Literature DB >> 29151510

The Clinical Features and Outcomes of Patients with Takotsubo Syndrome: The Experience at an Emergency General Hospital.

Takuya Nagata1, Masahiro Mohri1.   

Abstract

Objective We aimed to elucidate clinical characteristics, contemporary practice and outcomes of patients with takotsubo syndrome who were hospitalized in an emergency general hospital with angiography capabilities. Methods This retrospective study included a total of 42 consecutive patients who were admitted between January 2010 and August 2014. Results The study population included 11 men (26%) and 31 women (74%) [median age 76 years (interquartile range, 66-83)]. Physical stress and emotional stress were identified as triggers in 28 (67%) patients and 5 (12%) patients, respectively. Electrocardiographic changes were observed in 41 (98%) patients, with ST-segment elevation being the most common (71%) finding. In-hospital complications occurred in 24 (57%) patients, and acute pulmonary congestion or cardiogenic shock was seen in 21 (50%) patients. Five patients died during hospitalization (in-hospital mortality: 12%). Conclusion Takotsubo syndrome was associated with significant morbidity and mortality among elderly patients who were treated at an emergency general hospital. Physicians and surgeons in all departments should be aware of the condition, especially in acutely ill subjects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  elderly; emergency general hospital; takotsubo cardiomyopathy; takotsubo syndrome

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29151510      PMCID: PMC5874333          DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9249-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Med        ISSN: 0918-2918            Impact factor:   1.271


Introduction

Takotsubo syndrome is an acute disorder characterized by transient left ventricular dysfunction, which most commonly affects the apex. It is often preceded by an emotional or physical trigger. Postmenopausal women are preferentially affected, and the clinical presentation, electrocardiographic findings, and biomarker profiles often resemble those of acute coronary syndrome (1-3). Recent studies have reported life-threatening complications including left ventricular free wall rupture, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, thrombosis and cardiogenic shock, and the in-hospital or long-term outcomes are not necessarily as benign as previously reported (3, 4). In the present study, we aimed to elucidate the contemporary practice and outcomes of takotsubo syndrome in patients who were hospitalized in our hospital, which is a general hospital with angiography capabilities that is located in Kitakyushu city. Kitakyushu city is an industrial city with a population of approximately 972,000; individuals of ≥65 years of age account for 29% of the total resident population, while those of ≥75 years of age account for 14%. It is considered to be among the most aging metropolises in Japan.

Materials and Methods

A total of 42 consecutive patients with takotsubo syndrome who were admitted to Japan Community Healthcare Organization Kyushu Hospital between January 2010 and August 2014 were retrospectively studied. The diagnosis of takotsubo syndrome was based - in principle - on the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology diagnostic criteria for takotsubo syndrome (1). These include: 1) transient regional wall motion abnormalities of left ventricle frequently proceeded by a stressful trigger (emotional or physical); 2) left ventricular contraction abnormality extending beyond the geographic territory of a single coronary artery; 3) the absence of obstructive atherosclerotic coronary artery stenosis when coronary angiography is performed; 4) new and reversible electrocardiographic abnormalities; 5) elevated serum natriuretic peptide (BNP or NT-proBNP); 6) positive (but a relatively small elevation) for cardiac troponin; and 7) recovery of the ventricular systolic function on cardiac imaging at follow-up (3-6 months). In-hospital medical treatment and cardiac catheterization were provided at the discretion of physicians-in-charge. The data are shown as the median [interquartile range (IQR)] for continuous variables, and the number (percentage) for categorical data. The Mann-Whitney U test and Fischer's exact test were used as appropriate. All of the statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism 7 software program (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA).

Results

Table 1 summarizes the clinical characteristics of the studied patients. Eleven (26%) patients were men and 31 (74%) women. The age of the patients ranged from 10 months to 91 years [median age 76 years (IQR, 66-83)]. Coronary angiography was performed in 33 patients (79%). In the remaining nine patients, the diagnosis was made based on the echocardiographic findings of a left ventricular apical ballooning-like dilation in the acute phase and the late normalization of the left ventricular function. ST-segment elevation was the most common electrocardiographic finding and was seen at presentation in 30 (71%) patients. ST-segment depression, negative T wave and long QT (QTc >0.44 s) occurred in 13 (31%), 12 (29%) and 32 (76%) patients, respectively. Chest pain (48%) and shortness of breath (31%) were the most common symptoms on presentation. Seven patients had no symptoms and the occurrence of takotsubo syndrome was initially suggested by electrocardiography. Table 2 shows the possible triggers in the 42 patients. Physical stress and emotional stress were recognized in 28 patients (67%) and in 5 patients (12%), respectively. Medical illnesses were common and showed wide variation; they included respiratory, gastrointestinal, gynecological, neurological, endocrinological, ophthalmological and orthopedic disorders (Table 2). Nine patients were initially admitted to departments other than cardiology. The median peak serum creatine kinase concentration during hospitalization was 224 (IQR, 183-368) mg/dL. In-hospital complications occurred in 24 (57%) patients, and acute pulmonary congestion and cardiogenic shock were seen in 9 (21%) and 14 (33%) patients, respectively (Table 3).
Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics.

Age, years76 [66, 83]
Female gender31 (74%)
SBP, mmHg112 [90, 144]
HR, bpm88 [76, 106]
Hypertension24 (57%)
Diabetes8 (19%)
Dyslipidemia11 (26%)
Current smoker8 (19%)
Mental disorder3 (7%)
Malignant neoplasms2 (5%)
Elevated troponin and/or CK-MB at the onset30 (71%)
 
Electrocardiogram
ST elevation30 (71%)
ST depression13 (31%)
Negative T wave12 (29%)
long QT (QTc>0.44 sec)32 (76%)
normal1 (2%)
 
LVEF at diagnosis0.42 ± 0.16
Atypical wall motion abnormalities3 (7%)
 
Symptom at presentation
Chest pain20 (48%)
SOB13 (31%)
No complaints7 (17%)
others2 (5%)

Data are shown as number (percentage) of patients, median [interquartile range] or mean±SD.

HR: heart rate, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, SBP: systolic blood pressure, SOB: shortness of breath

Table 2.

Possible Triggers.

Physical stress28 (67%)
Respiratory disorders9 (21%)
Bacterial pneumoniae7 (17%)
Interstitial pneumonia1 (2%)
Neuromuscular respiratory failure1 (2%)
 
Abdominal/Gynecological disorders5 (12%)
Cholangitis2 (5%)
Superior mesenteric artery embolism2 (5%)
Torsion of ovarian tumor pedicle1 (2%)
Constipation1 (2%)
 
Central nervous system disorders2 (5%)
Cerebral hemorrhage1 (2%)
Norovirus encephalitis1 (2%)
 
Endocrinological /Metabolic disorders2 (5%)
Diabetic ketoacidosis1 (2%)
Renal failure1 (2%)
 
Others3 (7%)
Deep vein thrombosis1 (2%)
Anaphylactic shock induced by chemotherapy1 (2%)
Fever of unknown origin1 (2%)
 
Surgery/Invasive procedures2 (5%)
Excision of a left atrial myxoma1 (2%)
Bronchoscope1 (2%)
 
Orthopedical disorders/Trauma4 (10%)
Bone fractures2 (5%)
Crush syndrome1 (2%)
Eyeball rupture1 (2%)
 
Emotional stress5 (12%)
 
Unknown9 (21%)

Data are shown as number (percentage) of patients.

Table 3.

Managements and In-hospital Outcomes.

Complications24 (57%)
Acute pulmonary congestion9 (21%)
Cardiogenic shock14 (33%)
Acute pulmonary congestion or cardiogenic shock21 (50%)
Atrial fibrillation4 (10%)
NSVT1 (2%)
VF1 (2%)
CAVB1 (2%)
Sinus arrest1 (2%)
 
Managements
Catecholamine use12 (29%)
IABP2 (5%)
PCPS1 (2%)
Temporary pacemaker2 (5%)
Ventilation with endotracheal intubation9 (21%)
NIPPV2 (5%)
 
In hospital death5 (12%)
Cardiogenic shock3 (7%)
Cardiac rupture1 (2%)
Pneumoniae1 (2%)

Data are shown as number (percentage) of patients.

CAVB: complete atrioventricular block, IABP: intra-aortic balloon pumping, NIPPV: non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, NSVT: non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, PCPS: percutaneous cardiopulmonary support, VF: ventricular fibrillation

Baseline Characteristics. Data are shown as number (percentage) of patients, median [interquartile range] or mean±SD. HR: heart rate, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, SBP: systolic blood pressure, SOB: shortness of breath Possible Triggers. Data are shown as number (percentage) of patients. Managements and In-hospital Outcomes. Data are shown as number (percentage) of patients. CAVB: complete atrioventricular block, IABP: intra-aortic balloon pumping, NIPPV: non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, NSVT: non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, PCPS: percutaneous cardiopulmonary support, VF: ventricular fibrillation Catecholamines were administered to 12 (29%) patients, while mechanical circulatory support by intra-aortic balloon pumping or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was necessary in 3 (7%) patients. Respiratory support using a ventilator with endotracheal intubation and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation were required in 9 (21%) and 2 (5%) patients, respectively. Five patients died during hospitalization (in-hospital mortality, 12%; cardiogenic shock, n=3; left ventricular free-wall rupture, n=1; non-cardiovascular comorbidity, n=1). The age, systolic blood pressure, heart rate at the onset of symptoms, the prevalence of cardiac risk factors, the prevalence of physical and emotional triggers, the concentration of peak serum creatine kinase level, left ventricular ejection fraction at the diagnosis and the prevalence of complications did not differ between the survivors and the non-survivors to a statistically significant extent (Table 4). In addition, the above-mentioned clinical variables and outcomes did not differ between patients with an emotional or unknown trigger and those with a physical trigger.
Table 4.

Comparisons of Clinical Characteristics, Complications and Managements between Hospital Survivors and Non-survivors.

Survivors (n=37)Non-Survivors (n=5)p value
Age76 [66, 82]75 [74, 84]0.48
Female gender27 (73%)4 (80%)>0.99
Hypertension22 (59%)2 (40%)0.64
Diabetes6 (16%)2 (40%)0.24
Dyslipidemia11 (30%)0 (0%)0.30
Smoke7 (19%)1 (20%)>0.99
Mental disorder2 (5%)1 (20%)0.32
Carcinoma2 (5%)0 (0%)>0.99
Biomarker positive at the onset26 (70%)4 (80%)>0.99
ST elevation (≥ 1 mm)25 (68%)5 (100%)0.30
Negative T wave12 (32%)0 (0%)0.30
long QT (QTc>0.44)29 (78%)3 (60%)0.58
Within normal range1 (3%)0 (0%)>0.99
LVEF at diagnosis, %41±1545±230.49
Atypical LV wall motion3 (8%)0 (0%)>0.99
 
Symptom at presentation
Chest pain17 (46%)3 (60%)0.66
SOB11 (30%)2 (40%)0.64
No complaints7 (19%)0 (0%)0.57
others2 (5%)0 (0%)>0.99
 
Complications19 (51%)5 (100%)0.06
Acute pulmonary congestion9 (24%)0 (0%)0.57
Cardiogenic shock9 (24%)3 (60%)0.13
Acute pulmonary congestion or cardiogenic shock18 (49%)3 (60%)>0.99
Atrial fibrillation4 (11%)0 (0%)>0.99
NSVT1 (3%)0 (0%)>0.99
VF0 (0%)1 (20%)0.12
 
Managements
Catecholamine use9 (24%)3 (60%)0.13
IABP1 (3%)1 (20%)0.23
PCPS0 (0%)1 (20%)0.12
Temporary pacemaker1 (3%)1 (20%)0.23
Ventilation with endotracheal intubation7 (19%)2 (40%)0.29
NIPPV1 (3%)1 (20%)0.23

Data are shown as number (percentage) of patients, median[interquartile range] or mean±SD.

IABP: intra-aortic balloon pumping, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, NIPPV: non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, NSVT: non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, PCPS: percutaneous cardiopulmonary support, SOB: shortness of breath, VF: ventricular fibrillation

Comparisons of Clinical Characteristics, Complications and Managements between Hospital Survivors and Non-survivors. Data are shown as number (percentage) of patients, median[interquartile range] or mean±SD. IABP: intra-aortic balloon pumping, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, NIPPV: non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, NSVT: non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, PCPS: percutaneous cardiopulmonary support, SOB: shortness of breath, VF: ventricular fibrillation

Discussion

In the present study, we summarized the clinical features and short-term outcomes of 42 patients with takotsubo syndrome who were diagnosed at an emergency general hospital located in an aging metropolis of Japan. In comparison to previous reports, our study revealed several unique features. First, our patients were older in comparison to the patients in previous reports. The median age was 76 years old and a quarter of the study population was over 83 years of age. In contrast, the mean or median age of the patients enrolled in the previous studies was <70 years (2, 3, 5-8). Second, the rate of in-hospital mortality among our patients was relatively high. Previous studies described takotsubo syndrome as a benign disorder (in-hospital mortality, ≤1%) (6, 9); however a recent study using data from a large patient registry demonstrated that takotsubo syndrome was associated with several life-threatening complications and that the in-hospital mortality rate was 4.1% (3). Moreover, Citro et al. reported that the outcome of elderly (>75 years) patients presenting takotsubo syndrome was poor, with acute heart failure occurring in 22.9% of the patients and an in-hospital mortality rate of 6.3% (vs. 1.5% in patients of <75 years of age) (7). In our study, acute pulmonary congestion or cardiogenic shock occurred in 50% of the patients and the in-hospital mortality rate was 12%. The high mortality rate in the present study was most likely due to the advanced age of the patients and the presence of concomitant morbidities that occur in association with aging. Third, the major triggers that caused takotsubo syndrome in our patients were physical stresses related to a wide variety of medical illnesses. The prevalence of physical and emotional triggers varied considerably among previous reports (3, 6, 10). The high rate of patients with a physical trigger in the present study may be related to the serious background of the patients admitted to our hospital, which is designated as an emergency medical and critical care center.

Perspectives

A wide variety of medical and surgical disorders are managed in general hospitals, and our analysis suggests that takotsubo syndrome can occur in any critically ill patient. Chest symptoms are the most common symptom in these patients and new or presumed new electrocardiographic changes can provide an additional diagnostic clue. Healthcare professionals in all departments should not overlook the possibility of this lethal yet treatable condition.

Conclusion

Takotsubo syndrome was associated with significant morbidity and mortality in a cohort of elderly patients who were admitted to an emergency hospital. Physicians and surgeons in all departments should be aware of the condition, especially in acutely ill subjects.

The authors state that they have no Conflict of Interest (COI).
  10 in total

1.  Incidence, clinical findings, and outcome of women with left ventricular apical ballooning syndrome.

Authors:  Guido Parodi; Stefano Del Pace; Nazario Carrabba; Claudia Salvadori; Gentian Memisha; Ignazio Simonetti; David Antoniucci; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  The International Takotsubo Registry: Rationale, Design, Objectives, and First Results.

Authors:  Jelena-R Ghadri; Victoria L Cammann; Christian Templin
Journal:  Heart Fail Clin       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.179

3.  Natural history and expansive clinical profile of stress (tako-tsubo) cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Scott W Sharkey; Denise C Windenburg; John R Lesser; Martin S Maron; Robert G Hauser; Jennifer N Lesser; Tammy S Haas; James S Hodges; Barry J Maron
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Clinical characteristics and cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in stress (takotsubo) cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ingo Eitel; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Peter Bernhardt; Iacopo Carbone; Kai Muellerleile; Annachiara Aldrovandi; Marco Francone; Steffen Desch; Matthias Gutberlet; Oliver Strohm; Gerhard Schuler; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Holger Thiele; Matthias G Friedrich
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Differences in clinical features and in-hospital outcomes of older adults with tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Rodolfo Citro; Fausto Rigo; Mario Previtali; Quirino Ciampi; Francesco Antonini Canterin; Gennaro Provenza; Roberta Giudice; Marco Mariano Patella; Olga Vriz; Rahul Mehta; Cesare Baldi; Rajendra H Mehta; Eduardo Bossone
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Clinical Features and Outcomes of Takotsubo (Stress) Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Christian Templin; Jelena R Ghadri; Johanna Diekmann; L Christian Napp; Dana R Bataiosu; Milosz Jaguszewski; Victoria L Cammann; Annahita Sarcon; Verena Geyer; Catharina A Neumann; Burkhardt Seifert; Jens Hellermann; Moritz Schwyzer; Katharina Eisenhardt; Josef Jenewein; Jennifer Franke; Hugo A Katus; Christof Burgdorf; Heribert Schunkert; Christian Moeller; Holger Thiele; Johann Bauersachs; Carsten Tschöpe; Heinz-Peter Schultheiss; Charles A Laney; Lawrence Rajan; Guido Michels; Roman Pfister; Christian Ukena; Michael Böhm; Raimund Erbel; Alessandro Cuneo; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Claudius Jacobshagen; Gerd Hasenfuss; Mahir Karakas; Wolfgang Koenig; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Samir M Said; Ruediger C Braun-Dullaeus; Florim Cuculi; Adrian Banning; Thomas A Fischer; Tuija Vasankari; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Marcin Fijalkowski; Andrzej Rynkiewicz; Maciej Pawlak; Grzegorz Opolski; Rafal Dworakowski; Philip MacCarthy; Christoph Kaiser; Stefan Osswald; Leonarda Galiuto; Filippo Crea; Wolfgang Dichtl; Wolfgang M Franz; Klaus Empen; Stephan B Felix; Clément Delmas; Olivier Lairez; Paul Erne; Jeroen J Bax; Ian Ford; Frank Ruschitzka; Abhiram Prasad; Thomas F Lüscher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: Japanese perspective.

Authors:  Kenichi Aizawa; Toru Suzuki
Journal:  Heart Fail Clin       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.179

8.  Prevalence, associated factors and management implications of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in takotsubo cardiomyopathy: a two-year, two-center experience.

Authors:  Ole De Backer; Philippe Debonnaire; Sofie Gevaert; Luc Missault; Peter Gheeraert; Luc Muyldermans
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 9.  Current state of knowledge on Takotsubo syndrome: a Position Statement from the Taskforce on Takotsubo Syndrome of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Alexander R Lyon; Eduardo Bossone; Birke Schneider; Udo Sechtem; Rodolfo Citro; S Richard Underwood; Mary N Sheppard; Gemma A Figtree; Guido Parodi; Yoshihiro J Akashi; Frank Ruschitzka; Gerasimos Filippatos; Alexandre Mebazaa; Elmir Omerovic
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 15.534

10.  Observational study on Takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy: clinical features, diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up.

Authors:  Luca Cacciotti; Ilaria Passaseo; Giuseppe Marazzi; Giovanni Camastra; Giuseppe Campolongo; Sergio Beni; Fabrizio Lupparelli; Gerardo Ansalone
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.