Literature DB >> 2916427

Evaluation of electrode polarity on defibrillation efficacy.

G H Bardy1, T D Ivey, M D Allen, G Johnson, H L Greene.   

Abstract

The effect of electrode polarity on defibrillation thresholds in humans is unknown. This prospective, randomized evaluation of electrode polarity on defibrillation thresholds was performed in 21 survivors of ventricular fibrillation (VF) undergoing cardiac surgery. Defibrillation was always performed with 2 identical large rectangular, wire mesh electrodes positioned over the anterior wall of the right ventricle and the posterolateral wall of the left ventricle. The initial electrode polarity for the left ventricular (LV) electrode was chosen randomly for determination of the defibrillation threshold. Subsequently, electrode polarity was reversed. The defibrillation threshold was defined as the lowest pulse amplitude that would effectively terminate VF with a single discharge delivered 10 seconds after initiation of an episode of VF with alternating current. For each defibrillation pulse, voltage, current, resistance and delivered energy were recorded. Of the 21 patients, 15 (71%) had a lower defibrillation threshold when the LV electrode was positive, 2 patients (10%) had a lower defibrillation threshold when the LV electrode was negative and 4 patients (19%) had equal defibrillation thresholds (within 0.5 J) regardless of polarity. The mean leading edge defibrillation threshold voltage was 370 +/- 88 volts when the LV electrode was negative and 320 +/- 109 volts (14% less) when the LV electrode was positive (p = 0.014). Mean leading edge defibrillation threshold current was 9.3 +/- 3.1 amps when the LV electrode was negative compared to 7.7 +/- 3.1 amps (17% less) when the LV electrode was positive (p = 0.0033). There were no differences in resistance with the 2 configurations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2916427     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90314-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  The 1998 European Resuscitation Council guidelines for adult advanced life support. Advanced Life Support Working Group of the European Resuscitation Council.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-20

2.  Multicentre comparison Of shock efficacy using single-vs. Dual-coil lead systems and Anodal vs. cathodaL polarITY defibrillation in patients undergoing transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. The MODALITY study.

Authors:  Maria Stella Baccillieri; Gianni Gasparini; Luca Benacchio; Alessandro Zorzi; Elena Marras; Francesca Zerbo; Luca Tomasi; Diego Vaccari; Gianni Pastore; Carlo Bonanno; Giulio Molon; Gabriele Zanotto; Antonio Fusco; Massimo Carasi; Andrea Zorzi; Vittorio Calzolari; Barbara Ignatiuk; Sergio Cannas; Alessandro Vaglio; Muhamad Al Bunni; Antonella Pedrini; Armando Olivieri; Roberta Rampazzo; Nadia Minicuci; Domenico Corrado; Roberto Verlato
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  [Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation].

Authors:  S Reek; R E Ideker
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03

4.  Effect of shock polarity on defibrillation thresholds with a hybrid patch-coil lead system.

Authors:  Eric J Rashba; Stephen R Shorofsky; Robert W Peters; Michael R Gold
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Role of proximal electrode position in transvenous ventricular defibrillation.

Authors:  J Nitta; D S Khoury
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.934

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.