Literature DB >> 29153745

Analysis of the golden proportion and width/height ratios of maxillary anterior teeth in Arab and Kurdish populations.

Neda Al-Kaisy1, Balkees Taha Garib2.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Dentists providing anterior restorations are guided by the principles of anatomic tooth dimension. Dental biometrics should consider ethnicity to produce a more comprehensive evaluation.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to analyze the anatomic crowns of maxillary central incisors (CI), lateral incisors (LI), and canines (C) with respect to the golden proportion (GP) and width/height (W/H) ratio in Kurdish and Arab populations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Maxillary gypsum casts were obtained from 100 participants (50 from a Kurdish and 50 from an Arab population). Standardized digital photographs of each cast were recorded. The apparent and actual anterior tooth dimensions were determined by ImageJ software for the calculation of the GP and W/H ratio. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA to investigate ethnic, sex, and arch side differences. The chi-square test was used to explore the GP, and the 1-sample t test was used to test the ideal W/H ratio (α=.05).
RESULTS: The GP was found in both the Kurdish and Arab groups in the LI/CI mean (0.62, 0.63), but not in the C/LI mean (0.69, 0.73). No difference due to sex was detected in the LI/CI in either ethnic group, but Kurdish men had significantly larger C/LI than women (0.73, 0.66, P=.006) and larger right-side LI/CI than left (0.63, 0.60, P=.049). The W/H ratio was higher than the predicted ideal ratio of 80% (range, 88% to 90%). The LI W/H ratio in Arabs was significantly larger than in Kurds (90.3% versus 82.7%, respectively; P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The GP was found to exist between the apparent widths of maxillary anterior teeth LI/CI for the both populations in both men and women but not for C/LI. No ideal ratio was detected for the W/H ratios. Specific population characteristics must be taken into consideration, especially when applying the proportions to Kurdish individuals.
Copyright © 2018 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29153745     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  6 in total

1.  [Esthetic proportions of maxillary anterior teeth of 120 Chinese adults].

Authors:  W L Wu; X Zeng; X Q Liu; J G Tan
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-12-18

2.  Evaluation of "Golden Proportion" in Saudi individuals with natural smiles.

Authors:  Amal Ali Swelem; Eman MohamedZaghloul Al-Rafah
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2019-01-29

3.  Evaluation of maxillary anterior teeth proportion with Chu's Gauge in a population of Central India: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Sukhada Arun Wagh; Sneha S Mantri; Abhilasha Bhasin
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2020-01-31

4.  A 2D Photographic and 3D Digital Dental Model Analysis of Golden Percentage in Maxillary Anterior Teeth.

Authors:  Naseer Ahmed; Mohamad Syahrizal Bin Halim; Zuryati Ab Ghani; Zafar Ali Khan; Maria Shakoor Abbasi; Nafij Bin Jamayet; Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Golden Standard and Golden Proportion of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Among Saudi Population in Makkah.

Authors:  Mohamed Fattouh Abdallah; Omer H Alamoudi; Abdullah Muneer Ali; Raian A Marzogi; Mohammed A Bafaraj; Wahdan Mohammed Abdelghany Elkwatehy
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2021-06-10

6.  Anterior Tooth Width Measurements among Patients in a Tertiary Hospital of Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Prabhat Shrestha; Sabina Paudel; Madhu Neupane; Suman Lamba
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 0.406

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.