Literature DB >> 29153847

Effect of incentive payments on chronic disease management and health services use in British Columbia, Canada: Interrupted time series analysis.

M Ruth Lavergne1, Michael R Law2, Sandra Peterson2, Scott Garrison3, Jeremiah Hurley4, Lucy Cheng2, Kimberlyn McGrail2.   

Abstract

We studied the effects of incentive payments to primary care physicians for the care of patients with diabetes, hypertension, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in British Columbia, Canada. We used linked administrative health data to examine monthly primary care visits, continuity of care, laboratory testing, pharmaceutical dispensing, hospitalizations, and total h ealth care spending. We examined periods two years before and two years after each incentive was introduced, and used segmented regression to assess whether there were changes in level or trend of outcome measures across all eligible patients following incentive introduction, relative to pre-intervention periods. We observed no increases in primary care visits or continuity of care after incentives were introduced. Rates of ACR testing and antihypertensive dispensing increased among patients with hypertension, but none of the other modest increases in laboratory testing or prescriptions dispensed reached statistical significance. Rates of hospitalizations for stroke and heart failure among patients with hypertension fell relative to pre-intervention patterns, while hospitalizations for COPD increased. Total hospitalizations and hospitalizations via the emergency department did not change. Health care spending increased for patients with hypertension. This large-scale incentive scheme for primary care physicians showed some positive effects for patients with hypertension, but we observe no similar changes in patient management, reductions in hospitalizations, or changes in spending for patients with diabetes and COPD.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Administrative data uses; Chronic disease; Incentives in health care; Primary care; Time series analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29153847     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  9 in total

1.  Segmented generalized mixed effect models to evaluate health outcomes.

Authors:  Sahar Saeed; Erica E M Moodie; Erin C Strumpf; Marina B Klein
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Patient and primary care physician characteristics associated with billing incentives for chronic diseases in British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kimberlyn McGrail; M Ruth Lavergne; Megan Ahuja; Seles Yung; Sandra Peterson
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-05-05

3.  Physician Financial Incentives to Reduce Unplanned Hospital Readmissions: an Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

Authors:  John A Staples; Guiping Liu; Jeffrey R Brubacher; Ahmer Karimuddin; Jason M Sutherland
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings.

Authors:  Liying Jia; Qingyue Meng; Anthony Scott; Beibei Yuan; Lu Zhang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-20

5.  Control charts for chronic disease surveillance: testing algorithm sensitivity to changes in data coding.

Authors:  Naomi C Hamm; Depeng Jiang; Ruth Ann Marrie; Pourang Irani; Lisa M Lix
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Primary care for individuals with serious mental illness (PriSMI): protocol for a convergent mixed methods study.

Authors:  Agnes Grudniewicz; Allie Peckham; David Rudoler; M Ruth Lavergne; Rachelle Ashcroft; Kimberly Corace; Mark Kaluzienski; Ridhwana Kaoser; Lucie Langford; Rita McCracken; W Craig Norris; Anne O'Riordan; Kevin Patrick; Sandra Peterson; Ellen Randall; Jennifer Rayner; Christian G Schütz; Nadiya Sunderji; Helen Thai; Paul Kurdyak
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Advancing virtual primary care for people with opioid use disorder (VPC OUD): a mixed-methods study protocol.

Authors:  Lindsay Hedden; Rita K McCracken; Sarah Spencer; Shawna Narayan; Ellie Gooderham; Paxton Bach; Jade Boyd; Christina Chakanyuka; Kanna Hayashi; Jan Klimas; Michael Law; Kimberlyn McGrail; Bohdan Nosyk; Sandra Peterson; Christy Sutherland; Lianping Ti; Seles Yung; Fred Cameron; Renee Fernandez; Amanda Giesler; Nardia Strydom
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Is the evidence on the effectiveness of pay for performance schemes in healthcare changing? Evidence from a meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Arezou Zaresani; Anthony Scott
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Patient characteristics associated with enrolment under voluntary programs implemented within fee-for-service systems in British Columbia and Quebec: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  M Ruth Lavergne; Caroline King; Sandra Peterson; Leora Simon; Catherine Hudon; Christine Loignon; Rita K McCracken; Austyn Brackett; Kim McGrail; Erin Strumpf
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2022-02-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.