Literature DB >> 29162014

Technological innovations and the rise of social inequalities in health.

Daniel Weiss1,2, Terje Andreas Eikemo2.   

Abstract

Social inequalities in health have been categorised as a human-rights issue that requires action. Unfortunately, these inequalities are on the rise in many countries, including welfare states. Various theories have been offered to explain the persistence (and rise) of these inequalities over time, including the social determinants of health and fundamental cause theory. Interestingly, the rise of modern social inequalities in health has come at a time of great technological innovation. This article addresses whether these technological innovations are significantly influencing the persistence of modern social inequalities in health. A theoretical argument is offered for this potential connection and is discussed alongside the typical social determinants of health perspective and the increasingly popular fundamental cause perspective. This is followed by a proposed research agenda for further investigation of the potential role that technological innovations may play in influencing social inequalities in health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Social; diffusion of innovations; fundamental cause; health; inequalities; marmot; medical sociology; social determinants; technology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29162014     DOI: 10.1177/1403494817711371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  8 in total

1.  Good intentions are not enough: how informatics interventions can worsen inequality.

Authors:  Tiffany C Veinot; Hannah Mitchell; Jessica S Ancker
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Is research on patient portals attuned to health equity? A scoping review.

Authors:  Marcy G Antonio; Olga Petrovskaya; Francis Lau
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  GeoSES: A socioeconomic index for health and social research in Brazil.

Authors:  Ligia Vizeu Barrozo; Michel Fornaciali; Carmen Diva Saldiva de André; Guilherme Augusto Zimeo Morais; Giselle Mansur; William Cabral-Miranda; Marina Jorge de Miranda; João Ricardo Sato; Edson Amaro Júnior
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Sex and age differences in attitudes and intention to adopt personalised nutrition in a UK sample.

Authors:  Barbara J Stewart-Knox; Rui Poínhos; Arnout R H Fischer; Mutassam Chaudhrey; Audrey Rankin; Jenny Davison; Brendan P Bunting; Lynn J Frewer; Bruno M P M Oliveira
Journal:  Z Gesundh Wiss       Date:  2021-12-14

5.  Understanding and Addressing the Digital Health Literacy Needs of Low-Income Limited English Proficient Asian American Patients.

Authors:  George Lee; Anita Chang; Agnita Pal; Thu-An Tran; Xinyue Cui; Thu Quach
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2022-07-04

Review 6.  Nordic research on health inequalities: A scoping review of empirical studies published in Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2000-2021.

Authors:  Jon Ivar Elstad; Kristian Heggebø; Espen Dahl
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Virtual Care and the Inverse Care Law: Implications for Policy, Practice, Research, Public and Patients.

Authors:  Hassane Alami; Pascale Lehoux; Sara E Shaw; Chrysanthi Papoutsi; Sarah Rybczynska-Bunt; Jean-Paul Fortin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Assessment of Out-of-Pocket Costs for Robotic Cancer Surgery in US Adults.

Authors:  Junaid Nabi; David F Friedlander; Xi Chen; Alexander P Cole; Jim C Hu; Adam S Kibel; Prokar Dasgupta; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-01-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.