C Spink1, M Avanesov2, T Schmidt3, M Grass3, G Schoen4, G Adam2, A Koops2, H Ittrich2, P Bannas2. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: c.spink@uke.de. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 3. Philips Healthcare, Hamburg, Germany. 4. Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Comparison of radiation doses in patients undergoing angiographic bronchial artery embolization (BAE) before and after a noise reduction imaging technology upgrade. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 70 patients undergoing BAE. Procedures were performed before (n=32) and after (n=38) the technology upgrade containing additional filters and improved image-processing. Cumulative air kerma (AK), cumulative dose area product (DAP), number of exposure frames, total fluoroscopy time and amount of contrast agent were recorded. Mean values were calculated and compared using two-tailed t-tests. DSA image quality was assessed independently by two blinded readers and compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Using the new technology resulted in a significant reduction of 59% in DAP (149.2 (103.1-279.1) vs. 54.8 (38.2-100.7) Gy*cm2, p<0.001) and a significant reduction of 60% for AK (1.3 (0.6-1.9) vs. 0.5 (0.3-0.9) Gy, p<0.001) in comparison to procedures before the upgrade. There was no significant difference between the number of exposure frames in both groups (251±181 vs. 254±133 frames, p=0.07), time of fluoroscopy (28.8 (18.5-50.4) vs. 28.1 (23.3-38.7) min, p=0.73), or the amount of contrast agent used (139.5±70.8 vs. 163.1±63.1ml, p=0.11). No significant difference regarding image quality could be detected (3 (2,3) vs. 3 (2-4), p=0.64). CONCLUSIONS: The new angiographic noise reduction technology significantly decreases the radiation dose during bronchial artery embolization without compromising image quality or increasing time of fluoroscopy or contrast volume.
PURPOSE: Comparison of radiation doses in patients undergoing angiographic bronchial artery embolization (BAE) before and after a noise reduction imaging technology upgrade. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 70 patients undergoing BAE. Procedures were performed before (n=32) and after (n=38) the technology upgrade containing additional filters and improved image-processing. Cumulative air kerma (AK), cumulative dose area product (DAP), number of exposure frames, total fluoroscopy time and amount of contrast agent were recorded. Mean values were calculated and compared using two-tailed t-tests. DSA image quality was assessed independently by two blinded readers and compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Using the new technology resulted in a significant reduction of 59% in DAP (149.2 (103.1-279.1) vs. 54.8 (38.2-100.7) Gy*cm2, p<0.001) and a significant reduction of 60% for AK (1.3 (0.6-1.9) vs. 0.5 (0.3-0.9) Gy, p<0.001) in comparison to procedures before the upgrade. There was no significant difference between the number of exposure frames in both groups (251±181 vs. 254±133 frames, p=0.07), time of fluoroscopy (28.8 (18.5-50.4) vs. 28.1 (23.3-38.7) min, p=0.73), or the amount of contrast agent used (139.5±70.8 vs. 163.1±63.1ml, p=0.11). No significant difference regarding image quality could be detected (3 (2,3) vs. 3 (2-4), p=0.64). CONCLUSIONS: The new angiographic noise reduction technology significantly decreases the radiation dose during bronchial artery embolization without compromising image quality or increasing time of fluoroscopy or contrast volume.
Authors: Clemens Spink; Maxim Avanesov; Alexander Lenz; Frank Oliver Henes; Lennart Well; Thomas Schmidt; Gerhard Adam; Harald Ittrich; Peter Bannas Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 4.379