| Literature DB >> 29154399 |
Emily R Dworkin1, Nicole E Allen2.
Abstract
Balancing risks and benefits is a necessary ethical task for social science researchers. Community psychologists must often consider risks and benefits not just for individual participants, but also for the group, system, or society that those individuals inhabit. Little ethical guidance currently exists for how to navigate this ethical challenge across these multiple levels. In this article, we use a case example of social network research incorporating multiple levels of analysis to identify common risks and benefits and understand their relationship to each other. We conclude by discussing distinctive ethical considerations revealed by this case example. © Society for Community Research and Action 2017.Entities:
Keywords: Ethics; Group research; Research methods; Social network analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29154399 PMCID: PMC5729078 DOI: 10.1002/ajcp.12184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Community Psychol ISSN: 0091-0562