BACKGROUND: Buparlisib is an oral pan-class I phosphotidyinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor. The present phase I study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of buparlisib with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received buparlisib once daily (range, 50 to 100 mg) for 3 weeks with capecitabine twice daily (range, 1000 to 1250 mg/m2) for 2 weeks with a 1-week break. Dose escalation used a traditional "3 + 3" design with standard definitions of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose. RESULTS: Of the 25 patients enrolled, 23 were evaluable for DLT and 17 were evaluable for response. The maximum tolerated dose of the combination was buparlisib 100 mg daily and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily. DLTs included grade 3 hyperglycemia and grade 3 confusion. The most common grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transaminase. One patient exhibited a complete response to treatment and four had a confirmed partial response. In cohorts 3 and 4, in which the buparlisib dose remained constant but the capecitabine dose was increased, significant increases in the buparlisib plasma concentration were noted. CONCLUSION: The combination of buparlisib with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer was generally well-tolerated, with several patients demonstrating prolonged responses. Unexpectedly low rates of PIK3CA mutations (3 of 17) were seen, and only 2 of 7 tumors with subtyping were luminal, making exploration of these putative predictive markers impossible. Further study of the combination is not unreasonable, with expanded pharmacokinetics and sequencing analysis to better elucidate potential drug-drug interactions and more accurate predictive biomarkers of response.
BACKGROUND:Buparlisib is an oral pan-class I phosphotidyinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor. The present phase I study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of buparlisib with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received buparlisib once daily (range, 50 to 100 mg) for 3 weeks with capecitabine twice daily (range, 1000 to 1250 mg/m2) for 2 weeks with a 1-week break. Dose escalation used a traditional "3 + 3" design with standard definitions of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose. RESULTS: Of the 25 patients enrolled, 23 were evaluable for DLT and 17 were evaluable for response. The maximum tolerated dose of the combination was buparlisib 100 mg daily and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily. DLTs included grade 3 hyperglycemia and grade 3 confusion. The most common grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transaminase. One patient exhibited a complete response to treatment and four had a confirmed partial response. In cohorts 3 and 4, in which the buparlisib dose remained constant but the capecitabine dose was increased, significant increases in the buparlisib plasma concentration were noted. CONCLUSION: The combination of buparlisib with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer was generally well-tolerated, with several patients demonstrating prolonged responses. Unexpectedly low rates of PIK3CA mutations (3 of 17) were seen, and only 2 of 7 tumors with subtyping were luminal, making exploration of these putative predictive markers impossible. Further study of the combination is not unreasonable, with expanded pharmacokinetics and sequencing analysis to better elucidate potential drug-drug interactions and more accurate predictive biomarkers of response.
Authors: Mathilde Guerin; Keyvan Rezai; Nicolas Isambert; Mario Campone; Aurélie Autret; Jihane Pakradouni; Magali Provansal; Jacques Camerlo; Renaud Sabatier; François Bertucci; Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret; Alice Hervieu; Jean-Marc Extra; Patrice Viens; François Lokiec; Jean-Marie Boher; Anthony Gonçalves Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2017-09-23 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: J A Oshaughnessy; J Blum; V Moiseyenko; S E Jones; D Miles; D Bell; R Rosso; L Mauriac; B Osterwalder; H U Burger; S Laws Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: M Martín; A Chan; L Dirix; J O'Shaughnessy; R Hegg; A Manikhas; M Shtivelband; P Krivorotko; N Batista López; M Campone; M Ruiz Borrego; Q J Khan; J T Beck; M Ramos Vázquez; P Urban; S Goteti; E Di Tomaso; C Massacesi; S Delaloge Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Filip Janku; Jennifer J Wheler; Aung Naing; Gerald S Falchook; David S Hong; Vanda M Stepanek; Siqing Fu; Sarina A Piha-Paul; J Jack Lee; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Therese Sorlie; Robert Tibshirani; Joel Parker; Trevor Hastie; J S Marron; Andrew Nobel; Shibing Deng; Hilde Johnsen; Robert Pesich; Stephanie Geisler; Janos Demeter; Charles M Perou; Per E Lønning; Patrick O Brown; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; David Botstein Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-06-26 Impact factor: 12.779
Authors: Andrea H Bild; Joel S Parker; Adam M Gustafson; Chaitanya R Acharya; Katherine A Hoadley; Carey Anders; P Kelly Marcom; Lisa A Carey; Anil Potti; Joseph R Nevins; Charles M Perou Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Anja Welt; Marcel Wiesweg; Sarah Theurer; Wolfgang Abenhardt; Matthias Groschek; Lothar Müller; Jan Schröder; Mitra Tewes; Marco Chiabudini; Karin Potthoff; Agnes Bankfalvi; Norbert Marschner; Martin Schuler; Frank Breitenbücher Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Siti Muhamad Nur Husna; Hern-Tze Tina Tan; Rohimah Mohamud; Anne Dyhl-Polk; Kah Keng Wong Journal: Ther Adv Med Oncol Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 8.168
Authors: Ana C Garrido-Castro; Cristina Saura; Romualdo Barroso-Sousa; Hao Guo; Eva Ciruelos; Begoña Bermejo; Joaquin Gavilá; Violeta Serra; Aleix Prat; Laia Paré; Pamela Céliz; Patricia Villagrasa; Yisheng Li; Jennifer Savoie; Zhan Xu; Carlos L Arteaga; Ian E Krop; David B Solit; Gordon B Mills; Lewis C Cantley; Eric P Winer; Nancy U Lin; Jordi Rodon Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 6.466