Literature DB >> 29154649

The limits of visual working memory in children: Exploring prioritization and recency effects with sequential presentation.

Ed D J Berry1, Amanda H Waterman1, Alan D Baddeley2, Graham J Hitch2, Richard J Allen1.   

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that, when instructed to prioritize a serial position in visual working memory (WM), adults are able to boost performance for this selected item, at a cost to nonprioritized items (e.g., Hu, Hitch, Baddeley, Zhang, & Allen, 2014). While executive control appears to play an important role in this ability, the increased likelihood of recalling the most recently presented item (i.e., the recency effect) is relatively automatic, possibly driven by perceptual mechanisms. In 3 Experiments 7 to 10 year-old's ability to prioritize items in WM was investigated using a sequential visual task (total N = 208). The relationship between individual differences in WM and performance on the experimental task was also explored. Participants were unable to prioritize the first (Experiments 1 and 2) or final (Experiment 3) item in a 3-item sequence, while large recency effects for the final item were consistently observed across all experiments. The absence of a priority boost across 3 experiments indicates that children may not have the necessary executive resources to prioritize an item within a visual sequence, when directed to do so. In contrast, the consistent recency boosts for the final item indicate that children show automatic memory benefits for the most recently encountered stimulus. Finally, for the baseline condition in which children were instructed to remember all 3 items equally, additional WM measures predicted performance at the first and second but not the third serial position, further supporting the proposed automaticity of the recency effect in visual WM. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29154649     DOI: 10.1037/dev0000427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  9 in total

1.  Forward and backward recall of serial actions: Exploring the temporal dynamics of working memory for instruction.

Authors:  Tian-Xiao Yang; Lu-Xia Jia; Qi Zheng; Richard J Allen; Zheng Ye
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-02

2.  Gain-Loss Framing Enhances Mnemonic Discrimination in Preschoolers.

Authors:  Chi T Ngo; Nora S Newcombe; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2019-08-07

3.  Attention and binding in visual working memory: Two forms of attention and two kinds of buffer storage.

Authors:  Graham J Hitch; Richard J Allen; Alan D Baddeley
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The association between socioeconomic disadvantage and children's working memory abilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kate E Mooney; Stephanie L Prady; Mary M Barker; Kate E Pickett; Amanda H Waterman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Systematic Review of the Longitudinal Sensitivity of Precision Tasks in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  James Ades; Jyoti Mishra
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21

6.  Socioeconomic disadvantage and ethnicity are associated with large differences in children's working memory ability: analysis of a prospective birth cohort study following 13,500 children.

Authors:  Kate E Mooney; Kate E Pickett; Katy Shire; Richard J Allen; Amanda H Waterman
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-03-15

7.  Working Memory Capacity of Biological Motion's Basic Unit: Decomposing Biological Motion From the Perspective of Systematic Anatomy.

Authors:  Chaoxian Wang; Yue Zhou; Congchong Li; Wenqing Tian; Yang He; Peng Fang; Yijun Li; Huiling Yuan; Xiuxiu Li; Bin Li; Xuelin Luo; Yun Zhang; Xufeng Liu; Shengjun Wu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-22

8.  Task difficulty rather than reward method modulates the reward boosts in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weixi Zheng; Jiayang Geng; Dexiang Zhang; Jie Zhang; Jingpeng Qiao
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

9.  Are there multiple ways to direct attention in working memory?

Authors:  Amy L Atkinson; Ed D J Berry; Amanda H Waterman; Alan D Baddeley; Graham J Hitch; Richard J Allen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.691

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.