Literature DB >> 2915331

A comparison of the physical properties of four prosthetic veneering materials.

R M Jones1, C J Goodacre, B K Moore, R W Dykema.   

Abstract

Four resin materials used to veneer metal castings were compared by evaluating certain physical properties. Three of the materials were microfilled resins and one was an unfilled resin. Although no material proved to be superior in all of the tests, the microfilled materials were generally better than the unfilled materials. The heat- and pressure- polymerized microfilled material was inferior to the two light-polymerized microfilled materials in three of the physical property tests, superior to them in one test, and proved to be equivalent to them in two tests.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2915331     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90105-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of two dual-functional primers and a tribochemical surface modification system applied to the bonding of an indirect composite resin to metals.

Authors:  Hiroaki Yanagida; Naomi Tanoue; Takako Ide; Hideo Matsumura
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Effect of metal primers and tarnish treatment on bonding between dental alloys and veneer resin.

Authors:  Seung-Sik Choo; Yoon-Hyuk Huh; Lee-Ra Cho; Chan-Jin Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 1.904

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.