Patrick B Fink1, Richard A Deyo1,2, Sara E Hallvik3, Christi Hildebran3. 1. Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. 2. Department of Family Medicine, Department of Medicine, and Oregon Institute for Occupational Health, Portland, Oregon. 3. HealthInsight Oregon, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Abstract
Objective: Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) were created to facilitate responsible use of controlled substances. In Oregon, physicians, physician's assistants (MDs/DOs/PAs), dentists, nurse practitioners (NPs), and naturopathic physicians (NDs) may prescribe opioids, but differences in prescribing practices, patient mix, and patient outcomes among prescriber types have not been characterized. Methods: De-identified Oregon PDMP data from October 2011 through October 2014 were linked with vital records and a statewide hospital discharge registry. The disciplines of registered prescribers were identified by board affiliations. Prescription profiles associated with opioid overdose risk were tabulated for patients with at least one registered prescriber. Opioid-related hospitalizations and deaths were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Results: There were 5,935 prescribers registered during the study period. Patients of NPs or NDs received more high-risk opioid prescriptions than patients of MDs/DOs/PAs. For example, they received greater proportions of high-dose prescriptions (NP 12.9%, ND 15%, MD/DO/PA 11.1%), and had greater opioid-related hospitalization (NP 1.7%, ND 3.1%, MD/DO/PA 1.2%; P < 0.005 for all). However, patients of NPs or NDs were also more likely to have four or more prescribers (NP 45.3%, ND 58.5%, MD/DO/PA 27.1%), and most of their patients' high-risk opioid prescriptions came from prescribers in other disciplines. Conclusion: Our analysis suggests significant differences in opioid prescription profiles and opioid-related hospitalization and mortality among patients receiving opioid prescriptions from nurse practitioners, naturopathic physicians, or medical clinicians in Oregon. However, these differences appear largely due to differences in patient mix between provider types rather than discipline-specific prescribing practices.
Objective: Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) were created to facilitate responsible use of controlled substances. In Oregon, physicians, physician's assistants (MDs/DOs/PAs), dentists, nurse practitioners (NPs), and naturopathic physicians (NDs) may prescribe opioids, but differences in prescribing practices, patient mix, and patient outcomes among prescriber types have not been characterized. Methods: De-identified Oregon PDMP data from October 2011 through October 2014 were linked with vital records and a statewide hospital discharge registry. The disciplines of registered prescribers were identified by board affiliations. Prescription profiles associated with opioid overdose risk were tabulated for patients with at least one registered prescriber. Opioid-related hospitalizations and deaths were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Results: There were 5,935 prescribers registered during the study period. Patients of NPs or NDs received more high-risk opioid prescriptions than patients of MDs/DOs/PAs. For example, they received greater proportions of high-dose prescriptions (NP 12.9%, ND 15%, MD/DO/PA 11.1%), and had greater opioid-related hospitalization (NP 1.7%, ND 3.1%, MD/DO/PA 1.2%; P < 0.005 for all). However, patients of NPs or NDs were also more likely to have four or more prescribers (NP 45.3%, ND 58.5%, MD/DO/PA 27.1%), and most of their patients' high-risk opioid prescriptions came from prescribers in other disciplines. Conclusion: Our analysis suggests significant differences in opioid prescription profiles and opioid-related hospitalization and mortality among patients receiving opioid prescriptions from nurse practitioners, naturopathic physicians, or medical clinicians in Oregon. However, these differences appear largely due to differences in patient mix between provider types rather than discipline-specific prescribing practices.
Authors: Richard A Deyo; Sara E Hallvik; Christi Hildebran; Miguel Marino; Eve Dexter; Jessica M Irvine; Nicole O'Kane; Joshua Van Otterloo; Dagan A Wright; Gillian Leichtling; Lisa M Millet Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Leonard J Paulozzi; Edwin M Kilbourne; Nina G Shah; Kurt B Nolte; Hema A Desai; Michael G Landen; William Harvey; Larry D Loring Journal: Pain Med Date: 2011-10-25 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Jane A Gwira Baumblatt; Caleb Wiedeman; John R Dunn; William Schaffner; Leonard J Paulozzi; Timothy F Jones Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Debora C Matthews; Martha G S Brillant; Kudirat O Jimoh; Winston Singleton; Pamela McLean-Veysey; Ingrid Sketris Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2019-08-06
Authors: Patrick Richard; Mark R Bauer; Natalie Moresco; Regine Walker; Diana Bowser; Demarcio Reed; Mary Jo Larson Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2020-12-24 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Sanae El Ibrahimi; Sara Hallvik; Kirbee Johnston; Gillian Leichtling; Esther Choo; Daniel M Hartung Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2020-08-10 Impact factor: 2.732