| Literature DB >> 29159429 |
Ya-Sheng Huang1,2, Qi-Qi Yu2, Yin Chen2, Min-Jie Cheng2, Li-Ping Xie3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The plant Alisma plantago-aquatica Linnaeus, which is widely distributed in southwest of China, is the main material of traditional Chinese medicine "Zexie". It was used as folk medicine for immune-modulation, anti-tumor, anti-inflammatory and antibacterial. Previous chemical studies on A. plantago-aquatica reported the identification of triterpenes, diterpenes, sesquiterpenes, steroids, alkaloids and phenolic acid. Terpenes and phenolic acid were regard as major secondary metabolites from this medicine plant.Entities:
Keywords: A. plantago-aquatica; Chronic prostatitis; Plantain A
Year: 2017 PMID: 29159429 PMCID: PMC5696274 DOI: 10.1186/s13065-017-0350-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Cent J ISSN: 1752-153X Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Chemical structures of compounds 1–5 isolated from A. plantago-aquatica
Fig. 21H-1HCOSY and key HMBC correlations of 1
Fig. 3Key ROESY correlations of compound 1
Effect of compounds 1–5 on TNF-α, IL-1β, PGE2, COX-2,TGF-β1 levels
| Group | TNF-α (pg/mL) | IL-1β (pg/mL) | PGE2 | COX-2 | TGF-β1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 91.4 ± 6.1** | 89.3 ± 7.2** | 57.2 ± 9.3** | 17.1 ± 3.7** | 84.8 ± 9.9** |
| Negative control | 173.8 ± 11.2 | 160.3 ± 10.1 | 130.2 ± 6.9 | 41.4 ± 1.9 | 133.1 ± 10.2 |
| Cernilton | 121.1 ± 10.5** | 132.4 ± 9.7** | 80.3 ± 5.7** | 20.3 ± 2.4** | 119.4 ± 11.7* |
| 1 | 101.7 ± 9.9** | 124.8 ± 8.0** | 119.7 ± 10.9* | 26.8 ± 4.1** | 101.6 ± 9.7** |
| 2 | 169.3 ± 11.7 | 156.7 ± 12.6 | 128.1 ± 11.7 | 39.7 ± 8.5 | 131.1 ± 12.2 |
| 3 | 161.1 ± 14.5 | 151.9 ± 10.3 | 125.7 ± 10.3 | 37.8 ± 6.2 | 129.8 ± 11.5 |
| 4 | 118.6 ± 10.3** | 147.5 ± 11.2* | 117.4 ± 8.3** | 30.3 ± 1.8** | 120.3 ± 11.4* |
| 5 | 170.1 ± 9.4 | 159.9 ± 12.7 | 129.1 ± 11.9 | 40.1 ± 5.9 | 130.6 ± 10.3 |
Cernilton was tested at a dose of 30 mg/kg, the five compounds (1–5) were tested at a dose of 50 mg/kg
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, significant as compared to the negative control group; Values are mean ± SD (n = 10)
13C- and 1H-NMR data of 1 in DMSO-d (400 MHz for H, 100 MHz for C)
| No. | C | H | No. | C | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1″ | 131.5 | |||
| 2 | 157.8 | 2″ | 117.8 | 6.70 (1H, d, | |
| 3 | 99.2 | 6.73 (1H, s) | 3″ | 146.1 | |
| 3a | 127.9 | 4″ | 145.4 | ||
| 4 | 120.6 | 5″ | 115.5 | 6.86 (1H, d, | |
| 5 | 133.9 | 7.49 (1H, d, | 6″ | 121.4 | 6.60 (1H, dd, |
| 6 | 111.4 | 6.67 (1H, d, | 7″ | 36.6 | 3.06 (1H, dd, |
| 7 | 147.4 | 2.93 (1H, dd, | |||
| 7a | 142.8 | 8″ | 73.5 | 5.11 (1H, dd, | |
| 8 | 145.7 | 7.86 (1H, d, | 9″ | 170.5 | |
| 9 | 119.5 | 6.55 (1H, d, | 1′′′ | 144.5 | |
| 10 | 166.7 | 2′′′ | 151.3 | ||
| 1′ | 120.6 | 3′′′ | 114.3 | 7.52 (1H, d, | |
| 2′ | 112.9 | 7.41 (1H, d, | 4′′′ | 129.2 | |
| 3′ | 147.8 | 5′′′ | 126.3 | 7.48 (1H, d, | |
| 4′ | 148.8 | 6′′′ | 123.0 | 7.36 (1H, dd, | |
| 5′ | 116.5 | 6.78 (1H, d, | COOH | 168.4 | 10.78 (1H, s) |
| 6′ | 117.2 | 7.38 (1H, dd, | OCH3 | 55.9 | 3.75 (3H, s) |