Literature DB >> 29154062

Survey of complementary and alternative medicine in pediatric inpatient settings.

Sam Stubblefield1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: While use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is common in children, we know little about its use for hospitalized children. This survey measured the rate of CAM use, specific modalities used, and policies related to CAM use for hospitalized children.
DESIGN: Anonymous survey of hospitals in the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings (PRĪS) network
SETTING: Hospitals in the PRĪS network. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of overall and specific CAM modality use, including whether these modalities are provided, permitted, or prohibited, and presence of a written policy on CAM use.
RESULTS: Of 99 sites queried, 22 responded. Of these, 82% of sites reported some CAM presence, and 63% reported official provision of CAM therapies. Freestanding children's hospitals provided more modalities than other types of hospitals. There was no difference in number of modalities by geographic location. The most commonly provided CAM modalities were massage and biofield therapies. The most commonly prohibited modalities were inpatient placebos outside of research settings, medical marijuana, and inpatient homeopathic preparations. Only one site reported having a written policy on CAM use.
CONCLUSIONS: Among responding institutions, the most reported some CAM presence with a wide variety of CAM modalities provided and permitted. Written institutional policies on CAM were rare.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inpatient; Pediatric; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29154062     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2017.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Complement Ther Med        ISSN: 0965-2299            Impact factor:   2.446


  3 in total

1.  Complementary and alternative medicine use by pediatric oncology patients before, during, and after treatment.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Lüthi; Manuel Diezi; Nadia Danon; Julie Dubois; Jérôme Pasquier; Bernard Burnand; Pierre-Yves Rodondi
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2021-03-18

2.  Do patients of integrative anthroposophic pediatric inpatient departments differ? Comparative analysis to all pediatric inpatients in Germany considering demographic and clinical characteristics.

Authors:  Katharina Fetz; Thomas Ostermann; Melanie Schwermer; Sebastian Appelbaum; Jan Vagedes; Tycho Jan Zuzak; Alfred Längler
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Comparative analysis of resource utilization in integrative anthroposophic and all German pediatric inpatient departments.

Authors:  Katharina Fetz; Alfred Längler; Melanie Schwermer; Clara Carvalho-Hilje; Jan Vagedes; Tycho Jan Zuzak; Thomas Ostermann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.