Literature DB >> 29157316

EVALUATION OF THE HTA CORE MODEL FOR NATIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORTS: COMPARATIVE STUDY AND EXPERIENCES FROM EUROPEAN COUNTRIES.

Kristina Kõrge1, Nadine Berndt2, Juergen Hohmann3, Florence Romano4, Mickael Hiligsmann5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The health technology assessment (HTA) Core Model® is a tool for defining and standardizing the elements of HTA analyses within several domains for producing structured reports. This study explored the parallels between the Core Model and a national HTA report. Experiences from various European HTA agencies were also investigated to determine the Core Model's adaptability to national reports.
METHODS: A comparison between a national report on Genetic Counseling, produced by the Cellule d'expertise médicale Luxembourg, and the Core Model was performed to identify parallels in terms of relevant and comparable assessment elements (AEs). Semi-structured interviews with five representatives from European HTA agencies were performed to assess their user experiences with the Core Model.
RESULTS: The comparative study revealed that 50 percent of the total number (n = 144) of AEs in the Core Model were relevant for the national report. Of these 144 AEs from the Core Model, 34 (24 percent) were covered in the national report. Some AEs were covered only partly. The interviewees emphasized flexibility in using the Core Model and stated that the most important aspects to be evaluated include characteristics of the disease and technology, clinical effectiveness, economic aspects, and safety.
CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the national report covered an acceptable number of AEs of the Core Model. These results need to be interpreted with caution because only one comparison was performed. The Core Model can be used in a flexible manner, applying only those elements that are relevant from the perspective of the technology assessment and specific country context.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case reports; National health policy; Qualitative research; Technology assessment; Validation studies

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29157316     DOI: 10.1017/S026646231700099X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  1 in total

1.  Towards compatibility of EUnetHTA JCA methodology and German HTA: a systematic comparison and recommendations from an industry perspective.

Authors:  Agnes Kisser; Joschua Knieriemen; Annette Fasan; Karolin Eberle; Sara Hogger; Sebastian Werner; Tina Taube; Andrej Rasch
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-11-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.