Literature DB >> 29151179

Comparison of three analgesic drug regimens with twelfth subcostal nerve block for pain control during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Miguel Maldonado-Avila1, Leopoldo Mateo Garduño-Arteaga2, Roberto Alejandro Vela-Mollinedo2, Jorge Jaspersen-Gastelum2, Francisco Virgen-Gutierrez2, Marcos Del Rosario-Santiago2, Victor Rios-Davila2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
OBJECTIVE: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is the first-line treatment in the majority of cases of upper urinary tract stones. Since its introduction, attempts have been made to establish the ideal accompanying analgesic method to enable the application of shock waves of adequate duration and intensity for efficacious stone fragmentation. An open, randomized, prospective, longitudinal, comparative, and experimental clinical study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of subcostal nerve block with lidocaine, comparing it in combination with tramadol or diclofenac for pain control during ESWL.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients of both sexes were included in the study. Thirty-five were men and 35 were women, all above 18 years of age, with kidney stones or ureteral stones smaller than 20 mm. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: Group 1 (24 patients) Twelfth subcostal nerve block with 10 ml of lidocaine 2%, 5 min before ESWL. Group 2 (25 patients) Twelfth subcostal nerve block with 10 ml lidocaine 2% + intramuscular diclofenac sodium 45 min before ESWL. Group 3 (21 patients) Twelfth subcostal nerve block with 10 ml of lidocaine 2% + tramadol at 1 mg/Kg of weight, 45 min before ESWL. The visual analog scale (VAS) for pain was applied at minutes 10, 20, and 30 of the procedure.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were reported by the ANOVA test for comparing the mean pain values between the three groups at minutes 10, 20, and 30 of the ESWL. There were no adverse effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Even though there were no statistically significant differences between the three groups, the analgesic regimen of twelfth subcostal nerve block with lidocaine 2%, alone, was as efficacious as its combination with other analgesics and therefore can be used as a sole analgesic method during ESWL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; Kidneys; Obstruction; Paravertebral block; Stone; Ureter

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29151179     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-017-1746-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  23 in total

1.  Local anesthesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a study comparing eutetic mixture of local anesthetics cream and lidocaine infiltration.

Authors:  M Honnens de Lichtenberg; J Miskowiak; P Mogensen; J T Andersen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  [Urolithiasis prevalence and risk factors in Yucatan, Mexico].

Authors:  Martha Medina-Escobedo; Mussaret Zaidi; Elizabeth Real-de León; Sergio Orozco-Rivadeneyra
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec

3.  Comparison of three different analgesic protocols during shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Fatih Ozkan; Fikret Erdemir; Unal Erkorkmaz; Ziya Kaya; Yesim Senayli; Bekir S Parlaktas
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Intercostal blocks with local infiltration anesthesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  V Malhotra; C W Long; M J Meister
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Randomized comparison of efficacy of paracetamol, lornoxicam, and tramadol representing three different groups of analgesics for pain control in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Gulgun Elif Akcali; Abdulkadir Iskender; Yavuz Demiraran; Ali Kayikci; Gulbin Sezen Yalcin; Kamil Cam; Yahya Okan Balcioglu
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Treatment of reno-ureteral colic by twelfth intercostal nerve block with lidocaine versus intramuscular diclofenac.

Authors:  Miguel Maldonado-Avila; Marcos Del Rosario-Santiago; Jesus Emmanuel Rosas-Nava; Hugo Arturo Manzanilla-Garcia; Victor Manuel Rios-Davila; Patricia Rodriguez-Nava; Roberto Alejandro Vela-Mollinedo; Mateo Leopoldo Garduño-Arteaga
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Comparative study in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with and without the use of local anaesthetic (Lidocaine 1%) infiltration at the shock wave site.

Authors:  B K C Nagendra; U Sharma
Journal:  Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ)       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun

8.  What are the parameters for predictive selection of patients requiring anesthesia for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?

Authors:  A Weber; K U Koehrmann; N Denig; M S Michel; P Alken
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Analgesia for pain control during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: Current status.

Authors:  Narmada P Gupta; Anup Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-04

10.  The Effect of EMLA Cream on Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Remifentanil in ESWL Procedure: A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Study.

Authors:  Arzu Acar; Elvan Erhan; M Nuri Deniz; Gulden Ugur
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2013-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.