Literature DB >> 2915523

Word recognition functions for the CID W-22 test in multitalker noise for normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

R C Beattie1.   

Abstract

Word recognition functions for Auditec recordings of the CID W-22 stimuli in multitalker noise were obtained using subjects with normal hearing and with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss. In the first experiment, word recognition functions were generated by varying the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N); whereas in the second experiment, a constant S/N was used and stimulus intensity was varied. The split-half reliability of word recognition scores for the normal-hearing and hearing-impaired groups revealed variability that agreed closely with predictions based on the simple binomial distribution. Therefore, the binomial model appears appropriate for estimating the variability of word recognition scores whether they are obtained in quiet or in a competing background noise. The reliability for threshold (50% point) revealed good stability. The slope of the recognition function was steeper for normal listeners than for the hearing-impaired subjects. Word recognition testing in noise can provide insight into the problems imposed by hearing loss, particularly when evaluating patients with mild hearing loss who exhibit no difficulties with conventional tests. Clinicians should employ a sufficient number of stimuli so that the test is adequately sensitive to differences among listening conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2915523     DOI: 10.1044/jshd.5401.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord        ISSN: 0022-4677


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of TIMIT sentence list equivalency with adult cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Sarah E King; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Laura K Holden; Michael Strube
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  Unilateral and mild bilateral hearing loss in children: past and current perspectives.

Authors:  Anne Marie Tharpe
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-03

3.  Effect of face masks on speech understanding: A clinical perspective during speech audiometry.

Authors:  Rawish Kumar; Sanjay Kumar Munjal; Anuradha Sharma; Md Noorain Alam; Naresh K Panda
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2022-04-29

Review 4.  Variations in the slope of the psychometric functions for speech intelligibility: a systematic survey.

Authors:  Alexandra MacPherson; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature.

Authors:  Andrea L Pittman; Elizabeth C Stewart; Amanda P Willman; Ian S Odgear
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  On the Difference of Scoring in Speech in Babble Tests.

Authors:  Afroditi Sereti; Christos Sidiras; Nikos Eleftheriadis; Ioannis Nimatoudis; Gail D Chermak; Vasiliki Maria Iliadou
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28

7.  Speech recognition in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Adriana Neves de Andrade; Maria Cecilia Martinelli Iorio; Daniela Gil
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.