Kazumasa Fuwa1,2, Mitsuko Seki2, Yoshiyasu Hirata3, Itaru Yanagihara4, Yukiko Nakura4, Chika Takano1,2, Kazumichi Kuroda2, Satoshi Hayakawa2. 1. Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Division of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Hirata Clinic, Saitama, Japan. 4. Department of Developmental Medicine, Research Institute, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Abstract
PROBLEM: Ureaplasma species occasionally cause chorioamnionitis and premature labor. We developed a novel assay employing a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method to detect Ureaplasma parvum and Ureaplasma urealyticum. METHOD OF STUDY: Loop-mediated isothermal amplification primers were designed to amplify Ureaplasma-specific ureaseB genes. Four U. parvum strains, 5 U. urealyticum strains and 14 reference bacterial species were evaluated. Forty-six vaginal swab samples were analyzed by LAMP, culture, and PCR. RESULTS: Our LAMP primers were specific to each species and had no cross-reaction. Of 46 clinical specimens, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the LAMP method were 100% (12/12), 100% (34/34), 100% (12/12), and 100% (34/34), respectively, whereas those of PCR were 66.7% (8/12), 100% (34/34), 100% (8/8), and 89.5% (34/38), respectively, compared to culture-based detection. CONCLUSION: The LAMP detection method outperformed the culture and PCR methods. Early detection enables appropriate antibiotic selection for improved prenatal outcomes.
PROBLEM: Ureaplasma species occasionally cause chorioamnionitis and premature labor. We developed a novel assay employing a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method to detect Ureaplasma parvum and Ureaplasma urealyticum. METHOD OF STUDY: Loop-mediated isothermal amplification primers were designed to amplify Ureaplasma-specific ureaseB genes. Four U. parvum strains, 5 U. urealyticum strains and 14 reference bacterial species were evaluated. Forty-six vaginal swab samples were analyzed by LAMP, culture, and PCR. RESULTS: Our LAMP primers were specific to each species and had no cross-reaction. Of 46 clinical specimens, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the LAMP method were 100% (12/12), 100% (34/34), 100% (12/12), and 100% (34/34), respectively, whereas those of PCR were 66.7% (8/12), 100% (34/34), 100% (8/8), and 89.5% (34/38), respectively, compared to culture-based detection. CONCLUSION: The LAMP detection method outperformed the culture and PCR methods. Early detection enables appropriate antibiotic selection for improved prenatal outcomes.