| Literature DB >> 29151905 |
Katarzyna Jakubowska1, Wojciech Kisielewski2, Luiza Kańczuga-Koda1, Mariusz Koda3, Waldemar Famulski1,2.
Abstract
The local mechanisms of antitumor immune defense determine the development and organization of the tumor microenvironment, and the composition and relative proportions of the inflammatory cell population affect the quality and characteristics of the immune response. The aim of the present study was to conduct a quantitative morphological evaluation of two types of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TILs) populations, including those located in the stroma and intraepithelial cancer structures, in the invasive front and the center of the tumor in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The study included 160 patients with CRC who had undergone surgery. The tissue material was stained with hematoxylin and eosin, as used in routine histopathological diagnosis, and the two TIL populations were observed and counted with light microscopy. The relative extent of infiltration of stromal and intraepithelial TILs into the front and center of the primary tumors was similar. The extent of infiltration by stromal TILs was negatively correlated with the morphological features of tumor progression including the cancer infiltration of blood vessels (P=0.016), the invasion of lymph vessels (P=0.007), perineural invasion (P=0.036), lymph node involvement (P=0.047) and distant metastases (P=0.032). The infiltration by intraepithelial TILs was positively correlated with a desmoplastic reaction (P=0.002). Disease-free survival time was statistically shorter in patients without intraepithelial TILs in the center of the primary tumor mass (P=0.049; hazard ratio = 1.45). These results confirm that the infiltration of TILs into the invasive front and center of the tumor in patients with CRC serves an important role in the invasion and progression of the disease, and should be considered in routine histopathological examinations.Entities:
Keywords: colorectal cancer; immune response; tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Year: 2017 PMID: 29151905 PMCID: PMC5680638 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.7013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Assessment of TILs in stroma and in the inside of the cancer tubes in colorectal cancer tissue.
| A, Intraepithelial TILs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | No lymphocytes | ≥1 lymphocytes | P-value[ | |
| Invasive front of tumor | 32 | 128 | 0.179 | |
| Main mass of tumor | 36 | 124 | ||
| Invasive front of tumor | 91 | 44 | 25 | 0.474 |
| Main mass of tumor | 85 | 49 | 26 | |
Mann-Whitney U-test. TILs, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.
Figure 1.Intraepithelial TILs in tumor tissue samples. (A) Individual TILs in the invasive front and (B) numerous TILs in the primary mass of the tumor were identified (white arrows). (C) A number of patients did not exhibit intraepithelial TILs, whereas (D) stromal TILs were observed in the invasive front of the tumor in the majority of patients with colorectal cancer. TILs, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.
Correlation between TILs in stroma and in the inside of the cancer tubes and clinical features of colorectal cancer.
| Intraepithelial TILs | Stromal TILs | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | n | Invasive front | Tumor mass | Invasive front | Tumor mass | ||||
| Total | 160 | R | P-value[ | R | P-value[ | R | P-value[ | R | P-value[ |
| Age (years) | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| <60 | 40 | ||||||||
| >60 | 120 | ||||||||
| Sex | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | −0.191 | 0.022 | |
| Female | 64 | ||||||||
| Male | 96 | ||||||||
| Localization | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Right-side | 20 | ||||||||
| Transverse | 14 | ||||||||
| Left-side | 15 | ||||||||
| Sigmoid | 29 | ||||||||
| Rectum | 82 | ||||||||
| Tumor growth | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Expanding | 133 | ||||||||
| Infiltration | 27 | ||||||||
| Tumor size (cm) | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| <2.5 | 27 | ||||||||
| 2.5–5.0 | 106 | ||||||||
| >5.0 | 27 | ||||||||
| Tumor node metastasis stage | |||||||||
| 1 | 42 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | −0.170 | 0.041 |
| 2 | 31 | ||||||||
| 3 | 69 | ||||||||
| 4 | 18 | ||||||||
| Dukes stage | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | −0.190 | 0.022 | |
| A | 39 | ||||||||
| B | 35 | ||||||||
| C | 69 | ||||||||
| D | 17 | ||||||||
| Adenocarcinoma type | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Partim mucinous | 30 | ||||||||
| Nonmucinous | 130 | ||||||||
| Percentage of mucinous, % component | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| 10–30 | 15 | ||||||||
| 30–50 | 15 | ||||||||
| Grade of malignancies | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| 2 | 148 | ||||||||
| 3 | 12 | ||||||||
| Preoperative treatment | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Yes | 53 | ||||||||
| No | 107 | ||||||||
| Treatment response | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| SD | 26 | ||||||||
| PR | 27 | ||||||||
Spearman's correlation coefficient test. TILs, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; SD, stable disease; PR, partial response; NS, not statistically significant.
Correlation between TILs in stroma and in the inside of the cancer tubes and parameters of disease progression.
| Intraepithelial TILs | Stromal TILs | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Invasive front | Tumor mass | Invasive front | Tumor mass | |||||
| Variables | 160 | R | P-value[ | R | P-value[ | R | P-value[ | R | P-value[ |
| pT stage | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| 1 | 3 | ||||||||
| 2 | 62 | ||||||||
| 3 | 91 | ||||||||
| 4 | 4 | ||||||||
| Venous invasion | NS | NS | NS | NS | −0.200 | 0.016 | NS | NS | |
| Absent | 113 | ||||||||
| Present | 46 | ||||||||
| Lymphatic invasion | NS | NS | NS | NS | −0.224 | 0.007 | −0.186 | 0.025 | |
| Absent | 122 | ||||||||
| Present | 38 | ||||||||
| Perineural invasion | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Absent | 143 | ||||||||
| Present | 17 | ||||||||
| No. of removed lymph nodes | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| <5 | 14 | ||||||||
| 5–10 | 29 | ||||||||
| >10 | 117 | ||||||||
| Lymph node metastasis | NS | NS | NS | NS | −0.166 | 0.047 | NS | NS | |
| Absent | 81 | ||||||||
| Present | 79 | ||||||||
| Type of lymph node metastasis | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Micro | 27 | ||||||||
| Macro | 52 | ||||||||
| No. of metastatic lymph nodes | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| <5 | 49 | ||||||||
| >5 | 26 | ||||||||
| Lymph node pouch invasion | NS | NS | NS | NS | −0.170 | 0.041 | NS | NS | |
| Absent | 11 | ||||||||
| Present | 68 | ||||||||
| Distant metastasis | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | −0.178 | 0.032 | |
| Absent | 143 | ||||||||
| Present | 17 | ||||||||
| Distant metastasis size, mm | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | −0.178 | 0.034 | |
| <10 | 11 | ||||||||
| >10 | 6 | ||||||||
| Tumor deposits | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Absent | 133 | ||||||||
| Present | 27 | ||||||||
| Size of tumor deposits, mm | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| <2.5 | 10 | ||||||||
| >2.5 | 17 | ||||||||
Spearman's correlation coefficient test. NS, not statistically significant.
Correlation between TILs in stroma and in the inside of the cancer tubes and morphological variables of colorectal cancer.
| Intraepithelial TILs | Stromal TILs | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Invasive front | Tumor mass | Invasive front | Tumor mass | |||||
| Variables | 160 | R | P-value[ | R | P-value[ | R | P-value[ | R | P-value[ |
| Tumor stroma percentage, % | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | −0.204 | 0.019 | |
| <50 | 94 | ||||||||
| >50 | 66 | ||||||||
| Tumor budding | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Absent | 94 | ||||||||
| Present | 66 | ||||||||
| Inflammatory cell infiltrate in the invasive front of tumor | 0.178 | 0.033 | NS | NS | 0.631 | 0.000 | 0.445 | 0.000 | |
| Absent | 20 | ||||||||
| Weak | 66 | ||||||||
| Moderate | 48 | ||||||||
| Strong | 26 | ||||||||
| Inflammatory cell infiltrate in the center of tumor mass | 0.195 | 0.019 | 0.186 | 0.026 | 0.318 | 0.000 | 0.658 | 0.000 | |
| Absent | 11 | ||||||||
| Weak | 76 | ||||||||
| Moderate | 51 | ||||||||
| Strong | 22 | ||||||||
| Crohn's-like lymphocyte aggregates | 0.264 | 0.001 | 0.198 | 0.017 | 0.186 | 0.026 | 0.205 | 0.014 | |
| Absent | 118 | ||||||||
| Present | 42 | ||||||||
| Necrosis | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Absent | 45 | ||||||||
| Focal | 61 | ||||||||
| Moderate | 36 | ||||||||
| Extensive | 18 | ||||||||
| Fibrosis | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Absent | 11 | ||||||||
| Focal | 72 | ||||||||
| Moderate | 43 | ||||||||
| Extensive | 34 | ||||||||
| Maturation of fibrotic stroma | 0.252 | 0.002 | NS | NS | NS | NS | 0.202 | 0.015 | |
| Immature | 12 | ||||||||
| Intermediate | 91 | ||||||||
| Mature | 57 | ||||||||
Spearman's correlation coefficient test. NS, not statistically significant.
Figure 2.Postoperative disease-free survival curves of patients with colorectal cancer. Kaplan Meier curves for patients with intraepithelial TILs in (A) the invasive front and (B) the center of the mass of the tumor, and (C) stromal TILs in the invasive front and (D) the center of the mass of the tumor. TILs, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.
Prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer.
| P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Univariate | Multivariate | Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) |
| Age (<60 vs. ≥60) | 0.233 | – | 1.16 (0.14–1.20) |
| Sex (female vs. male) | 0.702 | – | 1.90 (1.47–2.18) |
| Tumor growth (expanding vs. infiltrate) | 0.760 | – | 0.82 (0.09–1.21) |
| Tumor size (<2.5 vs. 2.5–5 vs. >5 cm) | 0.416 | – | 0.77 (0.30–0.96) |
| Tumor Node Metastasis stage (I–IV) | 0.003 | 0.000 | 2.09 (0.13–5.35) |
| Dukes stage (A-D) | 0.579 | – | 0.78 (0.30–0.84) |
| Adenocarcinoma type (non-mucinous vs. partim mucin) | 0.452 | – | 0.69 (0.56–1.25) |
| Malignancy grade (2 vs. 3) | 0.429 | – | 0.48 (0.32–0.62) |
| Preoperative treatment (yes vs. no) | 0.040 | 0.065 | 1.53 (0.43–8.13) |
| pT stage (1–4) | 0.603 | – | 1.20 (0.27–1.47) |
| Venous invasion (yes vs. no) | 0.016 | 0.000 | 3.76 (1.32–5.23) |
| Lymphatic invasion (yes vs. no) | 0.432 | – | 0.57 (0.42–1.25) |
| Perineural invasion (yes vs. no) | 0.488 | – | 0.63 (0.48–0.64) |
| Number of removed lymph nodes (<5 vs. 5–10 vs. <10) | 0.453 | – | 0.80 (0.29–1.32) |
| Lymph node metastasis (yes vs. no) | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.71 (0.33–3.75) |
| Type of lymph node metastasis (micro vs. macro) | 0.235 | – | 0.78 (0.20–1.40) |
| Number of metastatic lymph nodes (<5 vs. ≥5) | 0.041 | 0.046 | 3.50 (0.62–3.97) |
| Lymph node pouch invasion (yes vs. no) | 0.161 | – | 1.83 (0.43–1.96) |
| Distant metastasis (yes vs. no) | 0.012 | 0.099 | 0.58 (0.32–2.70) |
| Distant metastasis size (<10 vs ≥10 mm) | 0.253 | – | 1.11 (0.98–1.30) |
| Tumor deposits (yes vs. no) | 0.815 | – | 1.06 (0.27–1.57) |
| Size of tumor deposits (<2.5 vs. ≥2.5 mm) | 0.217 | – | 1.16 (0.12–1.51) |
| Intraepithelial TILs in the invasive front of tumor (present vs. absent) | 0.357 | – | 1.18 (0.84–1.95) |
| Intraepithelial TILs in the centrum of tumor mass (present vs. absent) | 0.201 | – | 1.23 (1.07–1.63) |
| Stromal TILs in the invasive front of tumor (weak vs. moderate vs. strong) | 0.169 | – | 0.63 (0.33–0.88) |
| Stromal TILs in the centrum of tumor mass (weak vs. moderate vs. strong) | 0.231 | – | 0.70 (0.28–0.84) |
TILs, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.