| Literature DB >> 29151974 |
Zhao-Ru Dong1,2, Jie Zou3, Dong Sun2, Guo-Ming Shi1, Ai-Wu Ke1, Jia-Bin Cai1, Hui-Chuan Sun1, Shuang-Jian Qiu1, Tao Li2, Jian Zhou1,4, Xu-Ting Zhi2, Jia Fan1,4.
Abstract
Surgical resection remains the initial treatment of choice for the majority of early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Although the factors that influence the prognosis of postoperative HCC patients have been well elucidated, there are a limited number of simple, objective, and distinct methods for estimating survival for postoperative patients with solitary HCC within the Milan criteria and Child-Pugh (C-P) A cirrhosis. The Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score is a new evidence-based approach to assess liver function. The ALBI score eliminates subjective variables, such as ascites and encephalopathy which are the requirements for the conventional C-P grading system. This study enrolled 654 patients to determine whether the ALBI score can predict the outcomes of postoperative solitary HCC patients within the Milan criteria and C-P A cirrhosis. Our results showed the ALBI score significantly influenced the overall survival and cumulative recurrence rates. Furthermore, the ALBI score was significantly related to the degree of liver cirrhosis and serum γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) concentration in solitary HCC cases within the Milan criteria and C-P A cirrhosis. Additionally, the combination of the ALBI score and serum GGT concentration contributed to the prognosis prediction in this cohort. In conclusion, we externally validated the ALBI grade as a novel biomarker to predict prognosis for solitary HCC within the Milan Criteria and C-P A cirrhosis.Entities:
Keywords: Albumin-Bilirubin Score; Child-Pugh A; HCC; Milan Criteria
Year: 2017 PMID: 29151974 PMCID: PMC5688940 DOI: 10.7150/jca.21313
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Figure 1OS (A) and DFS (B) curves for the ALBI grade I group and the ALBI grade II group in solitary HCC patients within Milan criteria and C-P A cirrhosis.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors of OS for the patients with solitary HCC within the Milan criteria and C-P A cirrhosis.
| Variable | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| χ2 value(Log-rank) | HR(95%Cl) | |||
| Sex (male/female) | 0.966 | 0.326 | - | n.a. |
| Age (≤52 vs >52 years) | 1.079 | 0.299 | - | n.a. |
| ALBI score | 10.938 | 0.001 | 1.026-1.800 | 0.033 |
| ALT (≤75 vs >75 U/L) | 0.264 | 0.607 | - | n.a. |
| AFP (≤400 vs >400 ng/ml) | 1.702 | 0.192 | - | n.a. |
| GGT (≤50 U/L vs >50 U/L) | 20.667 | <0.001 | 1.277-2.223 | <0.001 |
| Cirrhosis (mild/ severe) | 13.201 | <0.001 | 1.089-1.928 | 0.011 |
| Tumor diameter (≤2 vs >2 cm) | 0.545 | 0.460 | - | n.a. |
| Tumor capsule (positive vs negative) | 0.170 | 0.680 | - | n.a. |
| Tumor differentiation (III/IV vs I/II) | 4.483 | 0.034 | 1.036-1.962 | 0.029 |
n.a. not applicable.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors of DFS for the patients with solitary HCC within the Milan criteria and C-P A cirrhosis.
| Variable | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| χ2 value(Log-rank) | HR(95% Cl) | |||
| Sex (male/female) | 5.134 | 0.023 | 0.989-1.926 | 0.058 |
| Age (≤52 vs >52 years) | 0.346 | 0.557 | - | n.a. |
| ALBI score | 9.310 | 0.002 | 1.047-1.718 | 0.020 |
| ALT (≤75 vs >75 U/L) | 0.040 | 0.842 | - | n.a. |
| AFP (≤400 vs >400 ng/ml) | 1.857 | 0.173 | - | n.a. |
| GGT (≤50 U/L vs >50 U/L) | 11.610 | 0.001 | 1.052-1.686 | 0.017 |
| Cirrhosis (mild/ severe) | 5.181 | 0.023 | 0.923-1.491 | 0.191 |
| Tumor diameter (≤2 vs >2 cm) | 1.817 | 0.178 | - | n.a. |
| Tumor capsule (positive vs negative) | 2.589 | 0.108 | - | n.a. |
| Tumor differentiation (III/IV vs I/II) | 2.043 | 0.153 | - | n.a. |
n.a. not applicable.
Clinical features for the patients with solitary HCC within the Milan criteria and C-P A cirrhosis.
| Characteristics | ALBI score I (n = 477) | ALBI score II (n = 177) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male/female) | 395/82 | 142/35 | 0.444 |
| Age (≤52/ >52 years) | 247/230 | 83/94 | 0.267 |
| ALT (U/L) | |||
| ≤75 | 410 | 147 | 0.353 |
| >75 | 67 | 30 | |
| AFP (ng/ml) | |||
| ≤400 | 359 | 127 | 0.361 |
| >400 | 118 | 50 | |
| GGT(U/L) | |||
| ≤50 | 273 | 74 | <0.001 |
| >50 | 204 | 103 | |
| Tumor diameter (cm) | |||
| ≤2 | 119 | 54 | 0.152 |
| >2 | 358 | 123 | |
| Tumor capsule (positive vs negative) | 277/200 | 104/73 | 0.874 |
| Tumor differentiation (III/IV vs I/II) | 388/89 | 141/36 | 0.627 |
| Cirrhosis (mild/ severe) | 239/238 | 53/124 | <0.001 |
Figure 2The combination of ALBI score and serum GGT concentration for predicting the prognosis in our cohort. A and B: the OS and DFS curves for patients in ALBI grade I. C and D: the OS and DFS curves for patients in ALBI grade II.