Literature DB >> 2915272

Relation of the pre-employment drug testing result to employment status: a one-year follow-up.

D C Parish1.   

Abstract

All employees hired over a six-month period at a large hospital underwent pre-employment urinary toxicology screening. Results of the screening were kept confidential. After a year of employment, the personnel folders of all employees studied were reviewed. Twenty-two of 180 employees (12%) had tested positive for drug use. Employees in clerical/aide positions were significantly more likely to test positive than were employees in professional positions (17% vs. 6%). Drug-positive employees were also more likely to be young and male. Comparison of job performance variables, job retention, supervisor evaluations, and reasons for termination showed no difference between drug-positive and drug-negative employees. Eleven drug-negative employees were fired during the study; no drug-positive employee was fired. There was a strongly significant difference between clerical and professional employees on each of these variables. This study did not find a relation between drug use and job performance. The widespread use of drug screening prior to employment makes further studies of this issue important.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2915272     DOI: 10.1007/BF02596490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  8 in total

1.  A drug abuse rehabilitation program.

Authors:  R R Hilker; F E Asma; A N Daghestani; R L Ross
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1975-06

2.  Mandatory unindicated urine drug screening: still chemical McCarthyism.

Authors:  G D Lundberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-12-05       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Routine urine testing for evidence of drug abuse in workers: the scientific, ethical and legal reasons not to do it.

Authors:  L Rosenstock; M R Cullen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Drug testing in the workplace--are methods legally defensible? A survey of experts, arbitrators, and testing laboratories.

Authors:  D W Hoyt; R E Finnigan; T Nee; T F Shults; T J Butler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987 Jul 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Drug population in one thousand geographically distributed urine specimens.

Authors:  D W Jones; D Adams; P A Martel; R J Rousseau
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.367

6.  Preemployment qualitative urine toxicology screening.

Authors:  R Lewy
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1983-08

7.  Detection and confirmation of urinary cannabinoids.

Authors:  C A Sutheimer; R Yarborough; B R Hepler; I Sunshine
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.367

8.  Changes in drug behavior from the middle to the late twenties: initiation, persistence, and cessation of use.

Authors:  V H Raveis; D B Kandel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 9.308

  8 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Pre-employment urine drug testing of hospital employees: future questions and review of current literature.

Authors:  M R Levine; W P Rennie
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Do drug-free workplace programs prevent occupational injuries? Evidence from Washington State.

Authors:  Thomas M Wickizer; Branko Kopjar; Gary Franklin; Jutta Joesch
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Preemployment drug screening in a large metropolitan medical center: a one-month trial.

Authors:  D A Smith; R Hanbury
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Chemical dependency and drug testing in the workplace.

Authors:  J D Osterloh; C E Becker
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-05

5.  Job performance and prescription vs. non-prescription drugs.

Authors:  R Lewy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Cannabis, motivation, and life satisfaction in an internet sample.

Authors:  Sara Smucker Barnwell; Mitch Earleywine; Rand Wilcox
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2006-01-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.