Literature DB >> 29153097

Clinical testing with a panel of 25 genes associated with increased cancer risk results in a significant increase in clinically significant findings across a broad range of cancer histories.

Eric T Rosenthal1, Ryan Bernhisel2, Krystal Brown2, John Kidd2, Susan Manley2.   

Abstract

Genetic testing for inherited cancer risk is now widely used to target individuals for screening and prevention. However, there is limited evidence available to evaluate the clinical utility of various testing strategies, such as single-syndrome, single-cancer, or pan-cancer gene panels. Here we report on the outcomes of testing with a 25-gene pan-cancer panel in a consecutive series of 252,223 individuals between September 2013 and July 2016. The majority of individuals (92.8%) met testing criteria for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) and/or Lynch syndrome (LS). Overall, 17,340 PVs were identified in 17,000 (6.7%) of the tested individuals. The PV positive rate was 9.8% among individuals with a personal cancer history, compared to 4.7% in unaffected individuals. PVs were most common in BRCA1/2 (42.2%), other breast cancer (BR) genes (32.9%), and the LS genes (13.2%). Half the PVs identified among individuals who met only HBOC testing criteria were in genes other than BRCA1/2. Similarly, half of PVs identified in individuals who met only LS testing criteria were in non-LS genes. These findings suggest that genetic testing with a pan-cancer panel in this cohort provides improved clinical utility over traditional single-gene or single-syndrome testing.
Copyright © 2017 Myriad Genetics, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome; Lynch syndrome; genetic testing; melanoma; pan-cancer panel; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29153097     DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2017.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Genet


  22 in total

Review 1.  Experiences of individuals with a variant of uncertain significance on genetic testing for hereditary cancer risks: a mixed method systematic review.

Authors:  Danielle Gould; Rachel Walker; Grace Makari-Judson; Memnun Seven
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-07-12

2.  Clinical implications of genetic testing in familial intermediate and late-onset colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Malene Djursby; Thomas van Overeem Hansen; Karin A W Wadt; Majbritt Busk Madsen; Lukas Adrian Berchtold; Charlotte Kvist Lautrup; Sara Markholt; Uffe Birk Jensen; Lotte Nylandsted Krogh; Malene Lundsgaard; Anne Marie Gerdes; Mef Nilbert; Christina Therkildsen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 5.881

3.  Prognostic significance of pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM and PALB2 genes in men undergoing hormonal therapy for advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hiroko Kimura; Kei Mizuno; Masaki Shiota; Shintaro Narita; Naoki Terada; Naohiro Fujimoto; Keiji Ogura; Shotaro Hatano; Yusuke Iwasaki; Nozomi Hakozaki; Satoshi Ishitoya; Takayuki Sumiyoshi; Takayuki Goto; Takashi Kobayashi; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Toshiyuki Kamoto; Masatoshi Eto; Tomonori Habuchi; Osamu Ogawa; Yukihide Momozawa; Shusuke Akamatsu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 9.075

4.  Statistical methods for Mendelian models with multiple genes and cancers.

Authors:  Jane W Liang; Gregory E Idos; Christine Hong; Stephen B Gruber; Giovanni Parmigiani; Danielle Braun
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  The Genetic Education for Men (GEM) Trial: Development of Web-Based Education for Untested Men in BRCA1/2-Positive Families.

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Mary Kate Ladd; Claudine Isaacs; Hannah Segal; Aryana Jacobs; Kathryn L Taylor; Kristi D Graves; Suzanne C O'Neill; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 6.  Cancer Genetic Counseling-Current Practice and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Jaclyn Schienda; Jill Stopfer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.159

7.  Clinical validity assessment of genes frequently tested on hereditary breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility sequencing panels.

Authors:  Kristy Lee; Bryce A Seifert; Hermela Shimelis; Rajarshi Ghosh; Stephanie B Crowley; Natalie J Carter; Kurston Doonanco; A Katherine Foreman; Deborah I Ritter; Sharisse Jimenez; Mackenzie Trapp; Kenneth Offit; Sharon E Plon; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Perceptions of provider's epistemic authority in response to variant of uncertain significance-related recommendations.

Authors:  Sukh Makhnoon; Maureen Mork; Banu Arun; Robert J Volk; Susan K Peterson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 9.  Recent Insights on Genetic Testing in Primary Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Mona Kafka; Cristian Surcel; Isabel Heidegger
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.074

10.  Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of the Diagnostic Yield and Patient Experience of Multiplex Gene Panel Testing For Hereditary Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Gregory E Idos; Allison W Kurian; Charité Ricker; Duveen Sturgeon; Julie O Culver; Kerry E Kingham; Rachel Koff; Nicolette M Chun; Courtney Rowe-Teeter; Alexandra P Lebensohn; Peter Levonian; Katrina Lowstuter; Katlyn Partynski; Christine Hong; Meredith A Mills; Iva Petrovchich; Cindy S Ma; Anne-Renee Hartman; Brian Allen; Richard J Wenstrup; Johnathan M Lancaster; Krystal Brown; John Kidd; Brent Evans; Bhramar Mukherjee; Kevin J McDonnell; Uri Ladabaum; James M Ford; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-03-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.