Robert J Cousins Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-04-29 Impact factor: 11.205