Literature DB >> 29155344

Freehand technique for C2 pedicle and pars screw placement: is it safe?

Prachya Punyarat1, Jacob M Buchowski2, Benjamin T Klawson3, Colleen Peters3, Thamrong Lertudomphonwanit4, K Daniel Riew5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: During placement of C2 pedicle and pars screws, intraoperative fluoroscopy is used so that neurovascular complications can be avoided, and screws can be placed in the proper position. However, this method is time consuming and increases radiation exposure. Furthermore, it does not guarantee a completely safe and accurate screw placement.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of the C2 pedicle and pars screw placement without fluoroscopic or other guidance methods. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective comparative study. PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred ninety-eight patients who underwent placement of C2 pedicle or pars screws without any intraoperative radiographic guidance were included in the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical records and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data were reviewed for intraoperative and postoperative complications. The accuracy of screw placement was evaluated with postop CT scans using a previously published cortical-breach grading system (described by the location and the percentage of the screw diameter over the cortical edge [0=none, Grade I≤25% of the screw diameter, Grade II=26%-50%, Grade III=51%-75%, and Grade IV=76%-100%]).
RESULTS: A total of 148 pedicle screws and 219 pars screws were inserted by two experienced surgeons. There were no cases of cerebral spinal fluid leakage and no neurovascular complications during screw placement. Postoperative CT scans were available for 76 patients, which included 52 pedicle screws and 87 pars screws. For cases with C2 pedicle screws, there were 12 breaches (23%); these included 10 screws with a Grade I breach (19%), 1 screw with a Grade II breach (2%), and 1 screw with a Grade IV breach (2%). Lateral breaches occurred in seven screws (13%), inferior breaches occurred in three screws (6%), and superior breaches occurred in two screws (4%). For cases with C2 pars screws, there were 10 breaches (11%); these included 6 screws with a Grade I breach (7%), 2 screws with a Grade II breach (2%), and 2 screws with a Grade IV breach (2%). Medial breaches were found in four (5%), lateral breaches in two (2%), inferior breaches in two (2%), and superior breaches in two (2%). Two of the cases with superior breaches (one for pedicle and one for pars) experienced occipital neuralgia months after surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of overall and high-grade breaches between the groups (p=.07 and 1.0, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Although even in experienced hands up to 23% of C2 pedicle screws and 11% of C2 pars screws placed using a freehand technique without guidance may be malpositioned, a clear majority of malpositioned screws demonstrated a low-grade breach, and only 2 of 198 patients (1%) experienced complications related to screw placement.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axial cervical spine; C2 pars screw; C2 pedicle screw; Complications; Fixation; Freehand technique; Instrumentation; Pars screw; Pedicle screw

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29155344     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  9 in total

1.  Can C1 lateral mass and C3 pedicle screw fixation be used as an option for atlantoaxial reduction and stabilization in Klippel-Feil patients? A study of its morphological feasibility, technical nuances, and clinical efficiency.

Authors:  Yue-Qi Du; Yi-Heng Yin; Teng Li; Guang-Yu Qiao; Xin-Guang Yu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Robot-assisted atlantoaxial fixation: illustrative cases.

Authors:  Amanda N Sacino; Joshua Materi; A Daniel Davidar; Brendan Judy; Ann Liu; Brian Hwang; Nicholas Theodore
Journal:  J Neurosurg Case Lessons       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  The medial window technique as a salvage method to insert C2 pedicle screw in the case of a high-riding vertebral artery or narrow pedicle: a technical note and case series.

Authors:  Dong-Ho Lee; Sehan Park; Jae Hwan Cho; Chang Ju Hwang; Hyung Rae Lee; Sang Yun Seok; Choon Sung Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 2.721

4.  A novel screw view model of 3D navigation for upper cervical pedicle screw placement: A case report.

Authors:  Jianwu Zhao; Lili Yang; Shuang Zheng; Yang Qu; Xiwen Zhang; Mingyang Kang; Rongpeng Dong; Xin Zhao; Tong Yu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Accuracy evaluation of placements of three different alternative C2 screws using the freehand technique in patients with high riding vertebral artery.

Authors:  Jong-Hyeok Park; Jong Beom Lee; Ho Jin Lee; Il Sup Kim; Jae Taek Hong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Accuracy and safety of C2 pedicle or pars screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Parisa Azimi; Taravat Yazdanian; Edward C Benzel; Hossein Nayeb Aghaei; Shirzad Azhari; Sohrab Sadeghi; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Occipitocervical Fusion via Cervical Pedicle Fixation Assisted with O-arm Navigation.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Wang; Zhang-Zhe Zhou; Bin Wang; Kai Zhang; Hao Chen; Kang-Wu Chen; Hai-Qing Mao
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.071

8.  A Comparative Study of C2 Pedicle or Pars Screw Placement with Assistance from a 3-Dimensional (3D)-Printed Navigation Template versus C-Arm Based Navigation.

Authors:  Ye Tian; Jianan Zhang; Tuanjiang Liu; Shi Tang; Hao Chen; Keyuan Ding; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-12-26

9.  Combined 3-dimensional printing model and 3-dimensional fluoroscopic navigation to assist C2 pedicle screw insertion: A case report.

Authors:  Hao-Tian Xu; Shuang Zheng; Rong-Peng Dong; Tong Yu; Jian-Wu Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.