Joost M Meijer1, Ingeborg Atefi2, Gilles F H Diercks1, Artem Vorobyev2, Janny Zuiderveen1, Hillegonda J Meijer1, Hendri H Pas1, Detlef Zillikens2, Enno Schmidt3, Marcel F Jonkman4. 1. Department of Dermatology, Center for Blistering Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. 3. Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. 4. Department of Dermatology, Center for Blistering Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.f.jonkman@umcg.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) microscopy of a skin biopsy specimen is the reference standard for the diagnosis of pemphigoid diseases (PDs). Serration pattern analysis enables the differentiation of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) from other PDs using DIF microscopy alone. However, practice gaps need to be addressed in order to implement this technique in the routine diagnostic procedure. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine and optimize the technical requirements for serration pattern analysis of DIF microscopy and determine interrater conformity of serration pattern analysis. METHODS: We compared serration pattern analysis of routine DIF microscopy from laboratories in Groningen, The Netherlands and Lübeck, Germany with 4 blinded observers. Skin biopsy specimens from 20 patients with EBA and other PDs were exchanged and analyzed. Various factors were evaluated, including section thickness, transport medium, and biopsy specimen processing. RESULTS: The interrater conformity of our 4 observers was 95.7%. Recognition of serration patterns was comparable in samples transported in saline and in Michel's medium and with section thicknesses of 4, 6, and 8 μm. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include our small sample size and the availability of 20 samples that were compared retrospectively. CONCLUSION: DIF serration pattern analysis is not restricted by variation in laboratory procedures, transport medium, or experience of observers. This learnable technique can be implemented as a routine diagnostic method as an extension of DIF microscopy for subtyping PD.
BACKGROUND: Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) microscopy of a skin biopsy specimen is the reference standard for the diagnosis of pemphigoid diseases (PDs). Serration pattern analysis enables the differentiation of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) from other PDs using DIF microscopy alone. However, practice gaps need to be addressed in order to implement this technique in the routine diagnostic procedure. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine and optimize the technical requirements for serration pattern analysis of DIF microscopy and determine interrater conformity of serration pattern analysis. METHODS: We compared serration pattern analysis of routine DIF microscopy from laboratories in Groningen, The Netherlands and Lübeck, Germany with 4 blinded observers. Skin biopsy specimens from 20 patients with EBA and other PDs were exchanged and analyzed. Various factors were evaluated, including section thickness, transport medium, and biopsy specimen processing. RESULTS: The interrater conformity of our 4 observers was 95.7%. Recognition of serration patterns was comparable in samples transported in saline and in Michel's medium and with section thicknesses of 4, 6, and 8 μm. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include our small sample size and the availability of 20 samples that were compared retrospectively. CONCLUSION: DIF serration pattern analysis is not restricted by variation in laboratory procedures, transport medium, or experience of observers. This learnable technique can be implemented as a routine diagnostic method as an extension of DIF microscopy for subtyping PD.
Authors: Joost M Meijer; Gilles F H Diercks; Emma W G de Lang; Hendri H Pas; Marcel F Jonkman Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Hideyuki Ujiie; David Rosmarin; Michael P Schön; Sonja Ständer; Katharina Boch; Martin Metz; Marcus Maurer; Diamant Thaci; Enno Schmidt; Connor Cole; Kyle T Amber; Dario Didona; Michael Hertl; Andreas Recke; Hanna Graßhoff; Alexander Hackel; Anja Schumann; Gabriela Riemekasten; Katja Bieber; Gant Sprow; Joshua Dan; Detlef Zillikens; Tanya Sezin; Angela M Christiano; Kerstin Wolk; Robert Sabat; Khalaf Kridin; Victoria P Werth; Ralf J Ludwig Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-06-09
Authors: Sandra Saschenbrecker; Ingolf Karl; Lars Komorowski; Christian Probst; Cornelia Dähnrich; Kai Fechner; Winfried Stöcker; Wolfgang Schlumberger Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Hanan Rashid; Aniek Lamberts; Gilles F H Diercks; Hendri H Pas; Joost M Meijer; Maria C Bolling; Barbara Horváth Journal: Am J Clin Dermatol Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 7.403