Literature DB >> 29154522

Distribution and Evaluation of a Carbon Monoxide Detector Intervention in Two Settings: Emergency Department and Urban Community.

Lara B McKenzie, Kristin J Roberts, Wendy C Shields, Eileen McDonald, Elise Omaki, Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul, Andrea C Gielen.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe changes in carbon monoxide (CO) safety knowledge and observed CO detector use following distribution of a CO detector use intervention in two environments, a pediatric emergency department (Ohio) and an urban community (Maryland). A total of 301 participants completed the 6-month follow up (Ohio: n = 125; Maryland: n = 176). The majority of participants was female, 25–34 years of age, and employed (full or part time). We found that CO safety knowledge did not differ between settings at enrollment, but significantly improved at the follow-up visits. The majority of CO detectors observed were functional and installed in the correct location. Of those with CO detectors at follow up, the majority had not replaced the battery. The success of the intervention varied between settings and distribution methods. The majority of participants showed improved knowledge and behaviors. Improved device technology may be needed to eliminate the need for battery replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29154522      PMCID: PMC5726559     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Health        ISSN: 0022-0892            Impact factor:   1.179


  11 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of controlled trials of interventions to promote smoke alarms.

Authors:  C DiGuiseppi; J P Higgins
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Strategies to increase smoke alarm use in high-risk households.

Authors:  Pauline A Harvey; Mary Aitken; George W Ryan; Lori A Demeter; Jeanne Givens; Ramya Sundararaman; Scott Goulette
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2004-10

Review 3.  Network meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to increase the uptake of smoke alarms.

Authors:  Nicola J Cooper; Denise Kendrick; Felix Achana; Paula Dhiman; Zhimin He; Persephone Wynn; Elodie Le Cozannet; Pedro Saramago; Alex J Sutton
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Risk and protective factors for fires, burns, and carbon monoxide poisoning in U.S. households.

Authors:  Carol W Runyan; Renee M Johnson; Jingzhen Yang; Anna E Waller; David Perkis; Stephen W Marshall; Tamera Coyne-Beasley; Kara S McGee
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Carbon monoxide: the case for environmental public health surveillance.

Authors:  Judith M Graber; Steven C Macdonald; Daniel E Kass; Andrew E Smith; Henry A Anderson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 6.  Carbon monoxide poisoning--a public health perspective.

Authors:  J A Raub; M Mathieu-Nolf; N B Hampson; S R Thom
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 4.221

7.  Hospital burden of unintentional carbon monoxide poisoning in the United States, 2007.

Authors:  Shahed Iqbal; Huay-Zong Law; Jacquelyn H Clower; Fuyuen Y Yip; Anne Elixhauser
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.469

Review 8.  Interventions for promoting smoke alarm ownership and function.

Authors:  C DiGuiseppi; J P Higgins
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

9.  Residential carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning risks: correlates of observed CO alarm use in urban households.

Authors:  Eileen M McDonald; Andrea C Gielen; Wendy C Shields; Rebecca Stepnitz; Elizabeth Parker; Xia Ma; David Bishai
Journal:  J Environ Health       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.179

10.  Nonfatal, unintentional, non--fire-related carbon monoxide exposures--United States, 2004-2006.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development and Evaluation of a Theory-Based Approach to Reducing Carbon Monoxide (CO) Morbidity and Mortality: The CO Blitz Model.

Authors:  Robin M Dawson; Amber Proctor Williams; James Richardson
Journal:  J Community Health Nurs       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.951

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.