Literature DB >> 29161668

Patterns of C-reactive protein ratio response to antibiotics in pediatric sepsis: A prospective cohort study.

Vanessa Soares Lanziotti1, Pedro Póvoa2, Arnaldo Prata-Barbosa3, Lucas Berbet Pulcheri4, Ligia S C F Rabello5, José Roberto Lapa E Silva6, Marcio Soares5, Jorge I F Salluh5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evaluate sequential C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements and patterns of CRP-ratio response to antibiotic therapy during first 7days in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) of septic children.
METHODS: Prospective, cohort study of children (1month-12years) admitted at 3 PICUs, with diagnosis of sepsis with <72h course. CRP-ratio was calculated in relation to D0_CRP value. Children were classified according to an individual pattern of CRP-ratio response: fast - CRP_D4 of therapy was <0.4 of D0_CRP; slow - continuous but slow decrease of CRP; non - CRP remained ≥0.8 of D0_CRP; biphasic - initial CRP decrease to levels <0.8 of D0_CRP followed by secondary rise ≥0.8.
RESULTS: 103 septic children (age-median: 2yrs; 54% male) were prospectively included (infection focus: 65% respiratory, 12.5% central nervous system). Overall PICU mortality was 11.7%. 102 children could be classified according to a predefined CRP-ratio response pattern. Time-dependent analysis of CRP-ratio and CRP course of the different patterns were significantly different. Besides, PICU mortality rate was significantly different according CRP-ratio response patterns: fast response 4.5%; slow response 5.8%; non-response 29.4%; biphasic response 42.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric sepsis, CRP-ratio serial evaluation was useful in early identification of patients with poor outcome.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; C-reactive protein; Children; Outcome; Pediatric intensive care unit; Sepsis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29161668     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  6 in total

Review 1.  Endothelial Damage in Sepsis: The Importance of Systems Biology.

Authors:  Jaime Fernández-Sarmiento; Luregn J Schlapbach; Lorena Acevedo; Carolina Ramírez Santana; Yeny Acosta; Ampudia Diana; M Monsalve; Joseph A Carcillo
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.418

2.  Criteria for Pediatric Sepsis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Pediatric Sepsis Definition Taskforce.

Authors:  Kusum Menon; Luregn J Schlapbach; Samuel Akech; Andrew Argent; Paolo Biban; Enitan D Carrol; Kathleen Chiotos; Mohammod Jobayer Chisti; Idris V R Evans; David P Inwald; Paul Ishimine; Niranjan Kissoon; Rakesh Lodha; Simon Nadel; Cláudio Flauzino Oliveira; Mark Peters; Benham Sadeghirad; Halden F Scott; Daniela C de Souza; Pierre Tissieres; R Scott Watson; Matthew O Wiens; James L Wynn; Jerry J Zimmerman; Lauren R Sorce
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 9.296

3.  Pediatric infection and sepsis in five age subgroups: single-center registry.

Authors:  Michael M Hermon; Theresa Etmayr; Jennifer Bettina Brandt; Kambis Sadeghi; Gudrun Burda; Johann Golej
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2020-10-27

Review 4.  Septic shock in pediatrics: the state-of-the-art.

Authors:  Pedro Celiny Ramos Garcia; Cristian Tedesco Tonial; Jefferson Pedro Piva
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 2.990

5.  Pediatric Sepsis: Subphenotypes to Enrich Clinical Trial Entry Criteria.

Authors:  Vanessa Soares Lanziotti; Jorge I F Salluh
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.971

6.  Performance of prognostic markers in pediatric sepsis.

Authors:  Cristian Tedesco Tonial; Caroline Abud Drumond Costa; Gabriela Rupp Hanzen Andrades; Francielly Crestani; Francisco Bruno; Jefferson Pedro Piva; Pedro Celiny Ramos Garcia
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.990

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.