Literature DB >> 29161674

Deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate gyrus in patients with treatment-resistant depression: A double-blinded randomized controlled study and long-term follow-up in eight patients.

Angela Merkl1, Sabine Aust2, Gerd-Helge Schneider3, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle4, Andreas Horn5, Andrea A Kühn6, Jens Kuhn7, Malek Bajbouj2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subcallosal cingulate gyrus (SCG) is an experimental approach in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Short-term results of efficacy in DBS are incongruent and studies investigating long-term effects are warranted.
METHODS: We assessed efficacy of SCG-DBS in eight patients randomized into a delayed-onset group (sham-DBS four weeks) and a non-delayed-onset group. The primary outcome measure was improvement on the Hamilton Depression Rating-Scale (HAMD-24-item-version). Response was defined as HAMD-24 reduction of at least 50% compared to baseline. Assessment was double-blind for a period of eight weeks and after 6,- 12,- 24,- and 28,- months open-label.
RESULTS: The average improvement in HAMD-24 scores after 6,- 12,- and 24-months were 34%, 25%, and 37%. After 6 months, HAMD-24 revealed a significant difference (P = .022) and 37.5% of the patients were responders. After 12 months, HAMD-24 scores dropped, but no significant difference was observed. After 24 months, a significant improvement was found (P = .041). After the four weeks lasting sham vs. DBS-ON period, there was no group difference (P = .376) in HAMD-24 and patients did not improve during sham stimulation. Patients were followed until 28 months and two up to 4 years under SCG-DBS and average response rate was 51%, whereas two patients were remitters (33,3%). LIMITATIONS: The small sample size limited the statistical power and external validity.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term improvement after SCG-DBS revealed a stable effect. There was no significant difference in response rates between the delayed and non-delayed-onset group. DBS for TRD remains experimental and longitudinal investigations of large samples are needed.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affective disorders; Cg25; Deep brain stimulation; Depression; Subcallosal cingulate gyrus; Treatment-resistant

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29161674     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  20 in total

Review 1.  A narrative review on invasive brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Manoj P Dandekar; Alexandre P Diaz; Ziaur Rahman; Ritele H Silva; Ziad Nahas; Scott Aaronson; Sudhakar Selvaraj; Albert J Fenoy; Marsal Sanches; Jair C Soares; Patricio Riva-Posse; Joao Quevedo
Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry       Date:  2022 May-Jun

2.  Imaging versus electrographic connectivity in human mood-related fronto-temporal networks.

Authors:  Joshua A Adkinson; Evangelia Tsolaki; Sameer A Sheth; Brian A Metzger; Meghan E Robinson; Denise Oswalt; Cameron C McIntyre; Raissa K Mathura; Allison C Waters; Anusha B Allawala; Angela M Noecker; Mahsa Malekmohammadi; Kevin Chiu; Richard Mustakos; Wayne Goodman; David Borton; Nader Pouratian; Kelly R Bijanki
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 9.184

Review 3.  Biomarkers for Deep Brain Stimulation in Animal Models of Depression.

Authors:  Jason Yuen; Aaron E Rusheen; Joshua Blair Price; Abhijeet S Barath; Hojin Shin; Abbas Z Kouzani; Michael Berk; Charles D Blaha; Kendall H Lee; Yoonbae Oh
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2022-02

Review 4.  Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: an integrative review of preclinical and clinical findings and translational implications.

Authors:  M P Dandekar; A J Fenoy; A F Carvalho; J C Soares; J Quevedo
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 5.  Invasive Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Psychiatric Illness–Proposed Indications and Approaches.

Authors:  Thomas E Schläpfer; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Matthis Synofzik; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle; Jürgen Voges; Volker A Coenen
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Efficacy and feasibility of deep brain stimulation for patients with depression: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongli Zhang; Na Wang; Liping Yu; Min Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Anatomical Connectivity-Based Strategy for Targeting Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as Antidepressant Therapy.

Authors:  Qi Tao; Yongfeng Yang; Hongyan Yu; Lingzhong Fan; Shuxin Luan; Lei Zhang; Hua Zhao; Luxian Lv; Tianzi Jiang; Xueqin Song
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Long-term deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule for treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Junus M van der Wal; Isidoor O Bergfeld; Anja Lok; Mariska Mantione; Martijn Figee; Peter Notten; Guus Beute; Ferdinand Horst; Pepijn van den Munckhof; P Rick Schuurman; Damiaan Denys
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 9.  Biomarkers for Deep Brain Stimulation in Animal Models of Depression.

Authors:  Jason Yuen; Aaron E Rusheen; Joshua Blair Price; Abhijeet S Barath; Hojin Shin; Abbas Z Kouzani; Michael Berk; Charles D Blaha; Kendall H Lee; Yoonbae Oh
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-06-09

10.  Enriched Environment Facilitates Anxiolytic Efficacy Driven by Deep-Brain Stimulation of Medial Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Yamini Bhaskar; Lee Wei Lim; Rupshi Mitra
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.