Literature DB >> 29155982

Economic and survival burden of dysphagia among inpatients in the United States.

D A Patel1, S Krishnaswami2, E Steger3, E Conover3, M F Vaezi1, M R Ciucci4,5, D O Francis6,5.   

Abstract

The inpatient burden of dysphagia has primarily been evaluated in patients with stroke. It is unclear whether dysphagia, irrespective of cause, is associated with worse clinical outcomes and higher costs compared to inpatients with similar demographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics without dysphagia. The aim of this study is to assess how a dysphagia diagnosis affects length of hospital stay (LOS), costs, discharge disposition, and in-hospital mortality among adult US inpatients. Annual and overall dysphagia prevalence, LOS, hospital charges, inpatient care costs, discharge disposition, and in-hospital mortality were measured using the AHRQ Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (2009-2013). Patients aged 45 years or older with ≤180 days of stay in hospital with and without dysphagia were included. Multivariable survey regression methods with propensity weighting were used to assess associations between dysphagia and different outcomes. Overall, 2.7 of 88 million (3.0%) adult US inpatients had a dysphagia diagnosis (50.2% male, 72.4% white, 74.6% age 65-90 years) and prevalence increased from 408,035 (2.5% of admissions) in 2009 to 656,655 (3.3%) in 2013. After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment, mean hospital LOS in patients with dysphagia was 8.8 days (95% CI 8.66-8.90) compared to 5.0 days (95% CI 4.97-5.05) in the non-dysphagia group (P < 0.001). Total inpatient costs were a mean $6,243 higher among those with dysphagia diagnoses ($19,244 vs. 13,001, P < 0.001). Patients with dysphagia were 33.2% more likely to be transferred to post-acute care facility (71.9% vs. 38.7%, P < 0.001) with an adjusted OR of 2.8 (95% CI 2.73-2.81, P < 0.001). Compared to non-cases, adult patients with dysphagia were 1.7 times more likely to die in the hospital (95% CI 1.67-1.74). Dysphagia affects 3.0% of all adult US inpatients (aged 45-90 years) and is associated with a significantly longer hospital length of stay, higher inpatient costs, a higher likelihood of discharge to post-acute care facility, and inpatient mortality when compared to those with similar patient, hospital size, and clinical characteristics without dysphagia. Dysphagia has a substantial health and cost burden on the US healthcare system.
© The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  costs; dysphagia; hospitalization; inpatient; mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29155982      PMCID: PMC6454833          DOI: 10.1093/dote/dox131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  31 in total

1.  Dysphagia prevalence and associated survival differences in older patients with lung cancer: A SEER-Medicare population-based study.

Authors:  Schelomo Marmor; Seth Cohen; Naomi Fujioka; L Chinsoo Cho; Amit Bhargava; Stephanie Misono
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 2.  "Hidden in Plain Sight": A Descriptive Review of Laryngeal Vestibule Closure.

Authors:  Alicia Vose; Ianessa Humbert
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Association Between Dysphagia and Inpatient Outcomes Across Frailty Level Among Patients ≥ 50 Years of Age.

Authors:  Seth M Cohen; Deborah Lekan; Thomas Risoli; Hui-Jie Lee; Stephanie Misono; Heather E Whitson; Sudha Raman
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Factors Associated with Self-Reported Dysphagia in Older Adults Receiving Meal Support.

Authors:  A Kurosu; F Osman; S Daggett; R Peña-Chávez; A Thompson; S M Myers; P VanKampen; S S Koenig; M Ciucci; J Mahoney; N Rogus-Pulia
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  Differences in upper esophageal sphincter function and clinical characteristics among the three subtypes of Japanese patients with esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Ryo Katsumata; Noriaki Manabe; Maki Ayaki; Minoru Fujita; Jun Nakamura; Hirofumi Kawamoto; Yuusaku Sugihara; Hiroyuki Sakae; Kenta Hamada; Ken Haruma
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 4.230

6.  Incidence and Risk Factors for Dysphagia Following Non-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Katrina Dunn; Anna Rumbach
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Evaluating the Feasibility and Validity of Using Trained Allied Health Assistants to Assist in Mealtime Monitoring of Dysphagic Patients.

Authors:  Maria Schwarz; Elizabeth C Ward; Petrea Cornwell; Anne Coccetti; Naomi Kalapac
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Shifting Tides Toward a Proactive Patient-Centered Approach in Dysphagia Management of Neurodegenerative Disease.

Authors:  Nicole M Rogus-Pulia; Emily K Plowman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 9.  Rheological Issues on Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.

Authors:  Crispulo Gallegos; Mihaela Turcanu; Getachew Assegehegn; Edmundo Brito-de la Fuente
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  Scoring the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) in Two Conditions: A Reliability Study.

Authors:  Munirah Alkhuwaiter; Kate Davidson; Theresa Hopkins-Rossabi; Bonnie Martin-Harris
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.