Literature DB >> 29163170

European Drug Users at Risk from Illicit Fentanyls Mix.

Simona Pichini1, Roberta Pacifici1, Enrico Marinelli2, Francesco P Busardò2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  fatalities; fentanyl derivatives; health threat; intoxications; new synthetic opioids

Year:  2017        PMID: 29163170      PMCID: PMC5671664          DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Pharmacol        ISSN: 1663-9812            Impact factor:   5.810


× No keyword cloud information.
The increase of overdose deaths involving licit and illicit fentanyl analogs (FAs), recently observed in North America, has shifted toward Europe posing a serious public health menace (Mounteney et al., 2015). The widespread appearance of these synthetic opioids, between 50 and 100 times more potent than morphine and in many cases not approved for medical use, has been reported by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (European Drug Report, 2017). Indeed, in the last few years a number of FAs, (e.g., despropionyl-2-fluorofentanyl, furanylfentanyl, valerylfentanyl, acryloylfentanyl, carfentanyl, butyrfentanyls) has appeared for the first time on the European illicit market having caused more than 100 fatalities, when used alone or in association to other drugs (UNODC, 2017). Due to the low cost of the required materials and equipment for producing these compounds in clandestine laboratories inside and outside Europe, they are sold by drug dealers in place of heroin or mixed with it as cutting agents. In this context, the possibility of fatal overdoses is extremely high because of the narrow range between a safe and a lethal dose and the manufacturing of quantitatively inaccurate and contaminated products (UNODC, 2017). Current evidence suggests that both FAs availability on the illicit market and related acute and lethal intoxications are indisputably underestimated because of the analytical challenges caused by the structural difficulties in identifying unscheduled compounds. Often, overdoses caused by novel synthetic opioids are not fully investigated, difficult to report according to ICD 10 (especially in the way to distinguish different fentanyl analogs) and are simply classified as “heroin-related fatalities” (Swanson et al., 2017). Additional challenge could be also that the range of FAs being used is continuously changing and for health professionals, forensic toxicologists, pathologists, epidemiologists and lawmakers it is difficult to be up to date. Recently, Frank and Pollack commented on the threat to public health caused by widespread use of illegal fentanyl in US with the doubling of overdose deaths involving this drug (Frank and Pollack, 2017). The authors suggested to primarily implement policies of “harm reduction” redirecting user demand away from products containing fentanyl, reducing unintentional fentanyl consumption, increasing penalties on illegal fentanyl distributors and sellers and finally providing timely availability of naloxone and medication-assisted therapy. In this concern, there is a suggestion by health professionals to increase naloxone doses in case of overdoses by fentanyl analogs. In addition to these recommendations, we wish to draw the attention of the whole scientific community on the importance of improving surveillance and data sharing of FAs through National and International Early Warning Systems (EWS) set up throughout Europe and a standardization in reporting FAs related deaths. Analytical methodologies for the identification of fentanyl analogs and eventual metabolites in ante mortem and post mortem cases should be developed, validated, and analytical data shared through different communication platforms (e.g., EWS and Europol). We advocate for the correct identification of the phenomenon to implement contextual strategies in order to restrain the use and abuse of FAs and stop this incoming threat for health of European drug users.

Author contributions

FPB prepared the first daft of this opinion paper together with the other three coauthors, revising the existing literature and approved the last draft of the paper. SP, RP, and EM revised the existing literature concerning fentanyls, prepared the first draft of the opinion with FPB and approved the final version.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  3 in total

1.  Addressing the Fentanyl Threat to Public Health.

Authors:  Richard G Frank; Harold A Pollack
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Fentanyls: Are we missing the signs? Highly potent and on the rise in Europe.

Authors:  Jane Mounteney; Isabelle Giraudon; Gleb Denissov; Paul Griffiths
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2015-04-17

3.  Fatalities Involving Carfentanil and Furanyl Fentanyl: Two Case Reports.

Authors:  Dina M Swanson; Laura S Hair; Selly R Strauch Rivers; Brianna C Smyth; Sara C Brogan; Alexis D Ventoso; Samantha L Vaccaro; Julia M Pearson
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.367

  3 in total
  11 in total

1.  New Psychoactive Substances Consumption in Opioid-Use Disorder Patients.

Authors:  Maria Alías-Ferri; Manuela Pellegrini; Emilia Marchei; Roberta Pacifici; Maria Concetta Rotolo; Simona Pichini; Clara Pérez-Mañá; Esther Papaseit; Robert Muga; Francina Fonseca; Marta Torrens; Magí Farré
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22

2.  Pharmacotoxicology of Non-fentanyl Derived New Synthetic Opioids.

Authors:  Renata Solimini; Simona Pichini; Roberta Pacifici; Francesco P Busardò; Raffaele Giorgetti
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  Collaboration of the Joint Research Centre and European Customs Laboratories for the Identification of New Psychoactive Substances.

Authors:  Claude Guillou; Fabiano Reniero; Joana Lobo Vicente; Margaret Holland; Kamil Kolar; Hubert Chassaigne; Salvatore Tirendi; Herve Schepers
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.837

Review 4.  New Psychoactive Substances: Evolution in the Exchange of Information and Innovative Legal Responses in the European Union.

Authors:  Maria Rosaria Varì; Giulio Mannocchi; Roberta Tittarelli; Laura Leondina Campanozzi; Giulio Nittari; Alessandro Feola; Federica Umani Ronchi; Giovanna Ricci
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Substance use disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic: looking for new innovative approaches.

Authors:  Valeria Piersanti; Francesca Consalvo; Enrico Marinelli
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-03-14

6.  Synthetic Benzimidazole Opioids: The Emerging Health Challenge for European Drug Users.

Authors:  Annagiulia Di Trana; Simona Pichini; Roberta Pacifici; Raffaele Giorgetti; Francesco Paolo Busardò
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  New Psychoactive Substances and receding COVID-19 pandemic: really going back to "normal"?

Authors:  Simona Napoletano; Giuseppe Basile; Alfredo Fabrizio Lo Faro; Francesca Negro
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-05-11

Review 8.  Drug Interactions With New Synthetic Opioids.

Authors:  Clara Pérez-Mañá; Esther Papaseit; Francina Fonseca; Adriana Farré; Marta Torrens; Magi Farré
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  High-Throughput Qualitative and Quantitative Drug Checking by MALDI HRMS.

Authors:  Timothée Joye; Christèle Widmer; Roxane Morger Mégevand; Serge Longère; Marc Augsburger; Aurélien Thomas
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 5.221

10.  Molecular Insights on New Psychoactive Substances (NPSs).

Authors:  Francesco Paolo Busardò; Simona Pichini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.