Literature DB >> 29156198

The evolving role of genomic testing in assessing prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

David P Steensma1.   

Abstract

The introduction into routine hematology-oncology clinical practice of molecular genetic testing assays based on next-generation sequencing platforms is prompting reassessment of the importance of molecular assay results in comparison to existing disease-specific risk stratification tools based on clinical assessment and light microscopy. For patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), the most commonly used tools for prognostication currently include the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and the Revised IPSS (IPSS-R), which are based on marrow blast proportion, number and degree of cytopenias, and the metaphase karyotype. Integration of DNA sequencing data into an existing evidence-based practice approach inclusive of the IPSS or IPSS-R may be challenging, but the additional information provided by molecular genetic testing clearly can influence clinical decisions, such as determining patients' eligibility for clinical trials of novel targeted agents or helping assess which patients should be referred for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This review discusses the prognostic and predictive value of mutation testing in the context of current clinical care of patients with MDS.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gene mutations; International Prognostic Scoring System; Molecular genetic testing; Myelodysplastic syndromes; Next generation sequencing; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29156198     DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2017.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol        ISSN: 1521-6926            Impact factor:   3.020


  3 in total

1.  Getting personal with myelodysplastic syndromes: is now the right time?

Authors:  Nora Chokr; Alexander B Pine; Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Rory M Shallis; Maximilian Stahl; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 2.929

Review 2.  ICUS, IDUS, CHIP and CCUS: Diagnostic Criteria, Separation from MDS and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Peter Valent
Journal:  Pathobiology       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Case Report: Heterozygous Germline Variant in EIF6 Additional to Biallelic SBDS Pathogenic Variants in a Patient With Ribosomopathy Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome.

Authors:  Ibrahim Taha; Selena Foroni; Roberto Valli; Annalisa Frattini; Pamela Roccia; Giovanni Porta; Marco Zecca; Elena Bergami; Marco Cipolli; Francesco Pasquali; Cesare Danesino; Claudia Scotti; Antonella Minelli
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.772

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.