Literature DB >> 29154616

Do we see it or not? Sensory attenuation in the visual domain.

Katharina A Schwarz1, Roland Pfister1, Michel Kluge1, Lisa Weller1, Wilfried Kunde1.   

Abstract

Sensory consequences of an agent's actions are perceived less intensely than sensory stimuli that are not caused (and thus not predicted) by the observer. This effect of sensory attenuation has been discussed as a key principle of perception, potentially mediating various crucial functions such as agency and the discrimination of self-caused sensory stimulation from stimuli caused by external factors. Precise models describe the theoretical underpinnings of this phenomenon across a variety of modalities, especially the auditory, tactile, and visual domain. Despite these strong claims, empirical evidence for sensory attenuation in the visual domain is surprisingly sparse and ambiguous. In the present article, the authors therefore aim to clarify the role of sensory attenuation for learned visual action effects. To this end, the authors present a comprehensive replication effort including 3 separate, high-powered experiments on sensory attenuation in the visual domain with 1 direct and 2 preregistered, conceptual replication attempts of an influential study on this topic (Cardoso-Leite et al., 2010). Signal detection analyses were targeted to distinguish between true visual sensitivity and response bias. Contrary to previous assumptions and despite high statistical power, however, the authors found no evidence for sensory attenuation of learned visual action effects. Bayesian analyses further supported the null hypothesis of no effect, thus constraining theories that promote sensory attenuation as an immediate and necessary consequence of voluntary actions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29154616     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  4 in total

Review 1.  The implicit sense of agency is not a perceptual effect but is a judgment effect.

Authors:  Nagireddy Neelakanteswar Reddy
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-11-09

2.  Tactile suppression stems from specific sensorimotor predictions.

Authors:  Elena Fuehrer; Dimitris Voudouris; Alexandra Lezkan; Knut Drewing; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Modified sensory feedback enhances the sense of agency during continuous body movements in virtual reality.

Authors:  Kei Aoyagi; Wen Wen; Qi An; Shunsuke Hamasaki; Hiroshi Yamakawa; Yusuke Tamura; Atsushi Yamashita; Hajime Asama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Sensorimotor predictions shape reported conscious visual experience in a breaking continuous flash suppression task.

Authors:  Lina I Skora; Anil K Seth; Ryan B Scott
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2021-03-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.