Literature DB >> 29160656

Linking removal targets to the ecological effects of invaders: a predictive model and field test.

Stephanie J Green, Nicholas K Dulvy, Annabelle M L Brooks, John L Akins, Skylar Miller, Isabelle M Côté.   

Abstract

Species invasions have a range of negative effects on recipient ecosystems, and many occur at a scale and magnitude that preclude complete eradication. When complete extirpation is unlikely with available management resources, an effective strategy may be to suppress invasive populations below levels predicted to cause undesirable ecological change. We illustrated this approach by developing and testing targets for the control of invasive Indo-Pacific lionfish (Pterois volitans and P. miles) on Western Atlantic coral reefs. We first developed a size-structured simulation model of predation by lionfish on native fish communities, which we used to predict threshold densities of lionfish beyond which native fish biomass should decline. We then tested our predictions by experimentally manipulating lionfish densities above or below reef-specific thresholds, and monitoring the consequences for native fish populations on 24 Bahamian patch reefs over 18 months. We found that reducing lionfish below predicted threshold densities effectively protected native fish community biomass from predation-induced declines. Reductions in density of 25–92%, depending on the reef, were required to suppress lionfish below levels predicted to overconsume prey. On reefs where lionfish were kept below threshold densities, native prey fish biomass increased by 50–70%. Gains in small (<6 cm) size classes of native fishes translated into lagged increases in larger size classes over time. The biomass of larger individuals (>15 cm total length), including ecologically important grazers and economically important fisheries species, had increased by 10–65% by the end of the experiment. Crucially, similar gains in prey fish biomass were realized on reefs subjected to partial and full removal of lionfish, but partial removals took 30% less time to implement. By contrast, the biomass of small native fishes declined by >50% on all reefs with lionfish densities exceeding reef-specific thresholds. Large inter-reef variation in the biomass of prey fishes at the outset of the study, which influences the threshold density of lionfish, means that we could not identify a single rule of thumb for guiding control efforts. However, our model provides a method for setting reef-specific targets for population control using local monitoring data. Our work is the first to demonstrate that for ongoing invasions, suppressing invaders below densities that cause environmental harm can have a similar effect, in terms of protecting the native ecosystem on a local scale, to achieving complete eradication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 29160656     DOI: 10.1890/13-0979.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  21 in total

1.  Global ecological impacts of marine exotic species.

Authors:  Andrea Anton; Nathan R Geraldi; Catherine E Lovelock; Eugenia T Apostolaki; Scott Bennett; Just Cebrian; Dorte Krause-Jensen; Nuria Marbà; Paulina Martinetto; John M Pandolfi; Julia Santana-Garcon; Carlos M Duarte
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 15.460

2.  From individual movement behaviour to landscape-scale invasion dynamics and management: a case study of lionfish metapopulations.

Authors:  Natascia Tamburello; Brian O Ma; Isabelle M Côté
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.671

3.  Re-examining the relationship between invasive lionfish and native grouper in the Caribbean.

Authors:  Abel Valdivia; John F Bruno; Courtney E Cox; Serena Hackerott; Stephanie J Green
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.061

4.  Environmental and biotic correlates to lionfish invasion success in Bahamian coral reefs.

Authors:  Andrea Anton; Michael S Simpson; Ivana Vu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Simulations indicate that scores of lionfish (Pterois volitans) colonized the Atlantic Ocean.

Authors:  Jason D Selwyn; John E Johnson; Alan M Downey-Wall; Adam M Bynum; Rebecca M Hamner; J Derek Hogan; Christopher E Bird
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.061

6.  Lionfish predators use flared fin displays to initiate cooperative hunting.

Authors:  Oona M Lönnstedt; Maud C O Ferrari; Douglas P Chivers
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.812

7.  What doesn't kill you makes you wary? Effect of repeated culling on the behaviour of an invasive predator.

Authors:  Isabelle M Côté; Emily S Darling; Luis Malpica-Cruz; Nicola S Smith; Stephanie J Green; Jocelyn Curtis-Quick; Craig Layman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Spatial and temporal distribution of the invasive lionfish Pterois volitans in coral reefs of Tayrona National Natural Park, Colombian Caribbean.

Authors:  Elisa Bayraktarov; Javier Alarcón-Moscoso; Andrea Polanco F; Christian Wild
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.061

9.  Age, growth and population structure of invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans/miles) in northeast Florida using a length-based, age-structured population model.

Authors:  Eric G Johnson; Mary Katherine Swenarton
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.061

10.  Invasive lionfish reduce native fish abundance on a regional scale.

Authors:  Nicholas G Ballew; Nathan M Bacheler; G Todd Kellison; Amy M Schueller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.