Literature DB >> 29155009

Thresholds for sine-wave corrugations defined by binocular disparity in random dot stereograms: Factor analysis of individual differences reveals two stereoscopic mechanisms tuned for spatial frequency.

David H Peterzell1, Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza2, Michael Widdall3, Jenny C A Read3.   

Abstract

Threshold functions for sinusoidal depth corrugations typically reach their minimum (highest sensitivity) at spatial frequencies of 0.2-0.4 cycles/degree (cpd), with lower thresholds for horizontal than vertical corrugations at low spatial frequencies. To elucidate spatial frequency and orientation tuning of stereoscopic mechanisms, we measured the disparity sensitivity functions, and used factor analytic techniques to estimate the existence of independent underlying stereo channels. The data set (N = 30 individuals) was for horizontal and vertical corrugations of spatial frequencies ranging from 0.1 to 1.6 cpd. A principal component analysis of disparity sensitivities (log-arcsec) revealed that two significant factors accounted for 70% of the variability. Following Varimax rotation to approximate "simple structure", one factor clearly loaded onto low spatial frequencies (≤0.4 cpd), and a second was tuned to higher spatial frequencies (≥0.8 cpd). Each factor had nearly identical tuning (loadings) for horizontal and vertical patterns. The finding of separate factors for low and high spatial frequencies is consistent with previous studies. The failure to find separate factors for horizontal and vertical corrugations is somewhat surprising because the neuronal mechanisms are believed to be different. Following an oblique rotation (Direct Oblimin), the two factors correlated significantly, suggesting some interdependence rather than full independence between the two factors.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binocular disparity; Factor analysis; Individual differences; Psychophysics; Random dot stereograms; Spatial frequency; Spatial frequency channels; Stereo anisotropy; Stereogratings; Stereopsis; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29155009     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Optics and neural adaptation jointly limit human stereovision.

Authors:  Cherlyn J Ng; Randolph Blake; Martin S Banks; Duje Tadin; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Dynamics of absolute and relative disparity processing in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Milena Kaestner; Marissa L Evans; Yulan D Chen; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 7.400

3.  Individual differences in the perception of visual illusions are stable across eyes, time, and measurement methods.

Authors:  Aline F Cretenoud; Lukasz Grzeczkowski; Marina Kunchulia; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Assessment of depth perception with a comprehensive disparity defined letter test: A pilot study.

Authors:  Wei Hau Lew; Daniel R Coates
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  When illusions merge.

Authors:  Aline F Cretenoud; Gregory Francis; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.