Literature DB >> 2915974

Topology of cell adhesion molecules.

J W Becker1, H P Erickson, S Hoffman, B A Cunningham, G M Edelman.   

Abstract

The neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) exists in two major forms [ld (large cytoplasmic domain) peptide and sd (small cytoplasmic domain) peptide] that contain transmembrane segments and different cytoplasmic domains and in a third form [ssd (small surface domain) peptide] that lacks transmembrane and cytoplasmic regions. All forms have the same extracellular region of more than 600 amino acid residues, a region also found in a fragment (Fr2) that can be released from cells by proteolysis. The liver cell adhesion molecule (L-CAM) is expressed as a single species that is distinct from N-CAM, but its extracellular region can also be obtained as a proteolytic fragment (Ft1). Examination of the various forms of N-CAM and the Ft1 fragment of L-CAM by electron microscopy of rotary shadowed molecules indicated that they all have rod-shaped structures that contain a hinge region which is apparently flexible. Both the ssd chain and the Fr2 fragment of N-CAM are single rods bent into arms approximately 18 and 10 nm long. The ld and sd chains are longer bent rods that form rosettes comprising two to six branches; detergent treatment disrupts these rosettes into single rods. Specific antibodies that block homophilic N-CAM binding labeled the distal ends of the branches of the ld/sd rosettes and the ends of the longer arm of both the ssd chain and the Fr2 fragment. Antibodies that bind to the sialic acid-rich region of N-CAM bound near the hinge. These data indicate that the N-CAM rosettes are formed by interaction between their transmembrane or cytoplasmic domains and not by interactions involving their homophilic binding sites. The L-CAM Ft1 fragment is also a bent rod with an apparently flexible hinge; like the ssd chain and the Fr2 fragment of N-CAM, it does not form aggregates. The similarities between L-CAM and N-CAM, despite their differences in amino acid sequence, suggest that their general configuration and the presence of a flexible hinge are important elements in assuring effective and specific cell-cell adhesion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2915974      PMCID: PMC286627          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.86.3.1088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  42 in total

1.  Sequence of a cDNA clone encoding the polysialic acid-rich and cytoplasmic domains of the neural cell adhesion molecule N-CAM.

Authors:  J J Hemperly; B A Murray; G M Edelman; B A Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Soluble 80-kd fragment of cell-CAM 120/80 disrupts cell-cell adhesion.

Authors:  M J Wheelock; C A Buck; K B Bechtol; C H Damsky
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.429

3.  Neural cell adhesion molecule: structure, immunoglobulin-like domains, cell surface modulation, and alternative RNA splicing.

Authors:  B A Cunningham; J J Hemperly; B A Murray; E A Prediger; R Brackenbury; G M Edelman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  The immunoglobulin superfamily--domains for cell surface recognition.

Authors:  A F Williams; A N Barclay
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 28.527

5.  Organization of the neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) gene: alternative exon usage as the basis for different membrane-associated domains.

Authors:  G C Owens; G M Edelman; B A Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Sequence analysis of a cDNA clone encoding the liver cell adhesion molecule, L-CAM.

Authors:  W J Gallin; B C Sorkin; G M Edelman; B A Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  cDNA clones of the neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) lacking a membrane-spanning region consistent with evidence for membrane attachment via a phosphatidylinositol intermediate.

Authors:  J J Hemperly; G M Edelman; B A Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Molecular cloning and primary structure of myelin-associated glycoprotein.

Authors:  M Arquint; J Roder; L S Chia; J Down; D Wilkinson; H Bayley; P Braun; R Dunn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Visualization of neural cell adhesion molecule by electron microscopy.

Authors:  A K Hall; U Rutishauser
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Biosynthesis of the neural cell adhesion molecule: characterization of polypeptide C.

Authors:  O Nybroe; M Albrechtsen; J Dahlin; D Linnemann; J M Lyles; C J Møller; E Bock
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Mucins and blastocyst attachment.

Authors:  Amantha Thathiah; Daniel D Carson
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  The neural cell adhesion molecule N-CAM enhances L1-dependent cell-cell interactions.

Authors:  G Kadmon; A Kowitz; P Altevogt; M Schachner
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 10.539

3.  Isolation and characterization of a cDNA clone encoding avian skeletal muscle C-protein: an intracellular member of the immunoglobulin superfamily.

Authors:  S Einheber; D A Fischman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Structure and mutagenesis of neural cell adhesion molecule domains: evidence for flexibility in the placement of polysialic acid attachment sites.

Authors:  Deirdre A Foley; Kristin G Swartzentruber; Arnon Lavie; Karen J Colley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Epithelial cell adhesion mechanisms.

Authors:  B Boyer; J P Thiery
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  The microRNA bantam regulates a developmental transition in epithelial cells that restricts sensory dendrite growth.

Authors:  Nan Jiang; Peter Soba; Edward Parker; Charles C Kim; Jay Z Parrish
Journal:  Development       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  Binding of the sialic acid-binding lectin, Siglec-9, to the membrane mucin, MUC1, induces recruitment of β-catenin and subsequent cell growth.

Authors:  Shuhei Tanida; Kaoru Akita; Akiko Ishida; Yugo Mori; Munetoyo Toda; Mizue Inoue; Mariko Ohta; Masakazu Yashiro; Tetsuji Sawada; Kosei Hirakawa; Hiroshi Nakada
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Mechanism of homophilic adhesion by the neural cell adhesion molecule: use of multiple domains and flexibility.

Authors:  C P Johnson; I Fujimoto; C Perrin-Tricaud; U Rutishauser; D Leckband
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  The oncofetal Thomsen-Friedenreich carbohydrate antigen in cancer progression.

Authors:  Lu-Gang Yu
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 2.916

10.  Removal of sialic acid from the surface of human MCF-7 mammary cancer cells abolishes E-cadherin-dependent cell-cell adhesion in an aggregation assay.

Authors:  J J Deman; N A Van Larebeke; E A Bruyneel; M E Bracke; S J Vermeulen; K M Vennekens; M M Mareel
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.