| Literature DB >> 29163005 |
Niall Colgan1,2, Balaji Ganeshan3, Ian F Harrison1, Ozama Ismail1, Holly E Holmes1, Jack A Wells1, Nick M Powell1, James M O'Callaghan1, Michael J O'Neill4, Tracey K Murray4, Zeshan Ahmed4, Emily C Collins5, Ross A Johnson5, Ashley Groves3, Mark F Lythgoe1.
Abstract
Background: Non-invasive characterization of the pathological features of Alzheimer's disease (AD) could enhance patient management and the development of therapeutic strategies. Magnetic resonance imaging texture analysis (MRTA) has been used previously to extract texture descriptors from structural clinical scans in AD to determine cerebral tissue heterogeneity. In this study, we examined the potential of MRTA to specifically identify tau pathology in an AD mouse model and compared the MRTA metrics to histological measures of tau burden.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer's Disease; MRI imaging; MRTA; tauopathies; texture analysis
Year: 2017 PMID: 29163005 PMCID: PMC5681716 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00599
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Figure 1Wildtype and rTg4510 texture analysis images, MRI image with ROI's (A,E), fine filter images (B,F), medium filter (C,G), and coarse filter (D,H).
Figure 2Immunohistochemistry to estimate regional PG-5 positive NFT density. (A) Single slice from a representative rTg4510 mouse with staining for PG-5 positive NFTs. Marked regional dependence of NFT density is observable [see inset (B–D) for examples of cortical (B), hippocampal (C), and thalamic (D) NFT distribution]. (E) Quantitative regional estimates of NFT density for each of the 16 WT and 9 TG mice that underwent MRI (8.5 month age).
Significant cortex textural parameters of mean gray level intensity (M), entropy (E), uniformity (U), skewness (S), and kurtosis (K).
| M fine | 4, 536 ± 0.49 | 4068 ± 0.33 | 0.0001 | 4.31 | 23.0 |
| E fine | 6.14 ± 0.01 | 6.57 ± 0.01 | 0.001 | 5.39 | 23.0 |
| K fine | 0.23 ± 0.06 | −0.74 ± 0.11 | 0.001 | 4.04 | 23.0 |
| E medium | 4.54 ± 0.2 | 5.54 ± 0.07 | 0.001 | 4.59 | 23.0 |
| U medium | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.04 | 4.76 | 23.0 |
| K medium | 0.26 ± 0.3 | −0.69 ± 0.1 | 0.02 | 5.97 | 23.0 |
| E coarse | 0.66 ± 0.29 | 2.67 ± 0.28 | 0.001 | 5.69 | 23.0 |
| U coarse | 0.73 ± 0.12 | 0.22 ± 0.07 | 0.001 | 4.01 | 23.0 |
| S coarse | 0.48 ± 0.31 | −0.61 ± 0.15 | 0.002 | 4.34 | 23.0 |
| K coarse | 0.11 ± 0.01 | −0.42 ± 0.02 | 0.0001 | 6.34 | 23.0 |
Significant hippocampus textural parameters of entropy (E) and kurtosis (K).
| E fine | 5.34 ± 0.10 | 6.24 ± 0.09 | 0.001 | 9.34 | 23.0 |
| K fine | 0.59 ± 0.24 | −0.22 ± 0.28 | 0.05 | 5.52 | 23.0 |
| E medium | 3.57 ± 0.30 | 4.72 ± 0.1 | 0.002 | 6.39 | 23.0 |
| K medium | 0.48 ± 0.07 | −0.2 ± 0.07 | 0.001 | 4.36 | 23.0 |
| K coarse | 0.18 ± 0.02 | −0.41 ± 0.01 | 0.001 | 4.34 | 23.0 |
Significant thalamus textural parameters of entropy (E), kurtosis (K), and uniformity (U).
| E fine | 6.28 ± 0.03 | 7.03 ± 0.02 | 0.001 | 9.35 | 23.0 |
| K fine | 0.09 ± 0.001 | −0.1 ± 0.01 | 0.001 | 4.19 | 23.0 |
| E medium | 5.49 ± 0.004 | 6.19 ± 0.001 | 0.002 | 6.39 | 23.0 |
| K medium | 0.02 ± 0.002 | −0.02 ± 0.003 | 0.004 | 4.36 | 23.0 |
| K coarse | 0.34 ± 0.007 | −0.19 ± 0.002 | 0.001 | 4.33 | 23.0 |
| U coarse | 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.02 ± 0.001 | 0.001 | 4.86 | 23.0 |
Figure 3Pearson correlation of average cell density and Kurtosis (medium texture filter) in each anatomical region of rTg4510 mice (n = 9).