Literature DB >> 29151341

Sequestration of U(VI) from Acidic, Alkaline, and High Ionic-Strength Aqueous Media by Functionalized Magnetic Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles: Capacity and Binding Mechanisms.

Dien Li1, Shani Egodawatte2, Daniel I Kaplan1, Sarah C Larsen2, Steven M Serkiz1, John C Seaman3, Kirk G Scheckel4, Jinru Lin5, Yuanming Pan5.   

Abstract

Uranium(VI) exhibits little adsorption onto sediment minerals in acidic, alkaline or high ionic-strength aqueous media that often occur in U mining or contaminated sites, which makes U(VI) very mobile and difficult to sequester. In this work, magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MMSNs) were functionalized with several organic ligands. The functionalized MMSNs were highly effective and had large binding capacity for U sequestration from high salt water (HSW) simulant (54 mg U/g sorbent). The functionalized MMSNs, after U exposure in HSW simulant, pH 3.5 and 9.6 artificial groundwater (AGW), were characterized by a host of spectroscopic methods. Among the key novel findings in this work was that in the HSW simulant or high pH AGW, the dominant U species bound to the functionalized MMSNs were uranyl or uranyl hydroxide, rather than uranyl carbonates as expected. The surface functional groups appear to be out-competing the carbonate ligands associated with the aqueous U species. The uranyl-like species were bound with N ligand as η2 bound motifs or phosphonate ligand as a monodentate, as well as on tetrahedral Si sites as an edge-sharing bidentate. The N and phosphonate ligand-functionalized MMSNs hold promise as effective sorbents for sequestering U from acidic, alkaline or high ionic-strength contaminated aqueous media.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29151341      PMCID: PMC5894121          DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  12 in total

1.  ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT.

Authors:  B Ravel; M Newville
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 2.616

2.  Quantifying the binding strength of U(VI) with phthalimidedioxime in comparison with glutarimidedioxime.

Authors:  Xiaoqi Sun; Guoxin Tian; Chao Xu; Linfeng Rao; Sinisa Vukovic; Sung Ok Kang; Benjamin P Hay
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 4.390

3.  Mining Critical Metals and Elements from Seawater: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Mamadou S Diallo; Madhusudhana Rao Kotte; Manki Cho
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Sequestering uranium from UO2(CO3)3(4-) in seawater with amine ligands: density functional theory calculations.

Authors:  Xiaojing Guo; Liangliang Huang; Cheng Li; Jiangtao Hu; Guozhong Wu; Ping Huai
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  How amidoximate binds the uranyl cation.

Authors:  Sinisa Vukovic; Lori A Watson; Sung Ok Kang; Radu Custelcean; Benjamin P Hay
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.165

6.  Theoretical insights on the interaction of uranium with amidoxime and carboxyl groups.

Authors:  Cong-Zhi Wang; Jian-Hui Lan; Qun-Yan Wu; Qiong Luo; Yu-Liang Zhao; Xiang-Ke Wang; Zhi-Fang Chai; Wei-Qun Shi
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 5.165

7.  Chemical Insight into the Adsorption of Chromium(III) on Iron Oxide/Mesoporous Silica Nanocomposites.

Authors:  Shani Egodawatte; Ashish Datt; Eric A Burns; Sarah C Larsen
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.882

8.  Molecular-scale characterization of uranium sorption by bone apatite materials for a permeable reactive barrier demonstration.

Authors:  C C Fuller; J R Bargar; J A Davis
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Thermodynamic studies of U(VI) complexation with glutardiamidoxime for sequestration of uranium from seawater.

Authors:  Guoxin Tian; Simon J Teat; Linfeng Rao
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 4.390

10.  Exchanges of uranium(VI) species in amidoxime-functionalized sorbents.

Authors:  Sadananda Das; Ashok K Pandey; Anjali A Athawale; Vijay K Manchanda
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  3 in total

1.  Uranyl Speciation on the Surface of Amidoximated Polyacrylonitrile Mats.

Authors:  Dmytro V Kravchuk; Anamar Blanes Diaz; Margaret E Carolan; Elias A Mpundu; David M Cwiertny; Tori Z Forbes
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.165

2.  Structural and Computational Characterization of a Bridging Zwitterionic-Amidoxime Uranyl Complex.

Authors:  Daniel A Decato; Orion B Berryman
Journal:  Org Chem Front       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 5.281

3.  Facile construction of Fe, N and P co-doped carbon spheres by carbothermal strategy for the adsorption and reduction of U(vi).

Authors:  Zhimin Dong; Zhibin Zhang; Runze Zhou; Yayu Dong; Yuanyuan Wei; Zhijian Zheng; Youqun Wang; Ying Dai; Xiaohong Cao; Yunhai Liu
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.036

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.