Literature DB >> 29159222

Data on metagenomic profiles of activated sludge from a full-scale wastewater treatment plant.

Jianhua Guo1,2, Bing-Jie Ni1, Xiaoyu Han3, Xueming Chen1, Philip Bond1, Yongzhen Peng2, Zhiguo Yuan1.   

Abstract

The data in this article mainly present the sequences of activated sludge from a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) carrying out simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorous removal in Beijing, China. Data include the operational conditions and performance, dominant microbes and taxonomic analysis in this WWTP, and function annotation results based on SEED, Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases. Sequencing data were generated by using Illumina HiSeq. 2000 platform according to the recommendations of the manufacturer. The sequencing data have been deposited in MG-RAST server (project ID: mgm4735473.3). For more information, see "Unraveling microbial structure and diversity of activated sludge in a full-scale simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal plant using metagenomic sequencing" by Guo et al. (2017) [1].

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29159222      PMCID: PMC5676080          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the data Data will be useful for investigating microbial community structure in wastewater treatment plants carrying out simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Data can be used to predict possible nitrogen conversation pathways in biological nitrogen removal systems from wastewater. Sequencing data can be used to identify core microbes by comparing to similar data sets generated for simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal plants with different treatment processes. Accessibility of metagenomic sequence data allows researchers to perform new analyses with their own research purposes.

Data

Data on microbial community and functional profiles within activated sludge from a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) carrying out simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorous removal (SNPR) are presented [1]. Data include the operational conditions and performance of this WWTP (Table 1), dominant microbes and taxonomic analysis (Table 2 and Fig. 1), and function annotations based on SEED, Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5).
Table 1

Operational conditions and pollutant removal performance of the full-scale WWTP (The data are collected from 6 months prior to the sampling).

UnitT (oC)DO (mg/L)MLSS (mg/L)Influent
Effluent
CODBOD5SSNH4+-NTPCODBOD5SSNH4+-NNO2--NNO3--NTP
(mg/L)(mg/L)(mg/L)(mg/L)(mg/L)(mg/L)(mg/L)(mg/L)(mg/L)(mg/L)(mg/L)(mg/L)
Range13.2–24.50.3–7.53340–5135167–87058.6–435.090–97027.4–49.32.8–9.031.2–46.52.1–9.08–190.2–12.80–4.412.6–23.30.2–1.6
Average17.65.24246432188.632039.65.939.25.1122.30.115.80.7
STD3.41.543213063.41854.71.13.31.71.92.10.62.00.3

T: temperature; MLSS: mixed liquor suspended solid; SS: suspended solids; TP: total phosphorus.

Table 2

Abundances of dominant class in the activated sludge sample (the taxonomic classification was preformed by search the contigs against the NCBI NT database using SOAP2 (v2.21, with the default settings).

PhylumClassAbundance percentage (%)
ProteobacteriaBetaproteobacteria46.19
Gammaproteobacteria11.14
Alphaproteobacteria8.19
Deltaproteobacteria1.51
Epsilonproteobacteria0.07
NitrospiraeNitrospira15.4
BacteroidetesFlavobacteriia3.00
Sphingobacteriia3.07
Cytophagia1.44
Bacteroidia0.32
Ignavibacteria0.11
ActinobacteriaActinobacteria1.53
Gemmatimonadetes0.39
Acidobacteriia0.15
Solibacteres0.14
FirmicutesClostridia0.34
Bacilli0.21
Negativicutes0.02
EuryarchaeotaMethanomicrobia0.07
Halobacteria0.03
Thermoplasmata0.03
Fig. 1

The Krona chart of the full taxonomy.

Fig. 2

Abundances of major Level 2 subsystems in the sample derived from Level 1 subsystem of carbohydrate based on SEED subsystems (The E-value cutoff of 10−5 and minimum alignment length of 17 amino acids was used as the annotation parameters).

Fig. 3

Potential function of genes detected in the activated sludge metagenome based on COG annotation. COG subcategories are listed on the left, and the corresponding major categories are listed on the right.

Fig. 4

KEGG mapper for the activated sludge. The highlighted line in blue represents the existing pathways in the sample.

Fig. 5

Abundance of nitrogen metabolism sequences from the metagenome based on classification into Level 2 SEED subsystems.

The Krona chart of the full taxonomy. Abundances of major Level 2 subsystems in the sample derived from Level 1 subsystem of carbohydrate based on SEED subsystems (The E-value cutoff of 10−5 and minimum alignment length of 17 amino acids was used as the annotation parameters). Potential function of genes detected in the activated sludge metagenome based on COG annotation. COG subcategories are listed on the left, and the corresponding major categories are listed on the right. KEGG mapper for the activated sludge. The highlighted line in blue represents the existing pathways in the sample. Abundance of nitrogen metabolism sequences from the metagenome based on classification into Level 2 SEED subsystems. Operational conditions and pollutant removal performance of the full-scale WWTP (The data are collected from 6 months prior to the sampling). T: temperature; MLSS: mixed liquor suspended solid; SS: suspended solids; TP: total phosphorus. Abundances of dominant class in the activated sludge sample (the taxonomic classification was preformed by search the contigs against the NCBI NT database using SOAP2 (v2.21, with the default settings).

Experimental design, materials and methods

Sampling of activated sludge

A 50 mL sample of activated sludge was taken using a plastic dipper from an aeration tank of a full-scale WWTP in Beijing (China). This WWTP treats a mean influent flow of 1×106 m3/day. The preliminary wastewater treatment consists of bar screens, aerated grit chambers and primary sedimentation. The plant has an Anaerobic-Anoxic-Oxic (A2O) configuration, in which nitrification, denitrification and biological phosphorous removal are simultaneously achieved. The hydraulic retention time is around 6–8 h and the solids retention time is 10–15 days. The excess sludge from the biological treatment settles down in the secondary clarifiers and enters the sludge treatment together. The sludge treatment consists of thickening tanks, anaerobic mesophilic digestion and dewatering.

DNA extraction

Briefly, 2 mL sample was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C and the sludge pellet was collected. DNA extraction was performed using the FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil (QBIOgene, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the kit manufacturer's instructions. DNA integrity was estimated through gel electrophoresis (1% agarose) and DNA concentrations were measured by using a Qubit Fluorometer (Thermo, USA).

DNA library construction and sequencing

The metagenomic sequencing was performed using Illumina HiSeq. 2000 platform. For library construction, the extracted DNA sample was processed according to the Paired-end Genomic DNA Sample Prep Kit protocol (Illumina) for generating 2×100 bp paired-ends reads. Briefly, DNA fragmentation was performed using the Covaris S2 Ultrasonicator. Then, the DNA fragments were subjected to end-repair, A-tailing, and adapter ligation. After DNA size-selection, PCR amplification and amplicon purification a ~170 bp DNA fragment library was constructed for further sequencing. The base-calling pipeline (version Illumina Pipeline-0.3) was used to generate sequences. In this study, 4.5 Gb reads were generated for the metagenomic dataset. Quality filtering was performed as described previously [3] by removing raw reads that: contained more than 3 ambiguous nucleotides, were shorter than 35 bp, had more than 15 bp overlap with adapter sequences, included more than 36 nucleotides with quality value lower than 20, or were potential duplicated reads due to amplification artifacts. After quality filtering, a total of above 4.0 Gb high-quality DNA reads were used to assemble them into contigs using SOAPdenovo assembler (v 1.05, set as -p 8 -F -M 3 -D 1 -L 90 -u) [4]. The detailed pipeline for bioinformatic analyses can be found in our study [1].
Subject areaBiology
More specific subject areaBiological wastewater treatment
Type of dataTable, graph and metagenomic sequences
How data was acquiredDNA sequencing using Illumina HiSeq. 2000 platform
Data formatRaw and filtered
Experimental factorsDNA extracted from activated sludge
Experimental featuresActivated sludge was taken from an aeration tank of a full-scale WWTP in Beijing (China). Metagenomic sequencing was performed using Illumina HiSeq. 2000 platform according to the recommendations of the manufacturer.
Data source locationBeijing, China
Data accessibilityData about community structure and function annotation are available with this article. The sequencing data have been deposited in MG-RAST (project ID: mgm4735473.3)[2].
  4 in total

1.  Metagenomic analysis of anammox communities in three different microbial aggregates.

Authors:  Jianhua Guo; Yongzhen Peng; Lu Fan; Liang Zhang; Bing-Jie Ni; Boran Kartal; Xin Feng; Mike S M Jetten; Zhiguo Yuan
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 5.491

2.  Unraveling microbial structure and diversity of activated sludge in a full-scale simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal plant using metagenomic sequencing.

Authors:  Jianhua Guo; Bing-Jie Ni; Xiaoyu Han; Xueming Chen; Philip Bond; Yongzhen Peng; Zhiguo Yuan
Journal:  Enzyme Microb Technol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.493

3.  SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program.

Authors:  Ruiqiang Li; Yingrui Li; Karsten Kristiansen; Jun Wang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  The metagenomics RAST server - a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes.

Authors:  F Meyer; D Paarmann; M D'Souza; R Olson; E M Glass; M Kubal; T Paczian; A Rodriguez; R Stevens; A Wilke; J Wilkening; R A Edwards
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparative diversity of microbiomes and Resistomes in beef feedlots, downstream environments and urban sewage influent.

Authors:  Rahat Zaheer; Steven M Lakin; Rodrigo Ortega Polo; Shaun R Cook; Francis J Larney; Paul S Morley; Calvin W Booker; Sherry J Hannon; Gary Van Domselaar; Ron R Read; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.605

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.