Literature DB >> 29156508

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the readiness for hospital discharge scale/short form.

Sıdıka Kaya1, Gulay Sain Guven2, Mesut Teleş3, Cahit Korku3, Seda Aydan3, Ahmet Kar3, Nazan Kartal3, Gülsüm Şeyma Koca3, Ahmet Yıldız3.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study is to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the readiness for hospital discharge scale/short form.
BACKGROUND: Assessment of readiness for discharge from the patient's perspective is becoming increasingly important for patient safety, satisfaction and various patient outcomes such as readmission, health service utilization and mortality. The readiness for hospital discharge scale/short form allows health care providers to determine patients' discharge readiness.
METHODS: Participants were 1,579 inpatients from internal medicine departments. The readiness for hospital discharge scale/short form was translated into Turkish via back-translation. We analyzed its reliability and validity via item analyses, an expert panel (content validity) and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (construct validity).
RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha of the whole scale was .74 and those for the subscales ranged from .79 to .93. The Spearman-Brown reliability coefficient was .92. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed good fit indices (χ2 /df = 2.6; RMSEA = .03; CFI = 1; GFI and AGFI = .99). The mean total score was 7.27 ± 1.85, while the subscale means ranged from 6.62 ± 3.41 to 7.69 ± 2.24.
CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of the readiness for hospital discharge scale/short form is a valid and reliable tool for assessing discharge readiness. The subscales with low means suggest opportunities for improvement. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: If readiness for hospital discharge scale/short form is valid and reliable, patients who are unready for discharge can be determined with this scale. Thus, nurse managers can determine what kind of measures should be taken for patients who are not ready for discharge, can control nursing practices related to these patients and can provide cooperation between the nurses and other health professionals.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Turkish version; discharge readiness; hospital; readiness for hospital discharge scale; reliability; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29156508     DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Manag        ISSN: 0966-0429            Impact factor:   3.325


  3 in total

1.  Test-retest Reliability for HAQ-DI and SF-36 PF for the Measurement of Physical Function in Psoriatic Arthritis.

Authors:  Ying Ying Leung; William Tillett; Pil Hojgaard; Ana-Maria Orbai; Richard Holland; Ashish J Mathew; Niti Goel; Jeffrey Chau; Christine A Lindsay; Alexis Ogdie; Laura C Coates; Robin Christensen; Philip J Mease; Vibeke Strand; Dafna D Gladman
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 5.346

2.  Psychometric properties and latent profile analysis of the Nursing Brand Image Scale: a methodological study in the Chinese context.

Authors:  Lu Zhou; Zhao Ni; Judi Allyn Godsey; Khunanan Sukpasjaroen; YuMing Wu; Gao Liu; Thitinan Chankoson; Robert Kallmeyer; EnLi Cai
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-09-21

3.  Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load (MDT-CL).

Authors:  Shan Zhang; Ying Wu; Ziyuan Fu; Yating Lu; Qingyu Wang; Liu Mingxuan
Journal:  J Nurs Manag       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.325

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.