Evangelos Drosos1, Dimitrios Giakoumettis1, Alexandros Blionas2, Andreas Mitsios3, Georgios Sfakianos4, Marios Themistocleous5. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, General Hospital "Asklipieio Voulas", Athens, Greece. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece; Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital "Aghia Sophia", Athens, Greece. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital "Aghia Sophia", Athens, Greece. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital "Aghia Sophia", Athens, Greece. Electronic address: mthemistocleous@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pediatric nonmissile penetrating head injury (NMPHI) is usually accidental attributed mainly to the softer skulls of growing children. However, it is a rare entity, and therefore no consensus exists regarding treatment to effectively prevent immediate and long-term complications. Throughout the literature, these injuries are mostly discussed in case reviews and case series in the general population. No data originating from randomized studies are available because of ethical and practical limitations. METHODS: We retrospectively studied and present 5 cases of children with NMPHI treated in the last 6 years in the Neurosurgery Department of Children's Hospital "Aghia Sofia". We performed a review of the literature in PubMed, using the key words "non-missile," "penetrating head injury," and "pediatric." We included case reports and case series involving pediatric cases since 2008 and selected older reports as well as certain literature reviews focusing on analysis of complications and treatment suggestions. We compared reported practice in various institutions with suggestions from the literature. RESULTS: In the last year, 4 literature reviews were published suggesting treatment algorithms of NMPHIs. Surgery timing and method as well as anticonvulsant and antibiotic therapy still remain debatable. The only review concentrating on pediatric populations dates back to 1994, based on patient outcome studies from the 1980s. In our review, treatment steps were similar among various institutions and resembled recently suggested algorithms, with better treatment outcomes than originally reported 30 years ago.
BACKGROUND: Pediatric nonmissile penetrating head injury (NMPHI) is usually accidental attributed mainly to the softer skulls of growing children. However, it is a rare entity, and therefore no consensus exists regarding treatment to effectively prevent immediate and long-term complications. Throughout the literature, these injuries are mostly discussed in case reviews and case series in the general population. No data originating from randomized studies are available because of ethical and practical limitations. METHODS: We retrospectively studied and present 5 cases of children with NMPHI treated in the last 6 years in the Neurosurgery Department of Children's Hospital "Aghia Sofia". We performed a review of the literature in PubMed, using the key words "non-missile," "penetrating head injury," and "pediatric." We included case reports and case series involving pediatric cases since 2008 and selected older reports as well as certain literature reviews focusing on analysis of complications and treatment suggestions. We compared reported practice in various institutions with suggestions from the literature. RESULTS: In the last year, 4 literature reviews were published suggesting treatment algorithms of NMPHIs. Surgery timing and method as well as anticonvulsant and antibiotic therapy still remain debatable. The only review concentrating on pediatric populations dates back to 1994, based on patient outcome studies from the 1980s. In our review, treatment steps were similar among various institutions and resembled recently suggested algorithms, with better treatment outcomes than originally reported 30 years ago.