Mariana T Garcia1, Silvana M Ribeiro1, Ana Claudia Camargo Gonçalves Germani2, Cláudia M Bógus1. 1. 1Department of Public Health Practice,School of Public Health,University of São Paulo,Av. Dr Arnaldo 715,Room 7,CEP 01246-904,São Paulo,SP,Brazil. 2. 2Department of Preventive Medicine,University of São Paulo Medical School,São Paulo,SP,Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impacts on food and nutrition-related outcomes resulting from participation in urban gardens, especially on healthy food practices, healthy food access, and healthy food beliefs, knowledge and attitudes. DESIGN: The systematic review identified studies by searching the PubMed, ERIC, LILACS, Web of Science and Embase databases. An assessment of quality and bias risk of the studies was carried out and a narrative summary was produced. SETTING: Studies published as original articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals in English, Spanish or Portuguese between 2005 and 2015 were included. SUBJECTS: The studies included were based on data from adult participants in urban gardens. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were initially selected based on the eligibility criteria, twelve of which were included. There was important heterogeneity of settings, population and assessment methods. Assessment of quality and bias risk of the studies revealed the need for greater methodological rigour. Most studies investigated community gardens and employed a qualitative approach. The following were reported: greater fruit and vegetable consumption, better access to healthy foods, greater valuing of cooking, harvest sharing with family and friends, enhanced importance of organic production, and valuing of adequate and healthy food. CONCLUSIONS: Thematic patterns related to adequate and healthy food associated with participation in urban gardens were identified, revealing a positive impact on practices of adequate and healthy food and mainly on food perceptions.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impacts on food and nutrition-related outcomes resulting from participation in urban gardens, especially on healthy food practices, healthy food access, and healthy food beliefs, knowledge and attitudes. DESIGN: The systematic review identified studies by searching the PubMed, ERIC, LILACS, Web of Science and Embase databases. An assessment of quality and bias risk of the studies was carried out and a narrative summary was produced. SETTING: Studies published as original articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals in English, Spanish or Portuguese between 2005 and 2015 were included. SUBJECTS: The studies included were based on data from adult participants in urban gardens. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were initially selected based on the eligibility criteria, twelve of which were included. There was important heterogeneity of settings, population and assessment methods. Assessment of quality and bias risk of the studies revealed the need for greater methodological rigour. Most studies investigated community gardens and employed a qualitative approach. The following were reported: greater fruit and vegetable consumption, better access to healthy foods, greater valuing of cooking, harvest sharing with family and friends, enhanced importance of organic production, and valuing of adequate and healthy food. CONCLUSIONS: Thematic patterns related to adequate and healthy food associated with participation in urban gardens were identified, revealing a positive impact on practices of adequate and healthy food and mainly on food perceptions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adult; Age; Attitude to health; Food habits; Gardening
Authors: Clare Hume; Jessica A Grieger; Anna Kalamkarian; Katina D'Onise; Lisa G Smithers Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Colleen K Spees; Ashlea C Braun; Emily B Hill; Elizabeth M Grainger; James Portner; Gregory S Young; Matthew D Kleinhenz; Chureeporn Chitchumroonchokchai; Steven K Clinton Journal: J Oncol Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 4.375
Authors: Danielle Tracey; Tonia Gray; Joanna Sweeting; Jonathan Kingsley; Aisling Bailey; Philip Pettitt Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-19 Impact factor: 3.390