Literature DB >> 29154967

Bone marrow mechanotransduction in porcine explants alters kinase activation and enhances trabecular bone formation in the absence of osteocyte signaling.

Kimberly J Curtis1, Thomas R Coughlin1, Devon E Mason2, Joel D Boerckel2, Glen L Niebur3.   

Abstract

Bone is a dynamic tissue that can adapt its architecture in response to mechanical signals under the control of osteocytes, which sense mechanical deformation of the mineralized bone. However, cells in the marrow are also mechanosensitive and may contribute to load-induced bone adaptation, as marrow is subjected to mechanical stress during bone deformation. We investigated the contribution of mechanotransduction in marrow cells to trabecular bone formation by applying low magnitude mechanical stimulation (LMMS) to porcine vertebral trabecular bone explants in an in situ bioreactor. The bone formation rate was higher in stimulated explants compared to unloaded controls which represent a disuse condition (CNT). However, sclerostin protein expression in osteocytes was not different between groups, nor was expression of osteocytic mechanoregulatory genes SOST, IGF-1, CTGF, and Cyr61, suggesting the mechanoregulatory program of osteocytes was unaffected by the loading regime. In contrast, c-Fos, a gene indicative of mechanical stimulation, was upregulated in the marrow cells of mechanically stimulated explants, while the level of activated c-Jun decreased by 25%. The activator protein 1 (AP-1) transcription factor is a heterodimer of c-Fos and c-Jun, which led us to investigate the expression of the downstream target gene cyclin-D1, a gene associated with cell cycle progression and osteogenesis. Cyclin-D1 gene expression in the stimulated marrow was approximately double that of the controls. The level of phosphorylated PYK2, a purported inhibitor of osteoblast differentiation, also decreased in marrow cells from stimulated explants. Taken together, mechanotransduction in marrow cells induced trabecular bone formation independent of osteocyte signaling. Identifying the specific cells and signaling pathways involved, and verifying them with inhibition of specific signaling molecules, could lead to potential therapeutic targets for diseases characterized by bone loss.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone adaptation; Bone marrow; Dynamic histomorphometry; Mechanobiology; Osteocytes; Trabecular bone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29154967     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  9 in total

Review 1.  Gone Caving: Roles of the Transcriptional Regulators YAP and TAZ in Skeletal Development.

Authors:  Christopher D Kegelman; Joseph M Collins; Madhura P Nijsure; Emily A Eastburn; Joel D Boerckel
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Mechanoregulation in hematopoiesis and hematologic disorders.

Authors:  Paulina D Horton; Sandeep Dumbali; Pamela L Wenzel
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Rep       Date:  2020-05-21

3.  Perlecan/Hspg2 deficiency impairs bone's calcium signaling and associated transcriptome in response to mechanical loading.

Authors:  Shaopeng Pei; Sucharitha Parthasarathy; Ashutosh Parajuli; Jerahme Martinez; Mengxi Lv; Sida Jiang; Danielle Wu; Shuo Wei; X Lucas Lu; Mary C Farach-Carson; Catherine B Kirn-Safran; Liyun Wang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Shear Stress in Bone Marrow has a Dose Dependent Effect on cFos Gene Expression in In Situ Culture.

Authors:  Kimberly J Curtis; Thomas R Coughlin; Mary A Varsanik; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.321

Review 5.  Ex vivo Bone Models and Their Potential in Preclinical Evaluation.

Authors:  E E A Cramer; K Ito; S Hofmann
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Organoid-on-a-chip model of human ARPKD reveals mechanosensing pathomechanisms for drug discovery.

Authors:  Ken Hiratsuka; Tomoya Miyoshi; Katharina T Kroll; Navin R Gupta; M Todd Valerius; Thomas Ferrante; Michifumi Yamashita; Jennifer A Lewis; Ryuji Morizane
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 14.957

Review 7.  Integration of clinical perspective into biomimetic bioreactor design for orthopedics.

Authors:  Victoria Drapal; Jordan M Gamble; Jennifer L Robinson; Candan Tamerler; Paul M Arnold; Elizabeth A Friis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  The effect of marrow secretome and culture environment on the rate of metastatic breast cancer cell migration in two and three dimensions.

Authors:  Kimberly J Curtis; Christine Mai; Hannah Martin; Alyssa G Oberman; Laura Alderfer; Ricardo Romero-Moreno; Mark Walsh; Stephen F Mitros; Scott G Thomas; Joseph A Dynako; David I Zimmer; Laoise M McNamara; Laurie E Littlepage; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Physiological cyclic hydrostatic pressure induces osteogenic lineage commitment of human bone marrow stem cells: a systematic study.

Authors:  Elena Stavenschi; Michele A Corrigan; Gillian P Johnson; Mathieu Riffault; David A Hoey
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.832

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.