Literature DB >> 29153513

Biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus dairy isolates representing different genotypes.

E Thiran1, P A Di Ciccio2, H U Graber1, E Zanardi2, A Ianieri2, J Hummerjohann3.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the biofilm-forming capabilities of different genotypes of Staphylococcus aureus dairy isolates from Switzerland and northern Italy, including Staph. aureus genotype B (GTB) and methicillin-resistant Staph.aureus (MRSA). We hypothesized that biofilm formation might be more pronounced in the contagious GTB isolates compared with other genotypes affecting individual animals. Twenty-four dairy isolates, including 9 MRSA, were further characterized by genotyping by using ribosomal spacer PCR, spa typing, biofilm formation under static and dynamic conditions, and scanning electron microscopy. The GTB isolates (n = 6) were more able to form biofilms than other genotypes at 37°C and at 20°C after 48 and 72 h of incubation in the static assay using polystyrene microtiter plates. This result was supported by scanning electron micrographs showing a GTB isolate producing strong biofilm with extracellular matrix in contrast to a genotype C isolate. Furthermore, none of the MRSA isolates formed strong biofilms in the static assay. However, some MRSA produced low or moderate amounts of biofilm depending on the applied conditions. Under dynamic conditions, a much more diverse situation was observed. The ability of GTB isolates to be strong biofilm formers was not observed in all cases, emphasizing the importance of growth conditions for the expression of biofilm-related genes. No specific genotype, spa type, or MRSA isolate could be categorized significantly into one level of biofilm formation. Nineteen percent of isolates behaved similarly under static and dynamic conditions. The results of this study expand our knowledge of different dairy-related Staph. aureus subtypes and indicate the benefit of genotyping when biofilms are studied. The Authors. Published by the Federation of Animal Science Societies and Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Staphylococcus aureus; biofilm; genotype; spa type

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29153513     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  9 in total

1.  Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus from Pets, Livestock, and Wild Animals: Relationship with Clonal Lineages and Antimicrobial Resistance.

Authors:  Vanessa Silva; Elisete Correia; José Eduardo Pereira; Camino González-Machado; Rosa Capita; Carlos Alonso-Calleja; Gilberto Igrejas; Patrícia Poeta
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-04

2.  Emerging vancomycin-non susceptible coagulase negative Staphylococci associated with skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  Paul A Akinduti; Yemisi Dorcas Obafemi; Harriet Ugboko; Maged El-Ashker; Olayemi Akinnola; Chioma Jane Agunsoye; Abiola Oladotun; Bruno S J Phiri; Solomon U Oranusi
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 6.781

Review 3.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in food and the prevalence in Brazil: a review.

Authors:  Anderson Clayton da Silva; Marjory Xavier Rodrigues; Nathália Cristina Cirone Silva
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.476

4.  Concerted dispersion of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm by bacteriophage and 'green synthesized' silver nanoparticles.

Authors:  Salim Manoharadas; Mohammad Altaf; Abdulwahed Fahad Alrefaei; Rajesh Mamkulatil Devasia; Ahmed Yacine M Badjah Hadj; Mohammed Saeed Ali Abuhasil
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.361

5.  Phenotypic and Genotypic Detection of Biofilm-Forming Staphylococcus aureus from Different Food Sources in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Fatimah Muhammad Ballah; Md Saiful Islam; Md Liton Rana; Farhana Binte Ferdous; Rokeya Ahmed; Pritom Kumar Pramanik; Jarna Karmoker; Samina Ievy; Md Abdus Sobur; Mahbubul Pratik Siddique; Mst Minara Khatun; Marzia Rahman; Md Tanvir Rahman
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22

6.  Antibiotics Resistance and Virulence of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Isolated from Raw Milk from Handmade Dairy Retail Stores in Hefei City, China.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Jiawei Shen; Chengfeng Zhu; Kai Ma; Mengcheng Fang; Bingbing Li; Wenhui Wang; Ting Xue
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-22

7.  Milk microbial composition of Brazilian dairy cows entering the dry period and genomic comparison between Staphylococcus aureus strains susceptible to the bacteriophage vB_SauM-UFV_DC4.

Authors:  Vinícius da Silva Duarte; Laura Treu; Cristina Sartori; Roberto Sousa Dias; Isabela da Silva Paes; Marcella Silva Vieira; Gabriele Rocha Santana; Marcos Inácio Marcondes; Alessio Giacomini; Viviana Corich; Stefano Campanaro; Cynthia Canedo da Silva; Sérgio Oliveira de Paula
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Genome Mining and Comparative Pathogenomic Analysis of An Endemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Clone, ST612-CC8-t1257-SCCmec_IVd(2B), Isolated in South Africa.

Authors:  Daniel Gyamfi Amoako; Anou M Somboro; Akebe Luther King Abia; Mushal Allam; Arshad Ismail; Linda A Bester; Sabiha Y Essack
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2019-09-27

Review 9.  The Use of Ozone as an Eco-Friendly Strategy against Microbial Biofilm in Dairy Manufacturing Plants: A Review.

Authors:  Felice Panebianco; Selene Rubiola; Pierluigi Aldo Di Ciccio
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-01-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.