| Literature DB >> 29155762 |
Ilse Eidhof1, Michaela Fenckova1, Dei M Elurbe2, Bart van de Warrenburg3, Anna Castells Nobau4, Annette Schenck5.
Abstract
Advances in next-generation sequencing technologies contribute to the identification of (candidate) disease genes for movement disorders and other neurological diseases at an increasing speed. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms that underlie these disorders. The genetic, molecular, and behavioral toolbox of Drosophila melanogaster makes this model organism particularly useful to characterize new disease genes and mechanisms in a high-throughput manner. Nevertheless, high-throughput screens require efficient and reliable assays that, ideally, are cost-effective and allow for the automatized quantification of traits relevant to these disorders. The island assay is a cost-effective and easily set-up method to evaluate Drosophila locomotor behavior. In this assay, flies are thrown onto a platform from a fixed height. This induces an innate motor response that enables the flies to escape from the platform within seconds. At present, quantitative analyses of filmed island assays are done manually, which is a laborious undertaking, particularly when performing large screens. This manuscript describes the "Drosophila Island Assay" and "Island Assay Analysis" algorithms for high-throughput, automated data processing and quantification of island assay data. In the setup, a simple webcam connected to a laptop collects an image series of the platform while the assay is performed. The "Drosophila Island Assay" algorithm developed for the open-source software Fiji processes these image series and quantifies, for each experimental condition, the number of flies on the platform over time. The "Island Assay Analysis" script, compatible with the free software R, was developed to automatically process the obtained data and to calculate whether treatments/genotypes are statistically different. This greatly improves the efficiency of the island assay and makes it a powerful readout for basic locomotion and flight behavior. It can thus be applied to large screens investigating fly locomotor ability, Drosophila models of movement disorders, and drug efficacy.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29155762 PMCID: PMC5755321 DOI: 10.3791/55892
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vis Exp ISSN: 1940-087X Impact factor: 1.355




|
|
|
|
| Frame name. |
|
| The number of objects detected in the frame within the limits of the platform (ROI). |
|
| Total area of the objects detected in the frame within the limits of the platform (ROI) in pixels. |
|
| Total area of the objects detected in the frame divided by the number of objects within the limits of the platform (ROI). |
|
| The percentage of area occupied by the objects with respect to the total area of the platform (ROI). |
|
| Total perimeter of the objects detected in the frame within the limits of the platform (ROI) in pixels. |
|
| The minimum fly size setting defined by the user in the graphical interface of the " |
|
| The area of the platform (ROI) defined by the user during the run of the sub-macro define platform (in pixels). |
|
| The number of flies used per experiment defined by the user in the graphical interface of the " |
|
|
|
|
| Frame number. |
|
| The number of flies detected in the frame within the limits of the platform (ROI). |
|
| Total area of the flies detected in the frame within the limits of the platform (ROI) in pixels. |
|
| The minimum fly size entry setting defined by the user in the graphical interface of the " |
|
| The area of the platform (ROI, in pixels) defined by the user when running the sub-macro "define platform". |
|
| The number of flies used per experiment defined by the user in the graphical interface of the " |
|
| % flies present on the platform in the respective slice/frame relative to the highest number of flies detected on the platform during experiment. |
|
| Time point 1 represents the first frame to be analysed and corresponds to the frame where the flies first appear on the platform. There are a total of 100 frames per replicate analyzed (corresponding to 10 s, when using the described settings. |
|
| Number of replicates per condition. |
|
| Indicates the name of the experimental condition (according to the user-defined name of the folder containing the data). |