Literature DB >> 29164181

Gingival depigmentation using Er:YAG laser and scalpel technique: A six-month prospective clinical study.

Rola Alhabashneh, Obaida Darawi, Yousef S Khader, Lama Ashour.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the 6-month clinical efficacy of Er:YAG laser and standard scalpel technique in treating gingival hyperpigmentation. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Patients requesting treatment for moderate to severe gingival hyperpigmentation in the maxilla were enrolled in this split-mouth study. The contralateral maxillary sides were randomly assigned to receive either Er:YAG laser (continuous wavelength of 2,940 nm) with a noncontact tip or the standard scalpel technique. Dummett oral pigmentation index (DOPI) and Hedin melanin index (HMI) were compared at the baseline and at 1 and 2 weeks, and 1, 3, and 6 months following the treatment. Bleeding Index, total treatment time, patient preference, pain perception at the first 3 days, wound healing, and level of satisfaction were also compared. Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and chi-square test were used to test the significance between variables. A P value of less than or equal to .05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Of the 22 patients enrolled, 20 completed this study. After assessing DOPI and HMI at 1 and 2 weeks, and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up appointments, both Er:YAG laser and scalpel were significantly effective in treating gingival hyperpigmentation when compared to baseline (P < .001) but with no statistically significant difference between the two treatment methods (P > .05). More patients preferred the scalpel technique as it was associated with slightly shorter treatment time and less postoperative pain when compared to Er:YAG laser, but with no statistical significance (P > .05). Er:YAG laser sites showed minimal bleeding and more rapid wound healing (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Both Er:YAG laser and scalpel technique achieved similar outcomes regarding the efficacy of gingival depigmentation, postoperative pain perception, and the time required for the treatment. Laser therapy requires more advanced technology and is associated with higher financial costs. Therefore, the scalpel technique is still considered the gold standard treatment for gingival depigmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29164181     DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a39267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quintessence Int        ISSN: 0033-6572            Impact factor:   1.677


  5 in total

1.  Effect of Er:YAG laser combined with ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid on three-walled periodontal intrabony defects adjacent to implant sites.

Authors:  Ba Li Gen Bolatihan; Zhi Hui Lin; Yi Man
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2021-12-01

2.  Comparison of the Effectiveness of CO2 and Diode Lasers for Gingival Melanin Depigmentation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Amir Moeintaghavi; Farzaneh Ahrari; Amir Fallahrastegar; Asma Salehnia
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-02-22

Review 3.  Most effective method for the management of physiologic gingival hyperpigmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meisha Gul; Muhammad Hasan Hameed; Muhammad Rizwan Nazeer; Robia Ghafoor; Farhan Raza Khan
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2019 May-Jun

4.  Evaluation of surgical scalpel versus semiconductor diode laser techniques in the management of gingival melanin hyperpigmentation: A split-mouth randomized clinical comparative study.

Authors:  Ganachari Bharath Chandra; Malleshappa Bhairammanavar VinayKumar; Narayan Narendra Walavalkar; Kharidhi Laxman Vandana; Pabbati Krishna Vardhan
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2020-01-02

5.  Gingival Depigmentation Using Diode 980 nm and Erbium-YAG 2940 nm Lasers: A Split-Mouth Clinical Comparative Study.

Authors:  Zaid Kamel Jnaid Harb; Walid El-Sayed; Jumma Alkhabuli
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-12-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.