Literature DB >> 29151325

Mean ADC values discriminate rectal mucinous carcinomafrom rectal nonmucinous adenocarcinoma

Hale Çolakoğlu Er, Ayşe Erden.   

Abstract

Background/aim: This study aimed to differentiate rectal mucinous carcinoma (MC) from nonmucinous rectal adenocarcinoma (AC) using mean apparent diffusion coefficient (mADC) values obtained with diffusion-weighted imaging.Materials and methods: Sixty-two pathologically confirmed rectal AC (n = 44) and MC (n = 18) patients were included in this study. The two groups underwent pelvic MRI to determine the local staging baseline for rectal tumors. Once the region of interest (ROI) was determined, a border was drawn around each hyperintense tumor (b = 1000 s/mm2 images). Following a repeat of this procedure for each patient, the ROIs were recorded to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and mADC values were measured. The mADC was determined per slice, followed by a calculation of whole tumor volume ADC mean using the individual mADC values. The Mann?Whitney test was performed to compare mADCs for the two groups. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to determine the differentiating capacity of ADCs from MC to AC.
Results: The mADC was higher in MC (1.631 ± 0.375 x 10-3 mm2/s) (range: 0.95-2.36 x 10-3 mm2/s) than in AC (0.921 ± 0.157 x 10-3 mm2/s) (range: 0.6-1.48 x 10-3 mm2/s) (P < 0.001). mADCs were effective in distinguishing MC from AC (area under the ROC curve, 0.972 (95% CI : 0.928-1.00)). A threshold of 1.27 x 10-3 mm2/s was set that corresponded with high sensitivity (94.4%) and specificity (97.7%). Twelve MCs (67%) were predominantly hypointense, and 6 MCs (33%) were seen as mixed signal intensity lesions. Forty ACs (91%) were observed as hyperintense lesions, and 4 ACs (9%) had mixed signal intensity. There was a significant difference in the signal intensities between MC and AC (c2 = 54.7, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: MCs and ACs show different diffusion characteristics, which can be distinguished with high sensitivity and specificity and can help to improve prognostic treatment options.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rectal cancer; adenocarcinoma; mucinous adenocarcinoma; diffusion-weighted imaging; apparent diffusion coefficient

Year:  2017        PMID: 29151325     DOI: 10.3906/sag-1609-59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Med Sci        ISSN: 1300-0144            Impact factor:   0.973


  3 in total

1.  Native T1 mapping for differentiating the histopathologic type, grade, and stage of rectal adenocarcinoma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Juan Li; Xuemei Gao; Marcel Dominik Nickel; Jingliang Cheng; Jinxia Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 5.605

2.  CT and 3 Tesla MRI in the TN Staging of Colon Cancer: A Prospective, Blind Study.

Authors:  Søren R Rafaelsen; Claus Dam; Chris Vagn-Hansen; Jakob Møller; Hans B Rahr; Mikkel Sjöström; Jan Lindebjerg; Torben Frøstrup Hansen; Malene Roland Vils Pedersen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Single-centre evaluation and staging of rectal carcinoma on a 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with histological profile.

Authors:  Jandos Amankulov; Galiya Akhmetova; Dias Toleshbaev; Zhamilya Zholdybay; Laura Mangitova; Dilyara Kaidarova
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.