Literature DB >> 29153632

A 2- to 16-Year Clinical Follow-Up of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a New Acetabular Implant Combined With Impacted Bone Allografts and a Cemented Cup.

Hampus Stigbrand1, Oscar Gustafsson2, Gösta Ullmark1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of acetabular bone loss with impaction bone grafting (IBG) at revision total hip arthroplasty is highly dependent on mechanical stability and graft compression for clinical success. Here, we describe a new technique to further compress and stabilize the acetabular graft bed with a thin, perforated titanium shell.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 170 cases of acetabular revision arthroplasty 7 years (standard deviation 2.8) after IBG combined with a graft-compressing titanium shell implant. The patients were reviewed by clinical score and radiography. Three patients were lost to follow-up. The medical journals of the 33 deceased cases were reviewed for any reoperation. Of the 170 cases, 74 had a cavitary acetabular bone defect, 93 had combined segmental and cavitary bone defects, and 3 had a pelvic dissociation. Bone graft incorporation was assessed and correction of the hip center of rotation was calculated.
RESULTS: Five cases (3%) were reoperated for mechanical loosening. One more was assessed as loose but asymptomatic and was not planned for revision. There were 3 reoperations for recurrent dislocation, 2 for deep infection and 1 for technical error. Reoperation for any reason, as the end point of survivorship, showed a survival rate of 92% after 10 years. Hip score according to Merle, d'Aubigne, and Postel increased from 10.8 (preoperatively) to 16.4 at follow-up. The clinical and radiological results were excellent.
CONCLUSION: IBG combined with the compressing shell results in excellent results for this challenging condition.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acetabulum; bone defect; cement; impaction bone grafting; revision; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29153632     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  4 in total

1.  Implant migration and bone mineral density measured simultaneously by low-dose CT scans: a 2-year study on 17 acetabular revisions with impaction bone grafting.

Authors:  Hampus Stigbrand; Keenan Brown; Henrik Olivecrona; Gösta Ullmark
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 2.  Conversion from a failed proximal femoral nail anti-rotation to a cemented or uncemented total hip arthroplasty device: a retrospective review of 198 hips with previous intertrochanteric femur fractures.

Authors:  Weiguang Yu; Xiulan Han; Wenli Chen; Shuai Mao; Mingdong Zhao; Xinchao Zhang; Guowei Han; Junxing Ye; Meiji Chen; Jintao Zhuang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 3.  A Review and Description of Acetabular Impaction Bone Grafting: Updating the Traditional Technique.

Authors:  Aun H Mirza; Shahzad Sadiq
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2021-12-01

4.  A novel, multi-level approach to assess allograft incorporation in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tim Rolvien; Christian Friesecke; Sebastian Butscheidt; Thorsten Gehrke; Michael Hahn; Klaus Püschel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.