Yena Lee1, Joshua D Rosenblat2, JungGoo Lee3, Nicole E Carmona4, Mehala Subramaniapillai4, Margarita Shekotikhina5, Rodrigo B Mansur2, Elisa Brietzke6, Jae-Hon Lee7, Roger C Ho8, Samantha J Yim4, Roger S McIntyre9. 1. Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. 2. Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 3. Paik Institute for Clinical Research, Inje University, Busan, Republic of Korea; Department of Health Science and Technology, Graduate School, Inje University, Busan, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea. 4. Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. 5. Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. 6. Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 7. Department of Psychiatry, Ansan Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, Ansan, Republic of Korea. 8. Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 9. Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: roger.mcintyre@uhn.ca.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Work-related disability and productivity loss in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) are critical determinants of patient quality of life and contribute significantly to the human and economic costs of MDD. Notwithstanding the return to work and pre-morbid levels of functioning as a critical therapeutic objective among individuals with MDD, it is unclear whether antidepressant treatment significantly and reliably improves measures of workplace functioning. Herein, we investigate to what extent antidepressant treatment improves workplace functioning among adults with MDD. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled or active comparator clinical trials primarily or secondarily investigating the efficacy of antidepressant agents on subjective ratings of workplace functioning and/or measures of work absence. RESULTS: Thirteen placebo-controlled and four active comparator clinical trials reported on the efficacy of agomelatine, bupropion, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, levomilnacipran, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, or vortioxetine on subjective measures of workplace impairment. Overall, antidepressant treatment improved standardized measures of workplace functioning (e.g., Sheehan Disability Scale-work item). One placebo-controlled trial of agomelatine and one clinical trial comparing the efficacy of vortioxetine to that of venlafaxine had mixed results on measures of work absence. LIMITATIONS: Included interventional trials evaluated work-related disability as a secondary outcome using subjective rating scales. CONCLUSION: Extant data suggest that antidepressant treatment improves workplace outcomes in MDD. The capability of antidepressants in improving measures of workplace functioning should be considered in cost-benefit analyses to better inform cost-modelling studies pertaining to antidepressant therapy.
INTRODUCTION: Work-related disability and productivity loss in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) are critical determinants of patient quality of life and contribute significantly to the human and economic costs of MDD. Notwithstanding the return to work and pre-morbid levels of functioning as a critical therapeutic objective among individuals with MDD, it is unclear whether antidepressant treatment significantly and reliably improves measures of workplace functioning. Herein, we investigate to what extent antidepressant treatment improves workplace functioning among adults with MDD. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled or active comparator clinical trials primarily or secondarily investigating the efficacy of antidepressant agents on subjective ratings of workplace functioning and/or measures of work absence. RESULTS: Thirteen placebo-controlled and four active comparator clinical trials reported on the efficacy of agomelatine, bupropion, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, levomilnacipran, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, or vortioxetine on subjective measures of workplace impairment. Overall, antidepressant treatment improved standardized measures of workplace functioning (e.g., Sheehan Disability Scale-work item). One placebo-controlled trial of agomelatine and one clinical trial comparing the efficacy of vortioxetine to that of venlafaxine had mixed results on measures of work absence. LIMITATIONS: Included interventional trials evaluated work-related disability as a secondary outcome using subjective rating scales. CONCLUSION: Extant data suggest that antidepressant treatment improves workplace outcomes in MDD. The capability of antidepressants in improving measures of workplace functioning should be considered in cost-benefit analyses to better inform cost-modelling studies pertaining to antidepressant therapy.
Authors: Shane J McInerney; Trisha Chakrabarty; Malgorzata Maciukiewicz; Benicio N Frey; Glenda M MacQueen; Roumen V Milev; Arun V Ravindran; Susan Rotzinger; Sidney H Kennedy; Raymond W Lam Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2020-12-23 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Carola Rong; Caroline Park; Joshua D Rosenblat; Mehala Subramaniapillai; Hannah Zuckerman; Dominika Fus; Yena L Lee; Zihang Pan; Elisa Brietzke; Rodrigo B Mansur; Danielle S Cha; Leanna M W Lui; Roger S McIntyre Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Shea Q Foo; Wilson W Tam; Cyrus S Ho; Bach X Tran; Long H Nguyen; Roger S McIntyre; Roger C Ho Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Maria Luisa Scapellato; Vera Comiati; Alessandra Buja; Giulia Buttignol; Romina Valentini; Valentina Burati; Lucia La Serra; Isabella Maccà; Paola Mason; Pasquale Scopa; Anna Volpin; Andrea Trevisan; Paolo Spinella Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sabina Asensio-Cuesta; Adrián Bresó; Carlos Saez; Juan M García-Gómez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Syeda Fabeha Husain; Rongjun Yu; Tong-Boon Tang; Wilson W Tam; Bach Tran; Travis T Quek; Shi-Hui Hwang; Cheryl W Chang; Cyrus S Ho; Roger C Ho Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 4.379