Literature DB >> 29162384

Relevance-dependent modulation of tactile suppression during active, passive and pantomime reach-to-grasp movements.

Damian M Manzone1, J Timothy Inglis1, Ian M Franks1, Romeo Chua2.   

Abstract

When we move, our ability to detect tactile events on the moving limb is reduced (e.g., movement-related tactile suppression). This process prevents unimportant sensory information from bombarding our central nervous system. This study investigated whether movement-related suppression can be modulated according to task relevance, while introducing a novel motor-driven complex upper limb movement. In three experiments, participants performed volitional self-driven and passive motor-driven reaching and grasping movements. Over the course of the movement, weak electrical stimulation was presented at task-relevant (i.e., index finger) and irrelevant sites (i.e., forearm) on the moving limb. In Experiment 1, participants displayed reduced detectability during movement (90% resting detection). This was true for all locations on the moving limb irrespective of task-relevance and during both self and motor-driven movements. In Experiments 2 and 3 a range of stimulus amplitudes were presented to one task-relevant location during both self and motor-driven movements (Experiment 2A), to a task-relevant and irrelevant site (Experiment 2B) and during a targeted and pantomime/no target reach (Experiment 3). This allowed us to estimate perceptual thresholds and assess the magnitude of movement-related suppression. During both self and motor-driven movements participants exhibited movement-related suppression. Suppression was greater at the irrelevant site (forearm) than at the relevant site (index finger) of the limb. Further, the magnitude of suppression varied with task relevance such that pantomime movements elicited more suppression than targeted movements. Collectively, these experiments suggest that although tactile suppression may be a general consequence of movement, suppression can be modulated in a relevance-dependent manner.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Goal-directed movement; Sensory suppression; Tactile suppression; Task-relevance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29162384     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.11.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  5 in total

1.  Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception.

Authors:  Damian M Manzone; Luc Tremblay; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Tactile suppression stems from specific sensorimotor predictions.

Authors:  Elena Fuehrer; Dimitris Voudouris; Alexandra Lezkan; Knut Drewing; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Dynamic temporal modulation of somatosensory processing during reaching.

Authors:  Dimitris Voudouris; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Linking Signal Relevancy and Intensity in Predictive Tactile Suppression.

Authors:  Marie C Beyvers; Lindsey E Fraser; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Vision facilitates tactile perception when grasping an object.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Francisco L Colino; Xhino Meleqi; Gordon Binsted; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.