Literature DB >> 29157459

A computer-aided diagnosis system for breast ultrasound based on weighted BI-RADS classes.

Arturo Rodríguez-Cristerna1, Wilfrido Gómez-Flores2, Wagner Coelho de Albuquerque Pereira3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Conventional computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems for breast ultrasound (BUS) are trained to classify pathological classes, that is, benign and malignant. However, from a clinical perspective, this kind of classification does not agree totally with radiologists' diagnoses. Usually, the tumors are assessed by using a BI-RADS (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System) category and, accordingly, a recommendation is emitted: annual study for category 2 (benign), six-month follow-up study for category 3 (probably benign), and biopsy for categories 4 and 5 (suspicious of malignancy). Hence, in this paper, a CAD system based on BI-RADS categories weighted by pathological information is presented. The goal is to increase the classification performance by reducing the common class imbalance found in pathological classes as well as to provide outcomes quite similar to radiologists' recommendations.
METHODS: The BUS dataset considers 781 benign lesions and 347 malignant tumors proven by biopsy. Moreover, every lesion is associated to one BI-RADS category in the set {2, 3, 4, 5}. Thus, the dataset is split into three weighted classes: benign, BI-RADS 2 in benign lesions; probably benign, BI-RADS 3 and 4 in benign lesions; and malignant, BI-RADS 4 and 5 in malignant lesions. Thereafter, a random forest (RF) classifier, denoted by RFw, is trained to predict the weighted BI-RADS classes. In addition, for comparison purposes, a RF classifier is trained to predict pathological classes, denoted as RFp.
RESULTS: The ability of the classifiers to predict the pathological classes is measured by the area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity (SEN), and specificity (SPE). The RFw classifier obtained AUC=0.872,SEN=0.826, and SPE=0.919, whereas the RFp classifier reached AUC=0.868,SEN=0.808, and SPE=0.929. According to a one-way analysis of variance test, the RFw classifier statistically outperforms (p < 0.001) the RFp classifier in terms of the AUC and SEN. Moreover, the classification performance of RFw to predict weighted BI-RADS classes is given by the Matthews correlation coefficient that obtained 0.614.
CONCLUSIONS: The division of the classification problem into three classes reduces the imbalance between benign and malignant classes; thus, the sensitivity is increased without degrading the specificity. Therefore, the CAD based on weighted BI-RADS classes improves the classification performance of the conventional CAD systems. Additionally, the proposed approach has the advantage of being capable of providing a multiclass outcome related to radiologists' recommendations.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BI-RADS; Breast cancer; Computer-aided diagnosis; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29157459     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed        ISSN: 0169-2607            Impact factor:   5.428


  6 in total

1.  Reviewing Machine Learning and Image Processing Based Decision-Making Systems for Breast Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  Hasnae Zerouaoui; Ali Idri
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  Computer-aided diagnosis in rheumatic diseases using ultrasound: an overview.

Authors:  Josefina Gutiérrez-Martínez; Carlos Pineda; Hugo Sandoval; Araceli Bernal-González
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  A Benign and Malignant Breast Tumor Classification Method via Efficiently Combining Texture and Morphological Features on Ultrasound Images.

Authors:  Mengwan Wei; Yongzhao Du; Xiuming Wu; Qichen Su; Jianqing Zhu; Lixin Zheng; Guorong Lv; Jiafu Zhuang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.238

4.  Combinatorial active contour bilateral filter for ultrasound image segmentation.

Authors:  Anan Nugroho; Risanuri Hidayat; Hanung A Nugroho; Johan Debayle
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-10-27

5.  Application of ultrasound artificial intelligence in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions of BI-RADS 4A.

Authors:  Sihua Niu; Jianhua Huang; Jia Li; Xueling Liu; Dan Wang; Ruifang Zhang; Yingyan Wang; Huiming Shen; Min Qi; Yi Xiao; Mengyao Guan; Haiyan Liu; Diancheng Li; Feifei Liu; Xiuming Wang; Yu Xiong; Siqi Gao; Xue Wang; Jiaan Zhu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Influence of the Computer-Aided Decision Support System Design on Ultrasound-Based Breast Cancer Classification.

Authors:  Zuzanna Anna Magnuska; Benjamin Theek; Milita Darguzyte; Moritz Palmowski; Elmar Stickeler; Volkmar Schulz; Fabian Kießling
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.